I couldn't hold back investigating a bit more.
Like described in my last post, the timeout always occurred/started
in a GWTTestCase class that contained two test cases that involve RPC
calls.
I did split up these test cases such that they have their own
GWTTestCase class, and the timeout
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Ed post2edb...@gmail.com wrote:
I couldn't hold back investigating a bit more.
Like described in my last post, the timeout always occurred/started
in a GWTTestCase class that contained two test cases that involve RPC
calls.
I did split up these test cases
Hey Guys,
I am also interested in an implementation of GWT 2.1 MVP using GIN.
I have made some head way with it.
This has been done mostly by extending the ActivityManager,
PlaceController and PlaceHistoryHandler classes and overriding their
constructors to use GIN injection. I don't know if
This is something I'm really interested in as well Stephen.
-
How do you test these things? How does the next guy know
whether his event handler belongs in the view or the controller?
-
If the event doesn't change the view state, it doesn't belong in the
view. I would argue that clicking
Some comments on style
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1015801/diff/6001/7001
File dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/JavaToJavaScriptCompiler.java
(right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1015801/diff/6001/7001#newcode771
Revision: 9125
Author: gwt.mirror...@gmail.com
Date: Wed Oct 20 04:18:31 2010
Log: Cherry picking bugs from trunk into release branch: 1032801, 1035801,
1031801
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=9125
Modified:
/releases/2.1/samples/expenses/README-MAVEN.txt
Revision: 9126
Author: p...@google.com
Date: Wed Oct 20 07:53:40 2010
Log: Removing 2.1.0 tag (will re-add)
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=9126
Deleted:
/tags/2.1.0
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Revision: 9127
Author: p...@google.com
Date: Wed Oct 20 07:54:16 2010
Log: Adding 2.1.0 tag
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=9127
Added:
/tags/2.1.0
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
How do you test these things?
This gwt-hack example project is horribly unmaintained, but the idea is:
http://github.com/stephenh/gwt-hack/blob/master/src/test/java/com/bizo/gwthack/client/presenters/ClientPresenterTest.java
When GwtFooView is generated, so is StubFooView, which has fields
Hmmm, I see my comments about GIN in the ActivityMapper have caught up
with me. I haven't worked this out fully yet, but was thinking of
something along the lines of gwt-presenter's a
Any updates on this issue?
It seems very much like a bug as opposed to a purposeful design
choice. All the editors work with object graphs and it makes sense to
persist changes by sending object graph.
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Patrick Julien pjul...@gmail.com wrote:
Not to mention that
More notes on this:
Say I have the following relationship, a User has a list of
OfficeHours. Using the editor framework, I can create OfficeHours
proxies, add them to User and persist() and get the whole graph,
including new OfficeHours, on the server.
If I add a new OfficeHours proxy and update
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Tim Murison tim.muri...@gmail.com wrote:
Any updates on this issue?
I am burning down the server code this week.
--
Bob Vawter
Google Web Toolkit Team
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 12:02 PM, BobV b...@google.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Tim Murison tim.muri...@gmail.com wrote:
Any updates on this issue?
I am burning down the server code this week.
Will it be replaced with some shiny new server code?
--
Reviewers: jat, fabiomfv,
Description:
Update the npapi plugin to support OSX.
Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1036801/show
Affected files:
M plugins/npapi/Makefile
M plugins/npapi/manifest-template.json
A
LGTM if you have verified it works with the Linux .so's in the CRX and a
couple of nits.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1036801/diff/1/3
File plugins/npapi/manifest-template.json (right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1036801/diff/1/3#newcode24
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1036801/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1036801/diff/1/3
File plugins/npapi/manifest-template.json (right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1036801/diff/1/3#newcode24
plugins/npapi/manifest-template.json:24: { path:
Darwin-gcc3/gwtDev.plugin, public: true }
On 2010/10/20 17:24:20, jat wrote:
Why not include Gin in GWT 2.1 ? It could maybe be useful inside the
GWT codebase as well ?
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 5:32 PM, David Chandler drfibona...@google.com wrote:
Hmmm, I see my comments about GIN in the ActivityMapper have caught up
with me. I haven't worked this out fully yet, but was
Ok.
Be sure and check in the compiled libraries in prebuilt and an updated
CRX at the same time.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1036801/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
LGTM2
On 2010/10/20 18:54:20, jat wrote:
Ok.
Be sure and check in the compiled libraries in prebuilt and an updated
CRX at
the same time.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1036801/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Is this coming with GWT 2.1? I'm guessing this is a Chrome Extension
for Mac OS X
--
Arthur Kalmenson
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 3:10 PM, knor...@google.com wrote:
LGTM2
On 2010/10/20 18:54:20, jat wrote:
Ok.
Be sure and check in the compiled libraries in prebuilt and an updated
CRX
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1036801/diff/6001/7001
File plugins/npapi/Makefile (right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1036801/diff/6001/7001#newcode47
plugins/npapi/Makefile:47: CFLAGS += -DBROWSER_NPAPI -DXP_UNIX
-fshort-wchar
out of curiosity, why are we defining XP_UNIX for a
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Arthur Kalmenson arthur.k...@gmail.comwrote:
Is this coming with GWT 2.1? I'm guessing this is a Chrome Extension
for Mac OS X
The plugins are updated independently of GWT itself, and this can be used
with GWT 2.0 as well.
Note that Chrome on both Mac and
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1036801/diff/6001/7001
File plugins/npapi/Makefile (right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1036801/diff/6001/7001#newcode47
plugins/npapi/Makefile:47: CFLAGS += -DBROWSER_NPAPI -DXP_UNIX
-fshort-wchar
On 2010/10/20 19:31:06, fabiomfv wrote:
out of
Reviewers: zundel, bobv,
Description:
This is a reformulation of the TypeHandler change, which causes the
generated serializer class to serve as the TypeHandler interface
implementor. The current implementation uses an inner class, which
causes twice as many types to get generated.
Please
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1036801/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
On 2010/10/20 19:44:12, conroy wrote:
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1036801/diff/6001/7001
File plugins/npapi/Makefile (right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1036801/diff/6001/7001#newcode47
plugins/npapi/Makefile:47: CFLAGS += -DBROWSER_NPAPI -DXP_UNIX
-fshort-wchar
On
I'm glad you mention this: In the latest version of the patch I'm nuking
Makefile.mac (amongst other cruft) since unused bits like this laying around
just cause confusion.
XP_MACOSX is set higher up in the Makefile on the OS==mac check. I set
XP_UNIX there so that linux and mac can share it.
On
On 2010/10/20 20:06:42, conroy wrote:
I'm glad you mention this: In the latest version of the patch I'm
nuking
Makefile.mac (amongst other cruft) since unused bits like this laying
around
just cause confusion.
XP_MACOSX is set higher up in the Makefile on the OS==mac check. I set
XP_UNIX
LGTM, thanks.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1039801/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
All,
Somewhat similar to my previous email about GIN with MVP, I also have a
concern regarding using Code Splitting with the MVP framework as it sits
today. Specifically, it would appear that ActivityMapper can't use runAsync
because it has to return the matching activity synchronously.
Revision: 9129
Author: gry...@google.com
Date: Wed Oct 20 12:39:18 2010
Log: Exposes the built-in year-month-weekday-day format in PredefinedFormat.
Review at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1039801
Patch by: guillaume.ryder
Review by: jat
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1040801/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1040801/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
35 matches
Mail list logo
