[gwt-contrib] Re: Breaking change proposed: future proofing Activity in 2.1.1

2010-12-06 Thread Neil Fuller
Sorry for being so prescriptive in my first email about interfaces and mocking and starting a bit of a side discussion about interfaces Vs abstract classes. It smells a little like a no-one-right-answer discussion that has probably been debated in every API forum. I think most people could live

[gwt-contrib] Re: Breaking change proposed: future proofing Activity in 2.1.1

2010-12-06 Thread Jeff Larsen
Personally, I'm a fan of having both. The default implementation can be an abstract class but have that abstract class implement the Activity interface. Developers will be making a conscious choice to use the interface only knowing that they can introduce bugs. --

[gwt-contrib] Re: Update MissingPlugin.html to reflect new Chrome platform support (issue1184801)

2010-12-06 Thread fabiomfv
LGTM http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1184801/show -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit] r9357 committed - Cherry picking r9353 into release branch for Issues 5563 and 5460

2010-12-06 Thread codesite-noreply
Revision: 9357 Author: rchan...@google.com Date: Fri Dec 3 08:29:14 2010 Log: Cherry picking r9353 into release branch for Issues 5563 and 5460 http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=9357 Modified: /releases/2.1/user/src/com/google/gwt/text/client/DoubleParser.java

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit] r9358 committed - Undeprecate HandlerManager and TabPanel, neither of which is quite...

2010-12-06 Thread codesite-noreply
Revision: 9358 Author: gwt.mirror...@gmail.com Date: Mon Dec 6 07:53:26 2010 Log: Undeprecate HandlerManager and TabPanel, neither of which is quite ready to die yet. Review at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1187801 Review by: jlaba...@google.com

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit] r9359 committed - Rolling back r9354 due to some GWTTestCase breakages...

2010-12-06 Thread codesite-noreply
Revision: 9359 Author: gwt.mirror...@gmail.com Date: Mon Dec 6 07:55:08 2010 Log: Rolling back r9354 due to some GWTTestCase breakages Review at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1188801 http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=9359 Modified:

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit] r9360 committed - Update MissingPlugin.html to reflect new Chrome platform support...

2010-12-06 Thread codesite-noreply
Revision: 9360 Author: gwt.mirror...@gmail.com Date: Mon Dec 6 07:57:35 2010 Log: Update MissingPlugin.html to reflect new Chrome platform support Review at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1184801 http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=9360 Modified:

[gwt-contrib] Re: Modifications to StackTraceDeobfuscator: (issue1189801)

2010-12-06 Thread fredsa
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1189801/show -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

[gwt-contrib] Isolates the portion of TypeOracleMediator that (issue1188802)

2010-12-06 Thread zundel
Reviewers: jbrosenberg, scottb, tobyr, Description: Isolates the portion of TypeOracleMediator that deals with JDT derived classes such as CompilationUnit and Compiled Class. This sets up TypeOracleMediator so that the TypeOracle can potentially be built without referencing JDT output. Please

[gwt-contrib] Re: Isolates the portion of TypeOracleMediator that (issue1188802)

2010-12-06 Thread zundel
This change is not all the way ready for review, but I wanted some feedback on the testing portion. The overall aim of this change is to isolate the part of building the type oracle that relies on running the JDT compiler from the part that builds the type oracle from bytecode. The idea is to

[gwt-contrib] Re: Isolates the portion of TypeOracleMediator that (issue1188802)

2010-12-06 Thread zundel
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1188802/show -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit] r9361 committed - Modifications to StackTraceDeobfuscator:...

2010-12-06 Thread codesite-noreply
Revision: 9361 Author: fre...@google.com Date: Mon Dec 6 09:48:07 2010 Log: Modifications to StackTraceDeobfuscator: - Introduces a new protected method, getSymbolMapInputStream(), to obtain a symbol map InputStream for a given permutation strong name, to be overridden by subclasses. -

[gwt-contrib] Re: Modifications to StackTraceDeobfuscator: (issue1189801)

2010-12-06 Thread fredsa
Committed as r9361 http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1189801/show -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit] r9362 committed - Partial fix for http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/det...

2010-12-06 Thread codesite-noreply
Revision: 9362 Author: gwt.mirror...@gmail.com Date: Mon Dec 6 14:51:53 2010 Log: Partial fix for http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=5707 Modify JsInliner to avoid propagating expressions incorrectly. in EvaluationOrderVisitor, two changes were made. First of all,

Re: [gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit] r9362 committed - Partial fix for http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/det...

2010-12-06 Thread Ray Cromwell
I forgot to edit the log description before I submitted, this isn't a partial fix, it's a complete fix, although it is more conservative than it needs to be (an inliner could substitute and propagate expressions if it did better dataflow analysis). It can be made more optimal later. -Ray On Mon,

[gwt-contrib] Re: Isolates the portion of TypeOracleMediator that (issue1188802)

2010-12-06 Thread scottb
Looks like this is heading in a good direction. Idea for the test code. Another high level idea is that you a single test case superclass with the bulk of the code, then you have to two subclasses that only differ in how typeOracle is built. We use this pattern in other places.

[gwt-contrib] Tests don't compile, possible solution, and several tests failures

2010-12-06 Thread Luis Solano
Hi, I was trying to execute the test but I got this error: ... ... ... -filter.props: build: compile.emma.if.enabled: -compile.emma.if.enabled: compile.tests: compile.emma.if.enabled: -compile.emma.if.enabled: compile.tests: [mkdir] Created dir: /Users/Luis/Documents/workspace-gwt/gwt/build/

[gwt-contrib] Re: Public: Check constraints against the field or property that has the actual annotation. (issue1185801)

2010-12-06 Thread nchalko
PTAL http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1185801/show -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors