A while back -bindAddress 0.0.0.0 was changed in GWT 2.8 to use the actual
IP address instead of a local hostname to work better when operating in an
environment where the local hostname isn't recognized by the client
(specifically, things like windows tablets don't seem to recognize the mac
Yes, just run in headless mode by adding "-Djava.awt.headless=true" to your
VM arguments. I do this all the time on mac.
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/articles/javase/headless-136834.html
On Friday, August 19, 2016 at 11:56:24 AM UTC-7, Paul Stockley wrote:
>
> When launching the SDM code
That would be — awesome. Pretty please? :)
On Tuesday, May 17, 2016 at 11:13:09 AM UTC-7, Jens wrote:
>
>
> The issue is that @JsFunction implementors must "extend
>> java.lang.Object" as their parent. because standard library functions
>> are/canbe implemented on classes with complicated
to override
> those
> >>> other methods as well.
> >>>
> >>> You could nearly achieve this effect by just making a method reference
> to
> >>> the "apply" or "test" method, and passing that as an actual JsFunction
&
I think it would be good to add @JsFunction to all of the
java.util.function interfaces in the JRE Emulation so that we can use
standard function signatures with JsInterop.
Would that work? Any drawbacks?
If you think that's a good idea, I can submit a patch.
Thanks!
--
You received this
there because it didn't do that when both the plugin and GWT
were on 2.8.0-beta1, but perhaps it's really an issue with the GWT
snapshot. Being a snapshot, that's always a possibility of course. :)
Thanks for your help!
On Monday, May 2, 2016 at 5:09:56 PM UTC-7, David Becker wrote
Is there a newer gwt-maven-plugin than 2.8.0-beta1 that should be used with
GWT 2.8.0-SNAPSHOT? I want to try out the latest snapshots to keep abreast
of the current status-quo, but I'm getting red highlights on JRE Emulation
in IntelliJ that I don't get if I use GWT 2.8.0-beta1 with the
As a GXT developer at Sencha, we are keenly aware of the community's
concerns around the future of things like Widget, UiBinder, etc. and how
GWT 3 might upend the apple-cart. GWT 3 is still very far away and its
plans very nebulous. It's far too early to talk specifics, but I assure
you
I have incorporated the latest review feedback and reposted. Please review
again.
Thank you all for your patience as I learn the ropes...
On Tuesday, March 22, 2016 at 2:51:05 PM UTC-7, David Becker wrote:
>
> Hi Jens, et. al,
>
> I was just wondering if you thought
&
Hi Jens, et. al,
I was just wondering if you
thought https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/#/c/14300/ might get picked up
in time for 2.8? It seems to have stalled out on the review front.
Thanks!
On Thursday, January 28, 2016 at 3:55:34 PM UTC-8, Brandon Donnelson wrote:
>
> Thanks Jens,
>
10 matches
Mail list logo
