Comment by mbiama.e...@live.fr:
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/mod/core.html/?prefered=www.angosso_com_cgi.html/directive-dict.html#serverroot
For more information:
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/WAR_Design_1_6
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
On 2009/08/10 23:10:02, jat wrote:
I also renamed the write* methods based on your earlier feedback.
Minor nit, but is it really appropriate to call this a 'tab' key? It
seems like more of a window key, by which I mean browser window,
which may be a top-level window, a tab, or a frame.
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 9:26 AM, j...@google.com wrote:
On 2009/08/10 23:10:02, jat wrote:
I also renamed the write* methods based on your earlier feedback.
Minor nit, but is it really appropriate to call this a 'tab' key? It
seems like more of a window key, by which I mean browser window,
Hey Gary,
I can't speak more generally about GWT, but can give you some info on the
plugin.
We'll need more than just an XML schema (though we'll still have a simple
schema defining the legal top-level elements, for example). The
autocomplete choices will be too dynamic to be included in a
Reviewers: scottb,
Description:
This patch allows naming a runAsync call using a class literal. There
are now two overloads of GWT.runAsync, and the second one takes a class
literal as an argument. That literal is recorded by the
ReplaceRunAsyncs pass. It can then be used in the specification
Revision: 5938
Author: j...@google.com
Date: Tue Aug 11 09:09:06 2009
Log: Changed recently-committed test to exclude HtmlUnit, because it relies
on
correct layout.
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=5938
Modified:
Revision: 5939
Author: rj...@google.com
Date: Tue Aug 11 09:25:40 2009
Log: /trunk 5936 was merged into this branch
another wire protocol change to support the future ability to
differentiate opening a new tab from refreshing an existing one
svn merge -c5936
LGTM
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/57810
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Revision: 5940
Author: b...@google.com
Date: Tue Aug 11 10:21:03 2009
Log: Fix compiler errors when importing only Core.gwt.xml.
Fix generic type warnings in WeakMapping.
Patch by: bobv
Review by: rjrjr
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=5940
Added:
Revision: 5941
Author: r...@google.com
Date: Tue Aug 11 10:26:45 2009
Log: Swap expectaed and actual args in assertEquals()
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=5941
Modified:
/trunk/user/test/com/google/gwt/emultest/java/util/EnumSetTest.java
Revision: 5942
Author: b...@google.com
Date: Tue Aug 11 10:28:52 2009
Log: Delete empty directory left by r5940.
Should have used 'git svn dcommit --rmdir'
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=5942
Deleted:
LGTM
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/57810
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
There's sometimes an important difference between the kind of object model
that is appropriate to send to the client and one you'd use on the server.
That's the reason we haven't historically tried to make it easier to do
no-brainer sharing of server-side object models to the client (i.e.
because
Amir, Kango,
A UI like Reader is very easy to formulate (it will be a lot easier when I
check in DeckLayoutPanel). If you imagine a DeckPanel where 100% height
actually works properly, you would write something like this:
p.add(header, NORTH);
p.add(navPane, WEST);
p.add(footer, SOUTH);
Revision: 5943
Author: sco...@google.com
Date: Tue Aug 11 12:45:07 2009
Log: Creates infrastructure to test individual compiler passes.
Also started some very basic tests for ControlFlowAnalyzer,
ExpressionAnalyzer, and DeadCodeElimination.
Hopefully this will start the process of fixing
Revision: 5944
Author: sco...@google.com
Date: Tue Aug 11 12:50:31 2009
Log: Removes javax/servlet/*.java source files from gwt-user.jar.
By popular demand, we're removing these source files from gwt-user.jar
because Maven chokes on them and tries to recompile them.
Issue: 3851
Review by:
There's sometimes an important difference between the kind of object model
that is appropriate to send to the client and one you'd use on the server.
I absolutely agree with you here. And if I fully understand the
current reasoning, DTO creation is a way of forcing developers to
include as
Nathan,
To some extent you can make this happen by wrapping your method
implementations with GWT.isScript() or GWT.isClient() calls as appropriate.
Another approach is to use super-src so that you in fact have two
implementations of your class, one for the client, one for the server.
I realize
gwt-log will print those stack traces for you. To get the most out of it
you'll want to use GWT trunk and gwt-log trunk.
To get started:
http://code.google.com/p/gwt-log/wiki/GettingStarted
In particular, make sure you:
inherits name=com.google.gwt.core.EmulateJsStack/
Does this address issue 3682?
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=3682
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/56807
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Fred,
If I understand you correctly, if I have a method
void doFoo() {
if (!(GWT.isClient() || GWT.isScript())){
//do server-side stuff with breaking JRE references
}
}//doFoo
... the compiler will ignore everything after the conditional. Is that
accurate?
On Aug 11, 2:13 pm, Fred
Also, I don't know much about super-src. Can you point me to some
documentation about that? Everything I've read says do X and this
will happen I would like to have an understanding (superficial as my
understanding is probably going to be) of what going on under the
hood so that I know better
You mean DockLayoutPanel, right?
Anyway, makes perfect sense. The true challenge has always been with the
100% height desktop-app style layouts, which the new stuff will handle
beautifully.
Thanks.
- Amir
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Joel Webber j...@google.com wrote:
Amir, Kango,
A UI
Hi Lex,
I reviewed everything except CodeSplitter. I looked at it briefly, but
that class is fairly unfamiliar to me. Maybe Kathrin or Bob is a better
choice?
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/56814/diff/1/10
File dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/impl/ReplaceRunAsyncs.java
(right):
I think so, I reassigned that bug to jat for that reason.
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 4:27 PM, fre...@gmail.com wrote:
Does this address issue 3682?
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=3682
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/56807
Adding potential second eyeball reviewers.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/56807
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 5:05 PM, sco...@google.com wrote:
Hi Lex,
I reviewed everything except CodeSplitter. I looked at it briefly, but
that class is fairly unfamiliar to me. Maybe Kathrin or Bob is a better
choice?
Both of them already have reviews for me (or soon will). It's not
Joel,
is there a way to get the widget's default width/height? Maybe I do
something wrong, but this code
layer.setTopHeight(0, Unit.PX, north.getOffsetHeight(), Unit.PX);
does not work, returned height is too small.
Thanks,
George.
On Aug 11, 10:38 pm, Joel Webber j...@google.com wrote:
When switching GWT versions on my project I get this error (when I'm lucky):
*[ERROR] Invalid version number 2.0 passed to external.gwtOnLoad(),
expected 1.6; your hosted mode bootstrap file may be out of date; if you
are using -noserver try recompiling and redeploying your app*
However, if I'm
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 7:50 PM, Fred Sauer fre...@google.com wrote:
When switching GWT versions on my project I get this error (when I'm
lucky):
*[ERROR] Invalid version number 2.0 passed to external.gwtOnLoad(),
expected 1.6; your hosted mode bootstrap file may be out of date; if you
are
Reviewers: Ray Ryan,
Description:
The .htmlsrc template was updated in
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/51825
This review updates existing examples as well
Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/57812
Affected files:
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 5:14 PM, John Tamplin j...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 7:50 PM, Fred Sauer fre...@google.com wrote:
When switching GWT versions on my project I get this error (when I'm
lucky):
*[ERROR] Invalid version number 2.0 passed to external.gwtOnLoad(),
Revision: 5945
Author: j...@google.com
Date: Tue Aug 11 17:03:44 2009
Log: Correct misleading statement regarding plural forms reference.
Patch by: rebeccaward
Review by: abowers, bruce, jat
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=5945
Modified:
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 8:22 PM, Fred Sauer fre...@google.com wrote:
I'm not sure I understand the issue. If you have different versions of
hosted.html and GWT, things are likely to not work and that is why that
check was added in 1.6. I don't see how you could have the incorrect
contents
I agree the problem is begging out for a more elegant solution.
From the Google IO presentation on Google Wave powered by GWT a
solution using proto buffer and JSON instead of GWT RPC is mentioned.
I've been thinking that a similar result could be achieved annotation
the server side object model
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 6:29 PM, Lex Spoon sp...@google.com wrote:
Both of them already have reviews for me (or soon will). It's not
really a code splitter change, but new code to associate names with
AST nodes (in ReplaceRunAsync). CodeSplitter then looks up the names
as recorded. I was
Revision: 5946
Author: amitman...@google.com
Date: Tue Aug 11 18:19:35 2009
Log: HtmlUnit should release its resources when the webClient reference is
no longer held.
Patch by: amitmanjhi
Review by: kprobst (TBR)
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=5946
Modified:
Sounds great.
Is there enough information in the classes for new GEP functionality
or is extra information in going to need to be provided. Eg. the
capabilities of the com.google.gwt.uibinder.parsers classes.
There might be an opportunity to solve the custom widget parsing issue
and the GEP auto
Gary,
I'm really much more concerned about the API itself, rather than the
implementation details. That being said, I like the look of json
marshaller.
On Aug 11, 7:01 pm, Gary Miller miller.ga...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree the problem is begging out for a more elegant solution.
From the Google
Revision: 5947
Author: sco...@google.com
Date: Tue Aug 11 19:11:51 2009
Log: Sort format SerializableTypeOracleBuilderTest.
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=5947
Modified:
/trunk/user/test/com/google/gwt/user/rebind/rpc/SerializableTypeOracleBuilderTest.java
Revision: 5948
Author: sco...@google.com
Date: Tue Aug 11 19:15:27 2009
Log: Build fix: SerializableTypeOracleBuilderTest should use all the
standard units.
Also some minor related cleanup.
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=5948
Modified:
Revision: 5949
Author: sco...@google.com
Date: Tue Aug 11 19:16:05 2009
Log: Make SerializableTypeOracleBuilderTest run much faster by not building
the same type oracle over and over.
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=5949
Modified:
Nathan,
I'm not quite sure which API you are referring too. As there isn't an
API for DTOs.
My interpritation of Fred's post presents alternate ways of
implementing DTO.
If the Wave protobuffer mechanism was publicly available it would be a
great alternative to hand coded DTOs.
An annotation
Reviewers: Lex,
Description:
Hi Lex,
would you review this patch to the SOYC dashboard for me? It has two
main parts:
1) SOYC for multiple permutations. The dashboard will now read all
files in the symbolMaps directory and from it derive all the
permutations and their attributes. The
Mostly, this writeup is aimed at people who have been working on GWT's own
build-related stuff, but if anyone else has objections, now would be a good
time to raise them (though it seems unlikely anyone would).
In the past, we've never had a good naming scheme for distros other than the
general
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 5:47 PM, John Tamplin j...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 8:22 PM, Fred Sauer fre...@google.com wrote:
I'm not sure I understand the issue. If you have different versions of
hosted.html and GWT, things are likely to not work and that is why that
check was
@Gary
I have not seen the GoogleIo vid, why do you say wave uses json AND
protocol buffers to talk between client - server...?
On 12/08/2009, at 11:01 AM, Gary Miller miller.ga...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree the problem is begging out for a more elegant solution.
From the Google IO
47 matches
Mail list logo
