On 2 sep, 23:01, Ray Cromwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey guys,
I ran a preliminary benchmark on Chrome using Chronoscope [...],
and the numbers are pretty good.
That's really good news!
I'm running Chrome for a couple hours now and it looks terribly fast.
Here are my Dromaeo results:
On 15 sep, 23:23, Folke Behrens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With all the conversions to JSOs/overlay types going on I was
wondering if it makes sense to provide implementions of the core
JavaScript objects as well. I've already submitted RegExp (issue
1727)? (Granted, Math and Date are pretty
On 18 sep, 13:36, rockster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
in hosted mode I see the DateBox working as expected. In Chrome I
don't see anything happening.
I'm currently using GWT 1.5.2 on Windows and the GWT Incubator release
of september 2008.
Just a note to say that it's working fine for me
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=1279
The only difference is I'm using an external stylesheet to set the
popup's z-index, rather than inline style, so the fix from r2449
doesn't work for me.
I'll change my code to use inline style but I think issue 1279 should
be
Hi,
On 21 sep, 08:11, Reinier Zwitserloot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It was a lot more work than I originally thought, but its done, and it
does include the ability to create JSON and not just read it.
Judging from the example API usage from the issue tracker, it seems
a lot more convenient to
Could someone with OOPHM experience review this design doc about
adding hosted-mode support for AIR applications, based on OOPHM:
http://code.google.com/p/gwt-in-the-air/wiki/DesignOOPHM
Adobe AIR knowledge is obviously a plus, but I think isn't required to
understand the document. Anyway,
On 13 oct, 21:50, Ray Cromwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't have any OOPHM experience, but IIRC, linkers don't run in
hosted mode (or do they now?),
They don't.
so the last part of your design doc may
need revising.
Actually, it might rather be my neural compiler producing bad
I started playing a bit with an OOPHM client (for GWT-in-the-AIR). I
lloked a bit at the code and thought I could inherit BrowserChannel to
benefit from the *Message nested classes and the reactToMessages*
methods.
First, I wanted to know what kind of messages were exchanged, so my
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 2:40 PM, John Tamplin wrote:
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 5:46 AM, Thomas Broyer wrote:
What do you guys think about it? (first the idea of using
BrowserChannel as the basis to implement an OOPHM client, and then the
proposed changes to BrowserChannel to make it possible
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 1:57 AM, Thomas Broyer wrote:
Attached is a patch against branches/[EMAIL PROTECTED] which:
- moves the BrowserChannel's reactToMessages* and invoke methods into
a ServerBrowserChannel subclass
- moves the SessionHandler methods into a ServerSessionHandler,
except
On 19 oct, 00:29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat Oct 18 15:24:38 2008
New Revision: 3781
Added:
releases/1.6/events/
- copied from r3770, /releases/1.6/
Emily, did you really mean releases/1.6/events? Didn't you want
branches/events instead?
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 12:38 PM, Emily Crutcher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was trying to make it clear that the code was on the 1.6 release branch
rather then being branched off trunk, however that may not have been the
correct way to do that. Would branches/1.6/events be better?
The
Attached is a patch to update the DesignOOPHM wiki page to bring it in
line with the branches/oophm code (re messages and values)
--
Thomas Broyer
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Modified:
branches/1_6_events/user/src/com/google/gwt/event/shared/HandlerManager.jav a
===
===
---
branches/1_6_events/user/src/com/google/gwt/event/shared/HandlerManager.jav a
(original)
+++
On 27 oct, 23:59, John Tamplin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 10:31 AM, Thomas Broyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Attached is a patch to update the DesignOOPHM wiki page to bring it in
line with the branches/oophm code (re messages and values)
Committed, with some follow
On 28 oct, 15:44, Freeland Abbott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I don't suppose you could attach the fix, to save the next person those ten
minutes? ;-)
Given how easy it is, I described it instead:
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=2257#c7
(even giving the file name
On 30 oct, 21:18, Ray Ryan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
** Code Review **
*
*Currently none of the code in the branch has been code reviewed. Scrutiny
will be gratefully received.
shared subpackages are used on GWT-Incubator for code shared between
client and server. I would reorganize event
is related to that, and would additionally improve performance:
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=2927
--
Thomas Broyer
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
On 4 nov, 17:25, Ray Ryan wrote:
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 2:16 AM, Thomas Broyer wrote:
shared subpackages are used on GWT-Incubator for code shared between
client and server. I would reorganize event packages as follows:
- c.g.g.event.shared - c.g.g.event.client
On 9 déc, 07:16, Kelly Norton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chrome: 4ms (fairly recent change)
Safari (mac): 10ms
Safari (win): 15ms
Firefox: 15ms (or 10ms if flash is running)
IE: 15ms
Opera: I have no clue.
So, that's just a really long way of saying that there is no danger in
allowing 0
On 8 déc, 21:58, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The DOCTYPE actually makes a difference. The following DOCTYPE (default
in AppHtml.htmlsrc) works fine:
!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN
However, adding the loose.dtd makes body.parentElement return the same
size as
On 25 fév, 09:18, nicolas.deloof nicolas.del...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
As a gwt-log user I'd like to use the logging API from gwt-contrib. I
notice this one has the same limitation I got with gwt-log : user
can't configure the server URL for RemoteLogger. As my application has
multiple GWT
On 25 fév, 17:47, nicolas de loof nicolas.del...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, servlet-api defines url-pattern to be [ somepath/* | *.somextension ]
Oops, sorry!
Using gwt logging in a web application with multiple modules require to
setup as many servlet mappings as modules, just because
On 12 mar, 01:51, Allahbaksh Asadullah a.allahba...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
In most of cases we face situation where there are existing JavaScript
library available to do specific job (Example Online Diff). We don't want to
write it again but number of HTTP request to get those JavaScript files
On 26 mar, 19:18, John Tamplin j...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 1:40 PM, Scott Blum sco...@google.com wrote:
That's not good it looks like Nicolas found an object for which trying
to evaluate (!!o.nodeType) throws an exception.
If my atrophied high-school French is
On 31 mar, 22:29, Ray Cromwell cromwell...@gmail.com wrote:
Wouldn't this cause a problem when you want more than one JSO to implement
Iterable? I wouldn't make the class itself implement Iterable, I'd add a
helper method to return an Iterable, e.g.
public class JsArrayT extends
already are a level
lower than the top request-log); i.e. DEBUG for errors (HTTP status =
400) and SPAM otherwise.
--
Thomas Broyer
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 10:27 AM, Thomas Broyer wrote:
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 9:07 PM, John Tamplin wrote:
Thanks -- committed to trunk as r5194 with minor formatting changes.
Yay! ;-)
Oh! didn't notice you said trunk, I was hoping for releases/1.6; as
trunk would hopefully have OOPHM when
On 14 avr, 17:03, Jason Essington jason.essing...@gmail.com wrote:
I fail to see how this resolves arun's bug with GWT form panel
Arun's issue is with his code, not the FormPanel:
form.addFormHandler(new FormHandler() {
public void onSubmit(FormSubmitEvent event) {
On 20 avr, 08:43, nicolas de loof nicolas.del...@gmail.com wrote:
I wonder if there is any way to also pre-process Java sources, for
example
this would enable support for Aspect Oriented Programming or maybe some
DataBinding framework.
Depends what you mean by pre-process...
On 20 avr, 20:12, Vitali Lovich vlov...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a compelling reason that the default HTML generated by the GWT
project creator uses quirks mode instead of strict?
Standards mode isn't actually fully supported...
See for example:
On 5 mai, 10:15, stuckagain david.no...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
We are currently moving to the GWT 1.6 release and also updated to the
latest incubator.
I am having a problem with the GlassPanel widget in the incubator and
looked a bit into the implementation.
It has a functionality that
On 5 mai, 17:49, Iyer aruniye...@gmail.com wrote:
I am viewing the source on render of the jsp , infact full source,
where in all the elements of anchor tag will eb updated except the
name attribute of the anchor tag. say href, font for the hyperlink
text but the name doesnt get updated.
On 29 mai, 02:18, Vitali Lovich vlov...@gmail.com wrote:
It would be nice if there was a way to wrap Java methods with an opaque
Javascript function object so that you could pass them around in the native
code (obviously there are issues with compiler optimizations in this case).
Ideally,
On 7 juin, 02:24, Mark Renouf mark.ren...@gmail.com wrote:
If the WebSocket
standard ever materializes, it could be even better (and standards
based), and act as a last-resort fallback on all platforms.
WebSocket is all about async communications which is a show-stopper
for OOPHM. When I
On 7 juin, 02:13, Mark Renouf mark.ren...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 5, 12:49 pm, Piotr Jaroszyński p.jaroszyn...@gmail.com wrote:
Security-wise I think it can match the w3 spec - at least for GETs and
POSTs (other methods are not supported in GWT anyway because of the
safari bug). The
On 5 juin, 19:22, Bart Guijt bgu...@gmail.com wrote:
Cool!
I am specifically interested in the AppCache manifest linker, which
was also mentioned on one of the slides. Can *that* code be made
public too?
It shouldn't be that different from the Gears Offline linker you can
already find
On 11 juin, 16:11, John Tamplin j...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 7:51 AM, Joel Webber j...@google.com wrote:
+1 Ray. Now here's the really tricky question. Is there any way we can take
advantage of Javascript's for (x in y) { ... } syntax (and should we,
given its spotty
[Cc'ing John as he is the owner for keyboard-related issues 1061 and
1529]
Issue 3753 has been reported a few hours ago.
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=3753
When I saw it, I immediately thought this is a dupe and we all know
what should have been done, it's just a
works in IE8 (for the 'filter' prperty) in all modes:
http://www.quirksmode.org/css/opacity.html
--
Thomas Broyer
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
On 2 juil, 17:03, Joel Webber j...@google.com wrote:
Some others that might be interesting:
Canvas:
This is a nasty case, because Canvas cannot be implemented sanely or
efficiently on top of VML, which is the only game in IE town. Existing
canvas-on-VML implementations notwithstanding --
Reviewers: t.broyer,
Description:
This patch adds support for Gears 0.5.21 BlobBuilder API.
Please review this at http://galgwt-reviews.appspot.com/41603
Affected files:
gears/src/com/google/gwt/gears/client/Factory.java
gears/src/com/google/gwt/gears/client/blobbuilder/BlobBuilder.java
On 6 juil, 04:09, Eric Ayers zun...@google.com wrote:
Hi Thomas,
It looks like something is wrong with the patch. The 'Factory'
portion doesn't show up.
Well, only the side-by-side view fails actually.
http://galgwt-reviews.appspot.com/41603/patch/1/4
Probably just a hiccup with
On 8 juil, 05:34, brett.wooldridge brett.wooldri...@gmail.com
wrote:
I've installed the plugin. However, when I launch hosted mode the
window reports:
[INFO] Launching firefox with url
Followed by lots of NS* (NetScape) related errors in the Eclipse
console. I have checked my OS and
On 16 juil, 17:12, stuckagain david.no...@gmail.com wrote:
Joel,
Glad to read that I am not totally going nuts.
Unfortunately I need to support IE6,7 and 8... so using tables is
currently inevitable.
Hit F12 in IE8 (or choose Development Tools from the Tools menu);
you'll get the ie8
On 20 août, 21:00, jlaba...@google.com wrote:
Thanks for the patches. Looks like there is some auto-format cruft,
I noticed the changes on Document but I had previously checked my
Java Code Style preferences...
but
it LGTM overall.
Does it mean I should resubmit an updated patch? or you
On 2 sep, 19:56, codesite-nore...@google.com wrote:
Revision: 6073
Author: jlaba...@google.com
Date: Wed Sep 2 10:55:41 2009
Log: Removing an assertion that introduced a breaking change.
Patch by: jlabanca
Review by: jgw (TBR)
Hi Ray et al,
Looking at the UiBinder wiki page and heading a bit in the code, I
cannot find if it is possible for UiBinder to generate IDs to
associate two elements/widgets, such as an HTML label and an input
or ui:TextBox (but also an img and a map, or aria-describedby
for example).
Here's
ui:style/ it couldn't be usable
within a ClientBundle (IDs are generated for each call to
createAndBindUi).
In this case, you'd have:
public interface MyIds extends IdResource {
String text();
String list();
}
@UiField MyIds ids;
--
Thomas Broyer
/tɔ.ma.bʁwa.je
written in the rush spaghetti code to well
designed MVP+DI+EventBus+HTMLPanel+etc.), so I'll only test this
later rather than sooner, but thanks anyway!
--
Thomas Broyer
/tɔ.ma.bʁwa.je/
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit
On 6 oct, 17:47, Ray Ryan rj...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 8:43 AM, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
If I understand correctly how UiBinder works, for widgets, I'd still
have to inject the ID myself using
theWidget.getElement().setId(bundle.a().toString
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Ray Ryan rj...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 8:43 AM, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
If I understand correctly how UiBinder works, for widgets, I'd still
have to inject the ID myself using
theWidget.getElement().setId(bundle.a().toString
On Nov 4, 7:28 pm, Joel Webber j...@google.com wrote:
All,
The code in FocusImplOld has been a great source of consternation for some
time now. It's probably never going to be possible to fix every bug that
crops up as a result of the ugly hidden input it creates, and I'm starting
to
On Nov 9, 12:30 pm, Ray Cromwell cromwell...@gmail.com wrote:
Safari2 is so broken anyway, it's just not worth it. :)
The issue actually here is with Safari 3 (history, xmlhttprequest
being limited to GET and POST, and probably a few other small things
were Safari 2 only, but focus is
Hi all,
We're starting using UiBinder quite intensively and one thing we
haven't been able to do is to declare some constants in a CssResource
and reuse them in our ui.xml (I believe this is unrelated to UiBinder
actually, as I don't know how it could be made to work with plain old
CssResources
also need the dialog
to contain widgets, but that's just a detail ;-) ). As for what GWT
should do in the end, well, I have no idea for now, sorry...
--
Thomas Broyer
/tɔ.ma.bʁwa.je/
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit
On 22 nov, 18:24, MartinGoros martin.goroste...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi people,
After downloading GWT 2.0 RC I thought that the Incubator's GlassPanel
modified as stated inhttp://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/39806/show
would be there but didn't find it... Any comments in the status of the
that
On Nov 24, 3:39 pm, Chris chrish...@gmail.com wrote:
Has a decision been made as the whether or not the new Layout widgets
will be in 2.0? Or a subsequent dot release?
They're already there (MS2 and RC1), so why wouldn't they be in 2.0
final?
--
On Nov 25, 4:08 am, Chris chrish...@gmail.com wrote:
Glad to hear that.
When I read:http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/GWT_2_0_RC
And there is no mention of new widgets and there are comments like:
* NOTE: This class is still very new, and its interface may change
without
On Nov 26, 10:15 am, Ray Cromwell cromwell...@gmail.com wrote:
IntelliJ IDEA likes to add -style as a command line parameter when
launching DevMode, but it seems ArgHandlerScriptStyle is no longer used for
hosted mode. Is this intentional?
Yes Ray, and it was already the case in RC1 (and
On Nov 27, 2:08 am, John Tamplin j...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 12:34 PM, t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
Unfortunately, I have neither selenium nor RMI configured, and
PopupPanel tests are disabled in HtmlUnit; so I haven't been able to run
the unit tests against my changes;
Hi all,
the -runStyle argument documentation from JUnitShell says you can pass
the fully qualified name of a class. What it doesn't say, first,
thought that's somehow implicit, is that this class has to extend
RunStyle.
But RunStyle is package-protected, forcing you to put your class in
the
On 28 nov, 12:29, dflorey daniel.flo...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for your suggestion! I've uploaded a generated file and will
post the response to this thread.
I was wondering if all gwt-generated files will be classified as
malware by Avira or if it depends on some generated javascript
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 4:16 PM, John Tamplin j...@google.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think that's what you really want though; it seems like
RunStyle was meant to be public so you can extend it in any package
you like
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 8:08 PM, John Tamplin wrote:
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Thomas Broyer wrote:
Do you think HtmlUnit integration is stable enough so this refactoring
could happen before 2.0 ship? (I could –try to– contribute the
refactoring in time, if needed)
Such a change
://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=4287
--
Thomas Broyer
/tɔ.ma.bʁwa.je/
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
On Nov 30, 3:43 pm, BobV b...@google.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 10:54 AM, Ray Ryan rj...@google.com wrote:
Does one app make heavier use of CssResource than the other? A bell is
ringing about mhtml security concerns. Or did we back out our mhtml use?
I disabled MHTML support in
Hi all,
[long intro, sorry, you can skip to interesting bits start here if
you want]
SpeedTracer tells me that in rendering a list of results
(JsArrayEmployee returned by a RequestBuilder as JSON, displayed in
a Grid widget; no other widgets involved), Chrome is spending 57.2% of
its time, i.e.
On 16 déc, 18:01, Bruce Johnson br...@google.com wrote:
Working on a draft one.
What do folks here think is important?
- remove listeners (wasn't this targeted to 2.0 ?)
- port all widgets to c.g.g.dom.client.Element and deprecate both
c.g.g.user.client.Element and c.g.g.user.client.DOM
On 16 déc, 21:06, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16 déc, 18:01, Bruce Johnson br...@google.com wrote:
Working on a draft one.
What do folks here think is important?
- remove listeners (wasn't this targeted to 2.0 ?)
- port all widgets to c.g.g.dom.client.Element
On Dec 16, 3:16 pm, Joel Webber j...@google.com wrote:
Thomas,
Your assessment that this is an accidental legacy is basically correct. This
code should definitely be optimized -- if you could file an issue, that
would be helpful. Hopefully it makes little difference in practice, because
of
Hi Googlers,
How about deprecating c.g.g.user.client.Element and
c.g.g.user.client.DOM altogether and port all existing widgets to
c.g.g.dom.client.*?
A first pass, say in 2.1, wouldn't break public APIs, still using
c.g.g.user.client.Element as public and protected methods' return type
and
On Jan 3, 6:42 am, jarrod jarrod.carl...@gmail.com wrote:
While working with some of the new Layout widgets (DockLayoutPanel in
particular), I noticed
that older widgets, such as HTML, automatically set a default primary
style name in the
constructor, while the DockLayoutPanel does not.
On Jan 3, 5:24 pm, jarrod jarrod.carl...@gmail.com wrote:
Using both setStyle and addStyleNames isn't a necessity. However,
in some cases, it is desirable to remove any existing, default styles
from the widget (in the case of HTML) before adding my own custom
styles. For this to be
Hi googlers,
In DOMImplMozilla's initSyntheticMouseUpEvents is a reference to
$wnd.__captureElem, which is never set (or read) anywhere, making the
workaround fail as being no-op in practice.
Shouldn't it be
@com.google.gwt.user.client.impl.DOMImplStandard::captureElem instead?
--
to not
use it (all its functionality was subsumed by Document/Element a long time
ago). We're working on our 2010 roadmap right now, and this will definitely
be a part of it.
That's Really. Good. News!
(thanks for this birthday gift ;-) )
--
Thomas Broyer
/tɔ.ma.bʁwa.je/
--
http://groups.google.com
On Jan 6, 3:47 pm, Joel Webber j...@google.com wrote:
Daniel,
I'm seeing Showcase work fine on both Chrome/Mac and Chrome/Windows.
Just test our app too, works fine.
For http://www.floreysoft.com/I'm seeing different behaviors on each:
Windows: Everything seems to work fine, except for
On Jan 7, 12:23 am, John Tamplin j...@google.com wrote:
What about the case of multiple instances of the same module?
How about simply using Document.get().createUniqueId() ?
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
On Jan 9, 9:34 pm, jarrod jarrod.carl...@gmail.com wrote:
Last year Google I/O featured a session on architecting GWT
applications using the Model View Presenter paradigm (http://
code.google.com/events/io/2009/sessions/
GoogleWebToolkitBestPractices.html). Since then I have been working to
On 1 fév, 20:26, codesite-nore...@google.com wrote:
Revision: 7517
Author: tomer...@google.com
Date: Mon Feb 1 08:08:26 2010
Log: Adding RegExp to public GWT (native version, pure Java version, tests)
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=7517
Added:
On Feb 1, 9:33 pm, John Tamplin j...@google.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
Isn't translatable code generally going into /trunk/user/super, and
the subpackage being called translatable rather than super?
Those are JRE and infrastructure
On Feb 2, 8:16 pm, Tom tomson...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have some questions and proposals around the JsArray-classes because
they are handy when working with JSNI but I believe they could be
improved a bit.
a) Why are not all native methods provided through the wrapper.
Missing methods
On 8 fév, 10:17, Thomas Broyer wrote:
I'm thinking in starting a Wave about how I think event handling
should be refactored.
Done: https://wave.google.com/wave/#restored:wave:googlewave.com!w%252Bux7zL81XA
Still To Be Continued, and I'll try to work on a patch later on if I
find some time
On Feb 14, 3:03 am, jarrod jarrod.carl...@gmail.com wrote:
Would anyone be willing to explain a little bit about the difference
between Scheduler.scheduleDeferred and DeferredCommand.addCommand?
They appear to serve roughly the same purpose, so I'm wondering why
the duplicate functionality,
On Feb 15, 4:39 pm, John LaBanca jlaba...@google.com wrote:
I believe there is one other difference, but somebody else on the team will
have to confirm.
DeferredCommand uses a timeout of 0, which means that the command executes
AFTER the current event loop finishes.
On Feb 16, 2:32 pm, mozSte ste.biopa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I'm a newbie, so excuse me if this was posted/solved already.
I have a quick suggestion on the implementation of a safeEval (or
safer, anyway) parsing to the JSONUtils class.
public static native T extends
On Feb 20, 12:09 am, Nathan Wells nwwe...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a reason SelectionEvent has only a protected constructor?
Usually, when GWT APIs seem unnecessarily restrictive, it's because
you want us to think before doing something that might be stupid. If
that's the case here, can
On Mar 20, 11:53 am, nicolas.deloof nicolas.del...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
I tried my GWT 2.0 webapp with the recent test build of IE9 and it
doesn't display. I wonder IE9 is not recognized as IE, event whit IE8
mode set.
I tested our two apps and they (seem to) work OK. Developer tools tell
On Apr 26, 2:09 pm, Joel Webber j...@google.com wrote:
Kerr,
Can you show me roughly the code needed to get into this state? It sounds
like it could be a problem, but I'm having a slightly hard time imagining
the precise code that got you here.
A co-worker of mine faced it a few weeks ago:
On Apr 26, 4:12 pm, John Tamplin j...@google.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 9:21 AM, dflorey daniel.flo...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a way to easily serialize GTW-serializable objects to string
on the client side?
I'd like to be able to story arbitrary objects to the html5/gears
On 18 mai, 14:14, nicolas de loof nicolas.del...@gmail.com wrote:
I also notice the POM used to publish GWT artifacts is limited to required
data, but does not include what is expected for a valid artifact to be
deployed on maven central (license, SCM url, mailing lists...) and can be
used
The JavaDoc for Regexp::test says:
* Determines if the regular expression matches the given string.
This call
* affects the value returned by {...@link #getLastIndex()} if the
global flag is
* not set. Equivalent to: {...@code exec(input) != null}
It should obviously read if the global
On Jun 7, 1:43 pm, Frank Verbruggen fea...@gmail.com wrote:
I am currently writing some code to use models for a subclass of the
Grid class.
The idea being that I want to port a rich Java interface from Swing to
GWT.
This interface uses lots of JTables and TableModels,
and I would like to
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 11:59 PM, Dan ddum...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't suppose you could bump the wave Thomas? I seem to not have
access to do anything but add blank replies...
I've added you to the wave. Don't know what happened as you're a
member of GWT-Contrib, which has full access to the
Hi Googlers^H^H G-men!
Do you have any ETA for 2.1 M2 (or RC1?), and/or 2.1 GA?
We're looking at RequestFactory, ActivityManager and data presentation
widgets for a new project, but they're far from complete now
(particularly RequestFactory, and ActivityManager isn't plugged with
the History).
Le 21 juin 2010 14:29, Chris Ramsdale cramsd...@google.com a écrit :
While this shouldn't be taken as a binding set of dates, we are looking to
wrap up a 2.1 RC in late Q3, with GA release in early Q4.
On 21 juin, 20:50, Joel Webber j...@google.com wrote:
We're also working to get the new
Aside from not being plugged with the History (yet), the one thing
that bothers me (a little), something that I have in my current (very
own) PlaceManager that isn't in PlaceController/ActivityManager, and
contrary to History-binding has an impact on the API, is plumbing
between PlaceController
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 2:37 AM, j...@google.com wrote:
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/646803/show
All in all, it really feels over-engineered to me. Sorry to be harsh,
but let me explain:
What's the purpose of RawWebSocketImpl vs. WebSocket? that you could
do a new WebSocket() instead of
On 20 juil, 03:15, jarrod jarrod.carl...@gmail.com wrote:
I've spent some time looking through the new RequestFactory and
ValueStore packages in GWT 2.1-M2. I am excited to see data binding
and validation creeping into the core GWT code. However, I have a bit
of a concern that the current
Hi G-Men,
I've started prototyping with Activities and can now give some more
feedback on how it compares to my previous own implementation of a
PlaceManager and how I used it with MVP.
First, my PlaceManager was nothing more than the PlaceController found
in GWT 2.1. This meant that when
1 - 100 of 1108 matches
Mail list logo
