On 2012/06/14 01:20:58, skybrian wrote:
To fix the compiler and close issue 7397, we only need to add json (of
any
version) to gwt-dev.jar. So I think I'm going to commit a tiny change
that just
does that. We can defer the other stuff until we have a better plan.
OK let's do that. Baby
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 11:23 PM, Rajeev Dayal rda...@google.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Brian Slesinsky skybr...@google.com
wrote:
I don't think we support Java 1.5 anymore?
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=6790
I've removed the changes concerning javax.validation, so it's still
distributed as a separate JAR.
org.json is now bundled in gwt-dev, no longer bundled into
requestfactory-* JARs, and distributed as a separate JAR in the SDK (so
that requestfactory users have the choice to user
I don't think we support Java 1.5 anymore?
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=6790
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/google-web-toolkit/fATw0rL8lSE/xbxX5Hf8ozUJ
I'm totally fine with dropping support for 1.5 altogether.
- Brian
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 9:47 AM,
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Brian Slesinsky skybr...@google.comwrote:
I don't think we support Java 1.5 anymore?
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=6790
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/google-web-toolkit/fATw0rL8lSE/xbxX5Hf8ozUJ
I'm totally fine with
Okay, seems fine for now. I'm going to commit this.
https://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1731804/
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
On 2012/06/13 21:45:00, skybrian wrote:
Okay, seems fine for now. I'm going to commit this.
FYI, I just removed all occurrences of json-1.5.jar, so we consistently
use json.jar everywhere.
https://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1731804/
--
I'm getting failing tests because JSON is gone from gwt-user.jar and the
requestfactory jars. I could add the dependency internal to google, but
I think we might still be trying to do too much at once - this is
looking more like churn than an actual improvement.
To fix the compiler and close
Moving org.json into gwt-dev makes sense because the compiler actually
uses it. I'd like to see it repackaged, but perhaps we can wait until
someone complains?
I'm not sure about validation. Many people don't use it and I sorta
think GWT's validation support ought to be split out of gwt-user
I'm not sure about validation. Many people don't use it and I sorta
think GWT's validation support ought to be split out of gwt-user into a
separate jar. If there's no actual bug than I'm inclined to leave it
alone for now.
This would absolutely kill compatibility with gwt-validation.
think GWT's validation support ought to be split out of gwt-user
into a separate jar.
This would absolutely kill compatibility with gwt-validation
I know very little about gwt-validation and GWT's javax validation, but
wouldn't having GWT's validation in a separate jar make it easier for
On 2012/06/08 18:02:44, skybrian wrote:
Moving org.json into gwt-dev makes sense because the compiler actually
uses it.
I'd like to see it repackaged, but perhaps we can wait until someone
complains?
I'm not sure about validation. Many people don't use it and I sorta
think GWT's
Chris, I'm not sure what you mean by This. Do you mean the patch as
it stands or something I've been speculating about?
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Chris Ruffalo chris.ruff...@gmail.com wrote:
This would absolutely kill compatibility with gwt-validation.
I guess I didn't make myself clear, I was agreeing. GWT's validation
should *always* be in a separate module from gwt-user. What I should have
said Otherwise, this would completely kill...
I don't think that moving javax.validation into gwt-user would be a good
idea. Especially if it comes
Okay, I think we should just fix JSON in this patch and figure out
validation as a separate patch.
- Brian
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Chris Ruffalo chris.ruff...@gmail.com wrote:
I guess I didn't make myself clear, I was agreeing. GWT's validation
should *always* be in a separate
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 8:43 PM, Chris Ruffalo chris.ruff...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure about validation. Many people don't use it and I sorta
think GWT's validation support ought to be split out of gwt-user into a
separate jar. If there's no actual bug than I'm inclined to leave it
alone
16 matches
Mail list logo
