Hi everyone!
Are we supposed to be able to extend native (browser) JsTypes from Java?
Specifically, having the following declaration (from Elemental2):
@JsType(isNative = true, namespace = JsPackage.GLOBAL)
public class HTMLDivElement extends HTMLElement {...}
and the extending type
public
Hi!
I have this strange problem in SDM, where a method in the generated output
JS gets defined under a name, but gets referenced under another name.
I'll try to show it through actual compiled JS code vs original code.
function *getBoundingClientRect_3_g$*(this$static_0_g$,
mp folder before compile will help
>
>
> суббота, 17 декабря 2016 г., 0:49:30 UTC+3 пользователь Nándor Előd
> Fekete написал:
>>
>> Hi!
>>
>> I have this strange problem in SDM, where a method in the generated
>> output JS gets defined under a name, but
Hello Manuel,
wasn't Vaadin going into the direction of migrating it's client side
components to web components in the Vaadin Framework itself? If not, can
you shed some light on the motivation behind the decision?
Thanks!
On Friday, April 21, 2017 at 9:10:06 PM UTC+2, Manuel Carrasco wrote:
I think I have the same problem as you. See my earlier post on this
forum:
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/google-web-toolkit/rdoCr79EQbE/discussion
I wanted to file an issue about this problem, but I couldn't track down the
exact behavior of the GWT compiler when this happens (except the
anged andthe
> changes result in these conflicts.
>
> Marteijn
>
> Op donderdag 18 mei 2017 17:56:10 UTC+2 schreef Nándor Előd Fekete:
>>
>> I think I have the same problem as you. See my earlier post on this
>> forum:
>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/go
I had great success with https://github.com/nmorel/gwt-jackson, which is a
json library written for gwt that emulates much of jackson's functionality.
But note that it uses gwt generator infrastructure and hence is not
forward-compatible with future GWT3.
There's also
I needed portable code between client/server and polymorphism (through {
'type': 'SomeTypeIdentifier', ...other properties...}). Is there some
straightforward way to do that with jsinterop annotations?
On Monday, May 21, 2018 at 12:43:59 AM UTC+2, Thomas Broyer wrote:
>
> How about "just" using
The fix for this bug got backported to the 4.7 line of Eclipse. Will there
be a 2.8.3 GWT release and do you guys plan to upgrade to this version of
JDT if so?
On Monday, October 2, 2017 at 10:05:31 AM UTC+2, Ignacio Baca Moreno-Torres
wrote:
>
> Yep, IMO the best compromise between solution &
I am *really* interested. Can you sign me up?
On Thursday, March 8, 2018 at 9:13:01 AM UTC+1, Goktug Gokdogan wrote:
>
> The main blocker for releasing J2CL for wider audience is even basic
> missing functionalities around building it in open-source and seeing at
> least some output for your
10 matches
Mail list logo