Hi Earl,
I think best solution is for HtDig configuration to become more
flexible, and that is part of their development plan. If there are
problems in the meantime, I'll probably go ahead and patch
MHonArc. That's probably better asthetically than cluttering MHonArc's
feature space with the wor
On September 8, 1999 at 05:06, Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
> 4) Htdig will now index the attachments. I didn't really want this, but
>I also don't want the administrative headache of running a patched
>MHonArc or a patched htdig, which is required for this sort of
>functionality. I'll re
So what's going on?
1) Paul's latest date patches have been applied. (Thanks, Paul!)
2) A new rcfile for [EMAIL PROTECTED] has been added, and the
misdated raw email has been erased. The list will be rebuilt,
but not until I take care of a disk which is now at 99%
capacity.
3) A bunch
At 10:18 PM -0500 9/6/99, Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
>If I could say "Ignore everything that does not end in .html" or
>"only index URLs with a certain regexp" that would do the trick.
>But with the current configuration options, I just don't see how to do
>this.
There's a patch in the patch archiv
Hi htdig folks,
I'm having a bit of a problem getting what I want from the htdig
configuration options. Lots of people, myself included, use htdig in
conjunction with MHonArc. In the current release version of MHonArc
(2.4.3, which I recently upgraded to) attachments may be stored in
subdirector
On September 5, 1999 at 13:49, Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
> Paul, see how attachments end up in subdirectories, for example
> http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg00459.html
> The default rcfile puts attachments in a subdirectory, with a .dir
> extension. You are probably overriding the MIMEArgs directive, or
Hi Jeff,
I'm sorry you had problems with my previous date code - hope it hasn't
caused you much grief. I just didn't realise there were mail clients out
there which produced malformed date strings (well, ones that date(1) can't
read at least).
The last patch to mailme I sent was (again) incorre
First, sorry for all the folks who are planning to unsubscribe to
gossip due to the increase of traffic. My guess is things will die
down again within a week or three.
Paul, see how attachments end up in subdirectories, for example
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg00459.html
The d
Jeff Breidenbach said:
> Solution sets that I see are:
>
> b1) ask mailme to do monthly sorts off of x-archive-with-date
> headers primarily, received headers secondarily
> b2) modify bounce.pl to generate x-archive-with-date based on
> received headers.
Attached is b1), then.
Jeff said:
> I took a closer look. Attachments are never indexed because of
>
> echo "exclude_urls: .dir">> $CFG
I'm confused here: attachments don't appear in anything called *.dir,
but in a subdirectory called msg? for the relevant message - see
http:/
I took a closer look. Attachments are never indexed because of
echo "exclude_urls: .dir">> $CFG
so I now feel safe doing your original
-echo "limit_urls_to:$TARGET/$MAILLIST/" >> $CFG
+echo "limit_urls_to:$TARGET/$MAILLIST/ms
The problem has the following facets:
Computers with misset clocks screw up 'Date:'
MH's 'pick -before/-after' command probably uses 'Date:'
Imports emphasize the 'Date:' header
Importing by bounce adds an unhelpful 'Received:' header.
Solution sets that I see are:
a1) ask mailme to do m
Hi Jeff,
First off, I made a silly mistake in monthme - producing links to
html in subdirectories of course doesn't work, as none of the
relative links work. This is quickly solved by linking to the
directory instead which makes a lot more sense anyhow. The patch
I've attached (see below) fixes
Paul,
I applied your patch to the monthly index page generator -- and it
looks like quite an improvement. However, relying on the 'Date:'
header is definitely hurting, and something is inconsistant. This may
take some work, possibly including perhaps bounce.pl modifications.
See:
http://www.ma
Hi Jeff,
Some more mods to take care of monthly searching (which is currently
broken), and a couple of other suggested fixes. I've attached patches for
the following (I've diff'd these with the latest source you sent me - let
me know if you want the full versions):
monthme:
I think it lost the
>Your plan to allow monthly archives on mail-archive sounds really
>good.
The sorting engine already knows how to separate different lists from
each other; Paul's refinement was to narrow the definition of a list to
limit it to a one month timespan -- so to the sorting engine each
month is handl
Jeff,
A couple of belated comments back - you'll probably know the answers
to these already by now.
> I don't quite follow. Let's say there are a bunch of messages for
> 'sinister' in the inbox. So if it's current August 1999, we use pick
> to select just those messages from August 1999. But wh
>1. Firstly, I've dodged your question "Do we need to automatically detect
>very low traffic lists? How?" ! The generation of monthly indexes is
>simply triggered in my scheme by the presence of a file "monthly" in vault
>directory for a specific list.
That sounds extremely reasonable. Good ide
Hi Jeff,
Re. mods to allow mail-archive deal with some lists on a per-month basis.
I've had a good look and will send in a separate mail to you direct a
patched mailme.model for monthly indexes. Take a look and see what you
think and I'll have a think meantime about the rest of your system,
alth
19 matches
Mail list logo
