Re: [gpfsug-discuss] IBM Spectrum Scale transparent cloud tiering

2016-01-29 Thread serv...@metamodul.com
Hi Robert, i refered to your posting i assume ^_^ Note the following is from what I know, Since i did not had any change to work with GPFS in the last 2 years my knowledge will be outdated. The current GPFS tiering options depending on the DMAPI which i am not a big fan since it had in the

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] BM Spectrum Scale transparent cloud tiering

2016-01-29 Thread Oesterlin, Robert
Without getting into a whole lot of detail - The service is not based around the existing DMAPI interface. This service uses the Cluster Export Service (CES) nodes in GPFS 4.2 to perform the work. There is a process running on these nodes that’s configured to use a cloud provider and it

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] IBM Spectrum Scale transparent cloud tiering

2016-01-29 Thread Vic Cornell
Simon is right - we are using DMAPI to tier off to WOS our object store and to StrongBox NAS-fronted tape. We are very interested in the new “lightweight” protocols as they may allow us to do stuff that DMAPI makes hard - like tiering off to more than one DMAPI service from a single

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] IBM Spectrum Scale transparent cloud tiering

2016-01-29 Thread Simon Thompson (Research Computing - IT Services)
>Er no the DMAPI was only ever required for HSM as far as I am aware. Now >while HSM is a form of tiering, in GPFS parlance tiering generally >referred to disk pools of varying "speeds", with file placement and >movement being done via the policy engine. DMAPI can do more than just HSM though. I

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] IBM Spectrum Scale transparent cloud tiering

2016-01-29 Thread Daniel Kidger
Spectrum scale already supports external tiering to say tape. http://www.zurich.ibm.com/sto/systems/bigdata.html   Here the GPFS policy engine is used to select which files to migrate based on say the filesize or date of last access. The file metadata remains in the filesystem and so 'ls -l' etc

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] IBM Spectrum Scale transparent cloud tiering

2016-01-29 Thread Oesterlin, Robert
Hi Hajo I was involved in a closed beta of this service. You can read a bit more about it from the developer at this IBM DevelperWorks posting: https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/community/forums/html/topic?id=e9a43f16-4ab2-4edf-a253-83931840895e=25 If this doesn’t cover your questions, let me

[gpfsug-discuss] IBM Spectrum Scale transparent cloud tiering

2016-01-29 Thread serv...@metamodul.com
Hi i saw in the GPFS Forum somebody mentioning IBM Spectrum Scale transparent cloud tiering http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/servicemanagement/tc/gpfs/evaluate.html Thus the question. Does somebody knows how that - the tiering into clould services - is technical done and what limitations

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] IBM Spectrum Scale transparent cloud tiering

2016-01-29 Thread Oesterlin, Robert
Take a look at the new Transparent Cloud Tiering – it works with S3 and on-prem cloud as well – we have a local swift cluster and it’s works perfectly. Bob Oesterlin Sr Storage Engineer, Nuance HPC Grid From:

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] BM Spectrum Scale transparent cloud tiering

2016-01-29 Thread Marc A Kaplan
Since this official IBM website (pre)announces transparent cloud tiering ... http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/servicemanagement/tc/gpfs/evaluate.html?ce=sm6024=IBMSocial=M16402YW=h=BSYS=blog=casyst=us_tact=M16402YW And since Oesterlin mentioned Cluster Export Service (CES), please allow me to

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] migrating data from GPFS3.5 to ESS appliance(GPFS4.1)

2016-01-29 Thread Stijn De Weirdt
we wrapped something base on zookeeper around rsync to be able to use rsync in parallel by splitting the path in subdirectories, and distribute those https://github.com/hpcugent/vsc-zk works really well if the number of files in directories is somewhat balanced. we use it to rsync some gpfs