Re: [gpfsug-discuss] -Y option for many commands, precious few officially!

2017-03-28 Thread Jonathon A Anderson
8 March 2017 at 17:14 >To: "gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org" ><gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org> >Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] -Y option for many commands, precious >few officially! > > > >Just looki

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] -Y option for many commands, precious few officially!

2017-03-28 Thread Carl Zetie
u will continually have." Anonymous                - Original message -    From: Jonathon A Anderson <jonathon.ander...@colorado.edu>    Sent by: gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org    To: gpfsug main discussion list <gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org>    Cc:    Subject: Re:

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] -Y option for many commands, precious few officially!

2017-03-28 Thread Simon Thompson (Research Computing - IT Services)
gt;Kaplan <makap...@us.ibm.com> >Reply-To: "gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org" ><gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org> >Date: Tuesday, 28 March 2017 at 17:14 > To: "gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org" ><gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org> >Sub

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] -Y option for many commands, precious few officially!

2017-03-28 Thread Buterbaugh, Kevin L
-discuss@spectrumscale.org" > <gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org> >Date: Tuesday, 28 March 2017 at 17:14 > To: "gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org" <gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org> >Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] -Y option for many commands, precious

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] -Y option for many commands, precious few officially!

2017-03-28 Thread Simon Thompson (Research Computing - IT Services)
To: "gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org<mailto:gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org>" <gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org<mailto:gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org>> Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] -Y option for many commands, precious few officially! Just looking/scanning the lates

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] -Y option for many commands, precious few officially!

2017-03-28 Thread Luis Bolinches
have." Anonymous     - Original message -From: Jonathon A Anderson <jonathon.ander...@colorado.edu>Sent by: gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.orgTo: gpfsug main discussion list <gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org>Cc:Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] -Y option for many

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] -Y option for many commands, precious few officially!

2017-03-28 Thread Jonathon A Anderson
I had a bit of a run-in with a gpfs developer at a conference once when I complained about how command output changes frequently, breaking customer scripts. He was confused why we weren’t using `-Y`, and didn’t believe me that it’s simply not documented anywhere! `-Y` output is essential for

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] -Y option for many commands, precious few officially!

2017-03-28 Thread Marc A Kaplan
Just looking/scanning the latest (4.2.2) Spectrum Scale Command (and Programming) Reference I only found a few commands that officially are documented as supporting a -Y option: mmnfs, mmsmb, mmuserauth. But as many of you have discovered, -Y is accepted and yields "interesting" output for