Hi Suniba,
No, with gmx anaeig you can select -2d, which does a 2D projection onto the
selected eigenvectors. Alternatively, you can combine any two projections
onto eigenvectors, which you get using the option -proj. The quickest way
to do that is something like:
paste <(grep -v '^[@#]'
Hello everyone
I am using Gromacs 5.0 for protein-ligand MD. I want to do FEL analysis for the
stability of my pro-lig complex. In a 2015 paper, The group calculated two
principal component, PC1 and PC2 and then prepared an.xvg file to be used as
input for g_sham. My question is, when we use
Dear GROMACS users,
I am interested in the role of the mdp parameter pull-coord?-dim when
sampling
a particular umbrella window after having generated initial configurations
for, say, the
COM distance between two groups being the reaction coordinate.
I know that these options can be controlled
On 5/14/16 2:34 PM, Mark Abraham wrote:
Hi,
Please keep the discussion on the mailing list, so others can help and
learn.
Antara said:
I have pasted the mdrun command i used to run it in parallel with the
number of processors i used which was 16. The command is :
Dear Gromacs users,
I am trying to pull an ion out of a protein using Gromacs/5.0.4. I pull
the ion along specific pre-determined paths.
From my understanding, pulling along a direction _V guarantees that the
dumb bead would move only at direction _V. The position of the dumb bead
is
Hi,
Please keep the discussion on the mailing list, so others can help and
learn.
> Antara said:
> I have pasted the mdrun command i used to run it in parallel with the
number of processors i used which was 16. The command is :
>
>
>/app/setups/gromacs-5.1.1/build/bin -deffnm MD -pin on -rdd 1.8
I would use -dump to extract only the last frame,
I believe that what your are doing is saving your trajectory in a pdb file.
On 14 May 2016 at 16:21, Mark Abraham wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sure, but if you have a million frames, then you are probably doing
> something other
Hi,
Sure, but if you have a million frames, then you are probably doing
something other than what you want or should do. See
http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/How-tos/Reducing_Trajectory_Storage_Volume
Mark
On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 5:15 PM Upasana Ray wrote:
> I
I have modelled my protein using homology modeling software & then have
used gromacs for energy minimization.
gmx trjconv -f md22.xtc -s md22.tpr -o md22.pdb
then I have choosen only protein from the options
On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Pratiti Bhadra
wrote:
> How
Hi,
On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 1:09 PM wrote:
> In case it's relevant/interesting to anyone, here are the details on our
> cluster nodes:
>
> nodes # model # cores cpu model
> RAM node_type
> fmb01 - fmb33 33
Hi,
On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 4:34 PM Antara mazumdar
wrote:
> Dear users,
>
> I am trying to run a coarse grained simulation of a membrane protein in a
> mixed lipid billayer using martini model 2.2. I have already performed all
> the equilibration steps successfully on
Dear users,
I am trying to run a coarse grained simulation of a membrane protein in a
mixed lipid billayer using martini model 2.2. I have already performed all
the equilibration steps successfully on my desktop with GROMACS 5.1.0.
However, when i try to execute its production run in
In case it's relevant/interesting to anyone, here are the details on our
cluster nodes:
nodes # model # cores cpu model
RAM node_type
fmb01 - fmb33 33 IBM HS21XM 8 3 GHz Xeon
E5450
How many frames do u save using trjconv?. Can you please post your full
trjconv command here.
On 14 May 2016 18:21, "Chalaoux, Francois-Regis" <
francois-regis.chala...@evotec.com> wrote:
> What is your protein, PDB Id ?
>
> FR.
>
> > Le 14 mai 2016 à 12:04:09, Upasana Ray
What is your protein, PDB Id ?
FR.
> Le 14 mai 2016 à 12:04:09, Upasana Ray a écrit :
>
> yes I have removed water & the pdb file only contains protein
>
> On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 1:50 PM, Chalaoux, Francois-Regis <
> francois-regis.chala...@evotec.com> wrote:
>
>>
yes I have removed water & the pdb file only contains protein
On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 1:50 PM, Chalaoux, Francois-Regis <
francois-regis.chala...@evotec.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Did you removed Water ?
> Check also there is no other protein in the same file.
>
> FR.
>
> > Le 14 mai 2016 à
On 5/14/16 3:48 AM, Husen R wrote:
Hi,
Currently I'm running this tutorial (
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin/gmx-tutorials/lysozyme/08_MD.html)
to simulate restart with fewer nodes.
at restart, I changed the amount of nodes from 3 to 2 nodes.
I also changed the amount
On 5/14/16 2:25 AM, Ms. Nikita Bora wrote:
Respected Sir,
Recently i followed your tutorial for simulation of a 50 ns final mdrun of
protein-ligand complex where the value of rvdw=rcoulomb=1.4 was used. The
simulation runned at aorund 10 ns/day . While for the same complex when
Hi,
Did you removed Water ?
Check also there is no other protein in the same file.
FR.
> Le 14 mai 2016 à 07:04:15, Upasana Ray a écrit :
>
> Dear user,
>
> I have generated my final protein.pdb file by using trjconv command from
> .xtc file. The size of my pdb
Hi,
Currently I'm running this tutorial (
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin/gmx-tutorials/lysozyme/08_MD.html)
to simulate restart with fewer nodes.
at restart, I changed the amount of nodes from 3 to 2 nodes.
I also changed the amount of processes from 24 to 16 processes.
Respected Sir,
Recently i followed your tutorial for simulation of a 50 ns final mdrun of
protein-ligand complex where the value of rvdw=rcoulomb=1.4 was used. The
simulation runned at aorund 10 ns/day . While for the same complex when
rvdw=rcoulomb=1 is made the run was 10 ns/day.
Sir i would
Hi Upasana,
What is your goal, your research objective? 'opening it for docking
purpose' is way too vague for us to help you, other then suggesting that
you are probably not choosing an optimal approach.
Cheers,
Tsjerk
On May 14, 2016 07:04, "Upasana Ray" wrote:
>
22 matches
Mail list logo