Support adoption as a WG item. Willing to contribute text, reviews, etc.
Brian
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 10:17 AM Christopher Morrow <
christopher.mor...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Howdy WG Folks!
> There's been significant chatter on-list about:
> draft-mcbride-grow-as-path-prepend-01
>
> Abstract:
>
needs work and what better place than a working group?
randy
___
GROW mailing list
GROW@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
I understand that GROW is specific to Global Routing Operations at the current
time. Is the intention of the new charter to address BGP as a protocol when
explicitly dealing with routing state for standalone or inter-connected ... or
is the scope expanded to include BGP as it is currently
I support adoption and also left a few comments in a separate thread.
Best regards,
Martijn
From: GROW on behalf of Jakob Heitz (jheitz)
Sent: 29 July 2020 23:27
To: Christopher Morrow ; grow-...@tools.ietf.org
; ;
grow@ietf.org grow@ietf.org
Subject: Re:
On July 29, 2020 at 5:17:04 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 8:54 PM Alvaro Retana wrote:
Chris:
Hi!
...
> > - The use of "Internet networks" doesn't sound right...perhaps "Internet-
> > connected networks"? Looking at the rest of the charter, I assume that,
>
> Job an
I support adoption. Already gave comments in a separate thread.
Regards,
Jakob.
-Original Message-
From: GROW On Behalf Of Christopher Morrow
Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2020 10:17 AM
To: grow-...@tools.ietf.org; ;
grow@ietf.org grow@ietf.org
Subject: [GROW] [WG ADOPTION]:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 8:54 PM Alvaro Retana wrote:
>
> Job:
>
> Hi!
>
>
> Thanks for addressing my comments!
>
>
> I have just a couple more things:
>
> - The use of "Internet networks" doesn't sound right...perhaps "Internet-
> connected networks"? Looking at the rest of the charter, I
Job:
Hi!
Thanks for addressing my comments!
I have just a couple more things:
- The use of "Internet networks" doesn't sound right...perhaps "Internet-
connected networks"? Looking at the rest of the charter, I assume that,
for example, the operations of BGP in a non-Internet-connected
I support adoption too
(no hats)
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 05:19:07PM +, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> + the real slim-shady.
>
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 5:17 PM Christopher Morrow
> wrote:
> >
> > Howdy WG Folks!
> > There's been significant chatter on-list about:
> >
Christopher Morrow wrote on 29/07/2020 18:17:
This work seems directly in the GROW wheelhouse, and it appears folk
on-list agree. Let's decide with a WG Adoption call for this document
and see if we should continue this work officially/etc.
sounds good for adoption.
Nick
Hi all,
On 07/29, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> Howdy WG Folks!
> There's been significant chatter on-list about:
> draft-mcbride-grow-as-path-prepend-01
>
> Abstract:
> "AS_Path prepending provides a tool to manipulate the BGP AS_Path
>attribute through prepending multiple entries of an
Support
Thx,
r.
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 7:17 PM Christopher Morrow <
christopher.mor...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Howdy WG Folks!
> There's been significant chatter on-list about:
> draft-mcbride-grow-as-path-prepend-01
>
> Abstract:
> "AS_Path prepending provides a tool to manipulate the BGP
+ the real slim-shady.
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 5:17 PM Christopher Morrow
wrote:
>
> Howdy WG Folks!
> There's been significant chatter on-list about:
> draft-mcbride-grow-as-path-prepend-01
>
> Abstract:
> "AS_Path prepending provides a tool to manipulate the BGP AS_Path
>attribute
Howdy WG Folks!
There's been significant chatter on-list about:
draft-mcbride-grow-as-path-prepend-01
Abstract:
"AS_Path prepending provides a tool to manipulate the BGP AS_Path
attribute through prepending multiple entries of an AS. AS_Path
prepend is used to deprioritize a route or
Dear all,
Below is a third revision of the charter proposal, we attempted to
incorporate all the feedback received so far, specifically Alvaro's.
Please let us know your feedback!
Kind regards,
Job & Chris
--
Charter for Working Group
15 matches
Mail list logo
