Re: [GROW] Final feedback please - kirkham-private-ip-sp-cores

2011-10-10 Thread t.petch
Original Message - From: Anthony Kirkham tkirk...@cisco.com To: grow@ietf.org; grow-cha...@tools.ietf.org Sent: Friday, September 09, 2011 6:27 AM Subject: [GROW] Final feedback please - kirkham-private-ip-sp-cores All, I have just posted a new draft. There has only been one minor

Re: [GROW] Final feedback please - kirkham-private-ip-sp-cores

2011-10-05 Thread George, Wes
From: Anthony Kirkham [mailto:tkirk...@cisco.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2011 8:24 PM To: George, Wes; grow@ietf.org Subject: Re: [GROW] Final feedback please - kirkham-private-ip-sp-cores George, I have not included discuss of implications for an IS-IS hidden core. I agree with your

Re: [GROW] Final feedback please - kirkham-private-ip-sp-cores

2011-10-05 Thread Anthony Kirkham
Wes, That is a good suggestion and I will add it. Thanks Tony K On 5/10/11 10:54 PM, George, Wes wrote: *From:*Anthony Kirkham [mailto:tkirk...@cisco.com] *Sent:* Tuesday, October 04, 2011 8:24 PM *To:* George, Wes; grow@ietf.org *Subject:* Re: [GROW] Final feedback please - kirkham

Re: [GROW] Final feedback please - kirkham-private-ip-sp-cores

2011-10-04 Thread Anthony Kirkham
George, I have updated the draft with the extra example as you suggested. I do believe this adds to the clarity. I made note of the term 'squat space'. I have not included discuss of implications for an IS-IS hidden core. I agree with your comments,