On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 12:34 AM, Roland Dobbins
roland.dobb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Nov 29, 2011, at 2:50 AM, Robert Raszuk wrote:
I think we really need to have a way to determine PMTU in the cases of
switch in the middle having a mismatched value.
Shouldn't the root cause of PMTU-D
On Nov 29, 2011, at 10:07 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
it's not always the filtering of packet-too-big messages though, sometimes
it's filtering of the packet because the source isn't valid (1918 router
interfaces, to take a simple example)
Yes - so, should this document contain a precis
Support adoption. I think that the appropriate way to discuss this without
stepping on IEEE feet is exactly this sort of document, which simply recommends
a tacit agreement among folks who are already likely violating IEEE law on
the matter that they'll all violate it in the same way, and
Support adoption.
However I think while the draft is an interesting reading the crux of
the issue may/should be really in fixing the PMTU to the extend that if
I peer to N routers I should be able to tell exactly what the max path
MTU is by automation .. and not by guessing or calling the IX
Hello Robert,
I think we really need to have a way to determine PMTU in the cases of switch
in the middle having a mismatched value.
The experience shows that it's the IXPs customers that are misconfigured. A
quick check on NETNOD showed a few that were not correctly setup. This test
can
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Martin J. Levy mar...@he.net wrote:
BTW: I assume I don't upload a 01 version till after all the discussion is
done. Right? I have edits in based on this mailing list and other feedback.
All good stuff and worth editing in.
you could upload anytime... it'd
On Nov 17, 2011, at 9:11 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
Given the discussion in the room today, and the current doc:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mlevy-ixp-jumboframes-00
can we get a poll on the adoption for this document in GROW, is this
work that GROW should pursue?
Yes, the GROW
-Original Message-
From: grow-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:grow-boun...@ietf.org] On
Behalf Of Christopher Morrow
Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2011 12:11 AM
To: grow-cha...@tools.ietf.org; grow@ietf.org grow@ietf.org;
Martin J. Levy
Subject: [GROW] WG Adoption call for:
