Re: [grpc-io] Pointless for server to stay behind load balancer?

2016-10-03 Thread 'Eric Anderson' via grpc.io
The tracking issue is https://github.com/grpc/grpc/issues/7957 . The first resolution (#1) would be to add a timer to the server to send a GOAWAY after the connection is a certain age, allowing the proxy to choose another backend. I have an open question in that issue whether we also need an optio

Re: [grpc-io] Pointless for server to stay behind load balancer?

2016-09-22 Thread 'Kun Zhang' via grpc.io
If you are using Java, a proposed new LoadBalancer API should be able to solve your problem: https://github.com/grpc/grpc-java/issues/1600 It will allow LoadBalancer to create multiple connections for the same address. On Thursday, September 22, 2016 at 9:19:56 AM UTC-7, idan...@gmail.com wrot

Re: [grpc-io] Pointless for server to stay behind load balancer?

2016-09-22 Thread idan . yael
Hi, Found this thread while searching for an answer to the same issue... I am doing the same implementation, having a client that is directed to a kubernetes service (DNS discovery) and I have noticed that all calls are going to the same server. This is a single client with multiple servers behin