Emmanuel Briot wrote:
>> Actually, I meant to do that too, but must have forgotten.
>> I agree, we should only show bindings up to the version we support
>> perhaps (is that 2.6 or 2.8? I can't remember).
>>
>> This list is not updated by anyone except us though. The problem is
>> that it will defi
Cody Russell wrote:
> While you guys are talking about website stuff again, on a side note I
> want to mention the information about IRC stuff on the webpage:
>
> http://www.gtk.org/development.html
>
> This page mentions #gtk-devel as a place where team meetings occur, but
> there has been a lot
While you guys are talking about website stuff again, on a side note I
want to mention the information about IRC stuff on the webpage:
http://www.gtk.org/development.html
This page mentions #gtk-devel as a place where team meetings occur, but
there has been a lot of traffic to this channel recent
Murray Cumming wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 15:44 +0100, Emmanuel Briot wrote:
>
>>> Actually, I meant to do that too, but must have forgotten.
>>> I agree, we should only show bindings up to the version we support
>>> perhaps (is that 2.6 or 2.8? I can't remember).
>>>
>>> This list is not up
Alberto Ruiz wrote:
> 2008/3/26, Martyn Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Alberto Ruiz wrote:
>>> 2008/3/26, Martyn Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi Murray,
I have to say, first and foremost, I agree with Micke. The language
bindings are about other languages which are available fo
On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 15:44 +0100, Emmanuel Briot wrote:
> > Actually, I meant to do that too, but must have forgotten.
> > I agree, we should only show bindings up to the version we support
> > perhaps (is that 2.6 or 2.8? I can't remember).
> >
> > This list is not updated by anyone except us th
> Actually, I meant to do that too, but must have forgotten.
> I agree, we should only show bindings up to the version we support
> perhaps (is that 2.6 or 2.8? I can't remember).
>
> This list is not updated by anyone except us though. The problem is
> that it will definitely become out of date u
2008/3/26, Martyn Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Alberto Ruiz wrote:
> > 2008/3/26, Martyn Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >>
> >> Hi Murray,
> >>
> >> I have to say, first and foremost, I agree with Micke. The language
> >> bindings are about other languages which are available for use with
> >>
Alberto Ruiz wrote:
> 2008/3/26, Martyn Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>> Hi Murray,
>>
>> I have to say, first and foremost, I agree with Micke. The language
>> bindings are about other languages which are available for use with
>> GTK+. This is not GNOME. I really think having a small GNOME foot
2008/3/26, Martyn Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> Hi Murray,
>
> I have to say, first and foremost, I agree with Micke. The language
> bindings are about other languages which are available for use with
> GTK+. This is not GNOME. I really think having a small GNOME foot (or
> another icon) for i
Murray Cumming wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 17:26 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
>> On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 15:41 +, Martyn Russell wrote:
>>> We are not ignoring it, it is a planned change. There are one or two and
>>> we have had quite a few improvement requests since going live - we will
>>> b
On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 11:35 +0100, Mikael Hallendal wrote:
> 26 mar 2008 kl. 11.10 skrev Murray Cumming:
>
> Hi,
>
> > On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 10:18 +0100, Mikael Hallendal wrote:
> >> 25 mar 2008 kl. 08.58 skrev Murray Cumming:
> >> but it's not given and GTK+ is not only for GNOME. The GNOME
> >>
26 mar 2008 kl. 11.10 skrev Murray Cumming:
Hi,
> On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 10:18 +0100, Mikael Hallendal wrote:
>> 25 mar 2008 kl. 08.58 skrev Murray Cumming:
>> but it's not given and GTK+ is not only for GNOME. The GNOME
>> bindings include (and require) a wider set of library bindings than
>> G
On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 10:18 +0100, Mikael Hallendal wrote:
> 25 mar 2008 kl. 08.58 skrev Murray Cumming:
>
> Hi,
>
> > On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 17:26 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
> >> On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 15:41 +, Martyn Russell wrote:
> >>> Murray Cumming wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 13
25 mar 2008 kl. 08.58 skrev Murray Cumming:
Hi,
> On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 17:26 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
>> On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 15:41 +, Martyn Russell wrote:
>>> Murray Cumming wrote:
On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 13:16 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
> And I still believe that the officia
On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 17:26 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 15:41 +, Martyn Russell wrote:
> > Murray Cumming wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 13:16 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
> > >> And I still believe that the official GNOME bindings deserve to be in
> > >> a
> > >>
Nice!
Having SVG allows to produce nearly all other formats so that's OK.
One possible addition could be some icon sized PNGs (tweaked for small
size). If I have some time I'll try make them and post them on l.g.o.
Christophe
On Jan 30, 2008 1:11 PM, Andreas Nilsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 05:26:33PM +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
> > This link will have to be kept up to date, if this is the link to use,
> > it would be better to have a more permanent link that doesn't change
> > with new versions of GNOME (which we used to have).
>
> Theoretically,
> http://w
Murray Cumming wrote:
> > what is most unfortunate is that library.g.o only has glib development
> > docs, but not gtk development docs.
>
> That's probably because there are no tarball releases of GTK+ from svn
> trunk at the moment. library.gnome.org can only use tarballs, I believe.
That is t
On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 15:41 +, Martyn Russell wrote:
> Murray Cumming wrote:
> > On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 13:16 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
> >> And I still believe that the official GNOME bindings deserve to be in
> >> a
> >> separate section.
> >
> > I see that the site is live already. Pleas
Murray Cumming wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 13:16 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
>> And I still believe that the official GNOME bindings deserve to be in
>> a
>> separate section.
>
> I see that the site is live already. Please don't just ignore this
> regression. I've mentioned it before too.
Hi
On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 13:16 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
>
> And I still believe that the official GNOME bindings deserve to be in
> a
> separate section.
I see that the site is live already. Please don't just ignore this
regression. I've mentioned it before too.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.murray
Andreas Nilsson wrote:
> Christophe Dehais wrote:
>
>> Talking about the logo (which is very nice - simple and cool, like gtk
>> :)), what about a page where one's could get it in different formats
>> (svg, png, icon sized, etc.) ?
>>
>>
> Hi Christophe!
> Sounds like something that shou
Claudio Saavedra wrote:
> El dom, 27-01-2008 a las 23:37 +, Martyn Russell escribió:
>> The plan is to upload these pages on Tuesday sometime. If anyone has
>> any issues to take up before then, let me know.
>
> A small correction. In documentation.html
>
> "GTK+ 2.0 Tree View
> This tutorial
El dom, 27-01-2008 a las 23:37 +, Martyn Russell escribió:
>
> The plan is to upload these pages on Tuesday sometime. If anyone has
> any issues to take up before then, let me know.
A small correction. In documentation.html
"GTK+ 2.0 Tree View
This tutorial covers the GtkTreeView and was wr
On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 15:46 +0100, Tim Janik wrote:
[snip]
> what is most unfortunate is that library.g.o only has glib development
> docs, but not gtk development docs.
That's probably because there are no tarball releases of GTK+ from svn
trunk at the moment. library.gnome.org can only use tarba
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008, Olav Vitters wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 02:30:14PM +, Martyn Russell wrote:
>>> http://imendio.com/~martyn/gtk/draft-final/download-linux.html
>>> * outdated versions
>>
>> You disagree? It might not make sense to list unsupported versions here
>> I agree, but we sh
Michael L Torrie (sorta) wrote:
> I'm always amused by people who have big, hires screens and want to
> maximize windows. In my opinion, on a 20" wide screen, I want
> layouts to be narrow enough to be in a nice tall window that's narrow
> enough to allow easy reading.
It's funny that you use
Philippe De Swert wrote:
> What annoys me the most (especially on my wide-screen monitor) is that I have
> a very thin GTK+ website which requires me to scroll down a lot. And I don't
> like to have to view a website in 10:16 screen as it is quite unpractical. It
> is pretty hard to swivel a 22" sc
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 02:30:14PM +, Martyn Russell wrote:
> > http://imendio.com/~martyn/gtk/draft-final/download-linux.html
> > * outdated versions
>
> You disagree? It might not make sense to list unsupported versions here
> I agree, but we should definitely list older versions.
No, I me
Vincent Untz wrote:
> Le lundi 28 janvier 2008, à 01:25 +0100, Andreas Nilsson a écrit :
>> Olav Vitters wrote:
>>> http://imendio.com/~martyn/gtk/draft-final/development.html
>>> * links to [EMAIL PROTECTED] for donation things, shouldn't
>>>that rather use some private email address? IIRC th
Olav Vitters wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 11:37:47PM +, Martyn Russell wrote:
> Looks great. Tried to find very small things to note (nothing important):
>
> http://imendio.com/~martyn/gtk/draft-final/index.html
> * LGPL link is the v3 one
Fixed.
> http://imendio.com/~martyn/gtk/draft-f
Christophe Dehais wrote:
> Hi !
>
> On Jan 28, 2008 10:48 AM, Martyn Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>> Logo: fresh look, I like it. However, it looks slightly distorted to me,
>>> if it is supposed to resemble a perfect cube. As you know, all parallel
>>> lines in a perspective projecti
Philippe De Swert wrote:
>> The new site look great. A few nit picks:
>>
>> features.html
>> * Language Bindings
>> Missing 2.12 column which should contain: gtkmm, pygtk, java-gnome, gtk2perl.
>> * Foundations
>> Missing new features from GIO and also GObject
What about GModule, GFoo, GBar, GWhat
Hi,
> >
> > The final draft of the new GTK+ web site has been complete with help
> > from Andreas Nilsson and are now available here:
> >
> > http://imendio.com/~martyn/gtk/draft-final/
Nice work!
> > The plan is to upload these pages on Tuesday sometime. If anyone has any
> > issues to tak
On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 09:26 -0200, Johan Dahlin wrote:
> Martyn Russell wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The final draft of the new GTK+ web site has been complete with help
> > from Andreas Nilsson and are now available here:
> >
> > http://imendio.com/~martyn/gtk/draft-final/
> >
> > The plan is to u
Martyn Russell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The final draft of the new GTK+ web site has been complete with help
> from Andreas Nilsson and are now available here:
>
> http://imendio.com/~martyn/gtk/draft-final/
>
> The plan is to upload these pages on Tuesday sometime. If anyone has any
> issues to take
28 jan 2008 kl. 10.48 skrev Martyn Russell:
Hi,
> Bastiaan Veelo wrote:
>
>> Logo: fresh look, I like it. However, it looks slightly distorted
>> to me,
>> if it is supposed to resemble a perfect cube. As you know, all
>> parallel
>> lines in a perspective projection share a common vanishing
Le lundi 28 janvier 2008, à 01:27 +0100, Andreas Nilsson a écrit :
> Vincent Untz wrote:
> > Le dimanche 27 janvier 2008, à 23:37 +, Martyn Russell a écrit :
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> The final draft of the new GTK+ web site has been complete with help
> >> from Andreas Nilsson and are now avai
Le lundi 28 janvier 2008, à 01:25 +0100, Andreas Nilsson a écrit :
> Olav Vitters wrote:
> > http://imendio.com/~martyn/gtk/draft-final/development.html
> > * links to [EMAIL PROTECTED] for donation things, shouldn't
> >that rather use some private email address? IIRC there is a
> >better
Hi !
On Jan 28, 2008 10:48 AM, Martyn Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Logo: fresh look, I like it. However, it looks slightly distorted to me,
> > if it is supposed to resemble a perfect cube. As you know, all parallel
> > lines in a perspective projection share a common vanishing point.
Bastiaan Veelo wrote:
> Hi,
Hi,
> First off: congratulations with a clean site, good first impressions. I
> am not a GTK+ dev, but I happened to see your post and take the liberty
> to share my small comments.
Thanks, it has taken long enough :)
> Logo: fresh look, I like it. However, it looks
Hi,
First off: congratulations with a clean site, good first impressions. I
am not a GTK+ dev, but I happened to see your post and take the liberty
to share my small comments.
Logo: fresh look, I like it. However, it looks slightly distorted to me,
if it is supposed to resemble a perfect cube.
Andreas Nilsson wrote:
> Olav Vitters wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 11:37:47PM +, Martyn Russell wrote:
>>
>> http://imendio.com/~martyn/gtk/draft-final/
>>
>> http://imendio.com/~martyn/gtk/draft-final/documentation.html
>> * under API, perhaps s/Library/Component/ or somet
Martyn Russell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The final draft of the new GTK+ web site has been complete with help
> from Andreas Nilsson and are now available here:
>
> http://imendio.com/~martyn/gtk/draft-final/
>
> The plan is to upload these pages on Tuesday sometime. If anyone has any
> issues to take
[snip]
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 01:25:51AM +0100, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
> > http://imendio.com/~martyn/gtk/draft-final/features.html
> > * no n810
> >
> Latest and greatest should totally be there. Perhaps we should only use
> the n810 there. Saying only the N-series would save us from fixing
Vincent Untz wrote:
> Le dimanche 27 janvier 2008, à 23:37 +, Martyn Russell a écrit :
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> The final draft of the new GTK+ web site has been complete with help
>> from Andreas Nilsson and are now available here:
>>
>> http://imendio.com/~martyn/gtk/draft-final/
>>
>> The plan is
Olav Vitters wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 11:37:47PM +, Martyn Russell wrote:
>
>> The final draft of the new GTK+ web site has been complete with help
>> from Andreas Nilsson and are now available here:
>>
>> http://imendio.com/~martyn/gtk/draft-final/
>>
>> The plan is to upload thes
Le dimanche 27 janvier 2008, à 23:37 +, Martyn Russell a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> The final draft of the new GTK+ web site has been complete with help
> from Andreas Nilsson and are now available here:
>
> http://imendio.com/~martyn/gtk/draft-final/
>
> The plan is to upload these pages on Tuesda
On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 11:37:47PM +, Martyn Russell wrote:
> The final draft of the new GTK+ web site has been complete with help
> from Andreas Nilsson and are now available here:
>
> http://imendio.com/~martyn/gtk/draft-final/
>
> The plan is to upload these pages on Tuesday sometime. If
On Sun, 2008-01-27 at 23:37 +, Martyn Russell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The final draft of the new GTK+ web site has been complete with help
> from Andreas Nilsson and are now available here:
>
> http://imendio.com/~martyn/gtk/draft-final/
it's very, very cool. kudos to you and Andreas: you lot di
Hi,
The final draft of the new GTK+ web site has been complete with help
from Andreas Nilsson and are now available here:
http://imendio.com/~martyn/gtk/draft-final/
The plan is to upload these pages on Tuesday sometime. If anyone has any
issues to take up before then, let me know.
--
Regard
52 matches
Mail list logo
