On 9/20/23 4:12 PM, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
To conclude, I'm not advocating for adding OCI-backed services to Guix
mainstream: in my opinion they should be bootstrapped and
built from source, but I believe the actual "backend" implementation for such
services could be useful to have in Guix.
For a submitted patch, if Guix QA "fails to process revision" as in this log
https://data.qa.guix.gnu.org/job/49399
[ 32/ 40] compiling... 60.0% of 20 filesmadvise failed: Cannot allocate memory
builder for `/gnu/store/j3hy5gymlfrdrhm8aj2brnsa2pix16n2-guix-home.drv'
failed due to signal 11
Hi,
> I was recently inspired from Nix's oci-container feature and wrote a thin
> wrapper around the docker CLI to enable the management of
> docker containers through Shepherd [0]. This enables handling of non packaged
> services through guix system reconfigure and herd
> start/stop/status .
Hi Simon,
Simon Tournier writes:
> I would add the questions as:
>
> + the kind of contributions: patches, translation, bug report,
> discussions on guix-devel or help-guix, else
>
> + the number of contributions using some ranges 1, [2-9], [10-100], 100+
>
> + channels of communication:
Hi,
Simon Tournier writes:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 19 Sep 2023 at 18:35, Giovanni Biscuolo wrote:
>
>> I'm also suspecting that the spark that started the "Guix Bang" in
>> Ludovic's mind, the very moment he realized nix could be better
>> _extended_ using Guile in place of it's DSL, was /caused/ by
Not seen mentioned on this mailing list yet, so probably of interest:
GSOC project's final report:
https://blog.lispy.tech/parameterized-packages-the-project-completion-update.html
Hi Simon,
Simon Tournier writes:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, 17 Sep 2023 at 16:51, Maxim Cournoyer
> wrote:
>
>> If you use Emacs and Emacs-Debbugs, you may be interested in applying
>> the settings newly documented in the 'Viewing Bugs within Emacs' section
>> of the manual; see it at the bottom of
Hi, for some reason emacs has become the elephant in the room of the
discussion on contributing to guix.
Regardless of one's opinion of emacs, I just want to add that this is
itself strange. I have contributed some (package definition) patches
to guix, all without using emacs.
I am not an emacs
Hi,
Really cool! Thank you.
On Sat, 16 Sep 2023 at 14:59, Wilko Meyer wrote:
> I identified a few key themes that could be useful for a guix user
> survey as well. I plan on doing a more extensive summary on this later
> this weekend if my time allows it, for now a loose collection of
>
Dear Guixers,
I was recently inspired from Nix's oci-container feature and wrote a
thin wrapper around the docker CLI to enable the management of docker
containers through Shepherd [0]. This enables handling of non packaged
services through guix system reconfigure and herd start/stop/status .
On 9/20/23 17:03, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
MSavoritias writes:
On 9/20/23 11:45, Nguyễn Gia Phong via Development of GNU Guix and the
GNU System distribution. wrote:
On 2023-09-20 at 10:21+02:00, Csepp wrote:
It's better if we have at least one *well documented* developer setup,
than if we
MSavoritias writes:
> On 9/20/23 11:45, Nguyễn Gia Phong via Development of GNU Guix and the
> GNU System distribution. wrote:
>> On 2023-09-20 at 10:21+02:00, Csepp wrote:
>>> It's better if we have at least one *well documented* developer setup,
>>> than if we have a bunch of (sometimes
On 9/20/23 11:45, Nguyễn Gia Phong via Development of GNU Guix and the
GNU System distribution. wrote:
On 2023-09-20 at 10:21+02:00, Csepp wrote:
It's better if we have at least one *well documented* developer setup,
than if we have a bunch of (sometimes conflicting) partial docs
for setting
On 2023-09-20 at 10:21+02:00, Csepp wrote:
> It's better if we have at least one *well documented* developer setup,
> than if we have a bunch of (sometimes conflicting) partial docs
> for setting up certain subsystems.
>
> Emacs can be pretty good, once you do (setq make-defaults-not-suck 1)
> a
Giovanni Biscuolo writes:
> [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]]
> Hello,
>
> ...I'm talking about Emacs.
>
> In <87bkdzssgm@gmail.com> [1] Simon Tournier
> writes:
>
> [1] https://yhetil.org/guix/87bkdzssgm@gmail.com/
>
> [...]
>
>> people are already engaging for improving the
zamfofex writes:
> Hello, Guix! I have recently worked on a WebAssembly target (for
> cross‐compilation) for Guix. It’s still in very early stages and thus
> fairly lacking, but it is enough to cross‐compile certain simple
> packages such as ‘lolcat’.
>
> Maybe people might find it useful
Hi Chris,
Thanks for the update, always nice!
On Wed, 26 Jul 2023 at 09:44, Christopher Baines wrote:
> The queue is very large at [3].
Some patches trigger a lot of rebuilds. And the threshold is about 300
or something, I guess. Would it be possible to mark these items?
For instance,
Hi,
On Tue, 19 Sep 2023 at 18:35, Giovanni Biscuolo wrote:
> I'm also suspecting that the spark that started the "Guix Bang" in
> Ludovic's mind, the very moment he realized nix could be better
> _extended_ using Guile in place of it's DSL, was /caused/ by the fact he
> was a Lisp programmer,
18 matches
Mail list logo