Hello,
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Hello Guix,
>
> Ludovic Courtès skribis:
>
>> Which means I’ll merge ‘staging’ in ‘master’ tomorrow morning if nothing
>> has collapsed by then. :-)
>
> Merged, enjoy! :-)
Nice!
> Thanks to everyone who helped on the way!
Thank you for merging the
Hello Guix,
Ludovic Courtès skribis:
> Which means I’ll merge ‘staging’ in ‘master’ tomorrow morning if nothing
> has collapsed by then. :-)
Merged, enjoy! :-)
Thanks to everyone who helped on the way!
Next up: release and ‘core-updates’.
Ludo’.
Hi,
Efraim Flashner skribis:
> Let's do it
S… turns out commit e31ab8c24848a7691a838af8df61d3e7097cddbc on
‘master’ unwillingly triggered a rebuild of 2K packages.
It’s too late to revert (they’ve been built anyway), but I’ve merged
‘master’ in ‘staging’ so they can be built there.
Which
Hi,
Thiago Jung Bauermann skribis:
> Sorry for the delay. I've built some packages from the staging branch on
> powerpc64le-linux (including Emacs, which brings in a lot of stuff) and
> it seems good.
That’s good news, thanks for testing!
Ludo’.
Hello,
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> ‘guix weather -s i686-linux’ says 89% (which is underestimated, because
> it wrongfully checks for all the packages, including unsupported
> packages), which sounds good.
>
> We have to check for AArch64 & co. Any takers?
Sorry for the delay. I've built some
On June 11, 2022 9:53:14 AM UTC, "Ludovic Courtès" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Efraim Flashner skribis:
>
>> My main concern is that so few of the missing items are queued to be
>> built.
>
>I wonder if that info is accurate.
>
>For instance, https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/716980/details shows the
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> It went from 17.1% to 17.3% in two days, even though the AArch64
> machines have been busy all along it seems. Maybe they’ve been
> processing the backlog that had accumulated on ‘master’ rather than the
> things we care about.
Per https://issues.guix.gnu.org/55848,
Hi,
Efraim Flashner skribis:
> My main concern is that so few of the missing items are queued to be
> built.
I wonder if that info is accurate.
For instance, https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/716980/details shows the
derivation for /gnu/store/2smylcjq5cppxcrj2mn229hlmh6bf7w4-libxft-2.3.3.
It is
On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 09:02:14PM +0200, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) wrote:
> I will try again with staging at 091eb323ba27. But it will take a
> long time; feel free to proceed regardless.
All my manifest built and runs on rock64 aarch64. Thank you all!
Regards,
Florian
On Wed, Jun 08, 2022 at 11:24:22PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hey Efraim,
>
> Efraim Flashner skribis:
>
> > On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 11:17:47PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Ludovic Courtès skribis:
> >>
> >> ‘guix weather -s i686-linux’ says 89% (which is
On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 09:02:14PM +0200, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) wrote:
> I will try again with staging at 091eb323ba27.
llvm@11 was built successfully. Sorry for the noise.
Regards,
Florian
On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 08:41:21PM +0300, Efraim Flashner wrote:
> I know I've built llvm@11 and mesa on aarch64 hardware for staging.
Oh I see I'm missing the last merge; I'm still at commit b422687cbd.
I will try again with staging at 091eb323ba27. But it will take a
long time; feel free to
On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 07:19:30PM +0200, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 11:17:47PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> > We have to check for AArch64 & co. Any takers?
> >
> > Overall it seems to me we should be able to merge ‘staging’ within a
> > couple of days.
On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 11:17:47PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> We have to check for AArch64 & co. Any takers?
>
> Overall it seems to me we should be able to merge ‘staging’ within a
> couple of days. Thoughts?
>
> Ludo’.
>
I mostly succeeded in updating my rock64 aarch64 machine
guix
Hey Efraim,
Efraim Flashner skribis:
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 11:17:47PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Ludovic Courtès skribis:
>>
>> ‘guix weather -s i686-linux’ says 89% (which is underestimated, because
>> it wrongfully checks for all the packages, including unsupported
>>
On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 11:17:47PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Ludovic Courtès skribis:
>
> ‘guix weather -s i686-linux’ says 89% (which is underestimated, because
> it wrongfully checks for all the packages, including unsupported
> packages), which sounds good.
>
> We have to
Hi,
Mark H Weaver skribis:
> Mark H Weaver writes:
>
>> Efraim Flashner writes:
>>
>>> So I think I'd like to see a comparison on hydra of staging vs master
>>> and if it's good enough we go ahead and merge
>>
>> I just asked Hydra to produce another evaluation of 'staging'. When it
>> has
Mark H Weaver writes:
> Efraim Flashner writes:
>
>> So I think I'd like to see a comparison on hydra of staging vs master
>> and if it's good enough we go ahead and merge
>
> I just asked Hydra to produce another evaluation of 'staging'. When it
> has finished doing so, we'll know more.
Hello!
Efraim Flashner skribis:
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 03:58:09PM +0100, Julien Lepiller wrote:
>> Hi Guix,
>>
>> I'd like to get staging merged soon, as it wasn't for quite some time. Here
>> are some stats about the current state of substitutes for staging:
>>
>> According to guix
On January 9, 2019 7:15:56 PM UTC, Mark H Weaver wrote:
>Hi Efraim,
>
>Efraim Flashner writes:
>
>> I merged master into staging today and got the following chart:
>>
>> | architecture | berlin | hydra |
>> +--++---+
>> | x86_64 | 42.2% | 78.8% |
>> | i686
Hi Efraim,
Efraim Flashner writes:
> I merged master into staging today and got the following chart:
>
> | architecture | berlin | hydra |
> +--++---+
> | x86_64 | 42.2% | 78.8% |
> | i686 | 28.2% | 64.3% |
> | aarch64 | 0% | 23.0% |
> | armhf
On Sun, Dec 23, 2018 at 04:00:48PM +0200, Efraim Flashner wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 03:58:09PM +0100, Julien Lepiller wrote:
> > Hi Guix,
> >
> > I'd like to get staging merged soon, as it wasn't for quite some time. Here
> > are some stats about the current state of substitutes for
On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 03:58:09PM +0100, Julien Lepiller wrote:
> Hi Guix,
>
> I'd like to get staging merged soon, as it wasn't for quite some time. Here
> are some stats about the current state of substitutes for staging:
>
> According to guix weather, we have:
>
> | architecture | berlin |
Hello Mark,
Mark H Weaver skribis:
> It's a good question. I have several hypotheses:
These are all valid but there’s a couple more to consider. ;-)
Specifically we’ve had ENOSPC issues on some build nodes lately, and as
I wrote elsewhere, ‘guix offload’ would report them as “permanent
Hello,
2018. dec. 21., P 2:18 dátummal Mark H Weaver ezt írta:
> Hi Julien,
>
> I've rearranged your reply from "top-posting" style to "bottom-posting"
> style. Please consider using bottom-posting in the future.
>
> I wrote:
>
> > Julien Lepiller writes:
> >
> >> I'd like to get staging
Hi Julien,
I've rearranged your reply from "top-posting" style to "bottom-posting"
style. Please consider using bottom-posting in the future.
I wrote:
> Julien Lepiller writes:
>
>> I'd like to get staging merged soon, as it wasn't for quite some
>> time. Here are some stats about the current
I agree, but I wonder if there is a reason for these to be so low?
Le 20 décembre 2018 19:36:54 GMT+01:00, Mark H Weaver a écrit
:
>Hi Julien,
>
>Julien Lepiller writes:
>
>> I'd like to get staging merged soon, as it wasn't for quite some
>> time. Here are some stats about the current state
Hi Julien,
Julien Lepiller writes:
> I'd like to get staging merged soon, as it wasn't for quite some
> time. Here are some stats about the current state of substitutes for
> staging:
>
> According to guix weather, we have:
>
> | architecture | berlin | hydra |
>
28 matches
Mail list logo
