Re: Clarifying blog post licensing

Hi Ludovic, Ludovic Courtès writes: > Hi, > > Maxim Cournoyer skribis: > >> Ludovic Courtès writes: >> >>> Hello Guix! >>> >>> With a few exceptions, our blog posts do not have a license, which is >>> not great as it prevents sharing and reuse, at least by those outside >>> Guix circles (we

Re: Clarifying blog post licensing

Hi, Vagrant Cascadian skribis: > Just for clarity, do you mean the GFDL with a laundry-list of non-free > anti-features excluded, like the guix manual: > > Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document > under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version

Re: Clarifying blog post licensing

Hi, Maxim Cournoyer skribis: > Ludovic Courtès writes: > >> Hello Guix! >> >> With a few exceptions, our blog posts do not have a license, which is >> not great as it prevents sharing and reuse, at least by those outside >> Guix circles (we discussed it in the past but never got around to

Re: Clarifying blog post licensing

January 27, 2022 12:59 AM, "Jan Nieuwenhuizen" wrote: > Ludovic Courtès writes: > >> With a few exceptions, our blog posts do not have a license, which is >> not great > I agree. Joshua Branson. > -- > Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org > Freelance IT

Re: Clarifying blog post licensing

I agree. pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) ezt írta (időpont: 2022. jan. 27., Cs 18:35): > I agree. > > On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 10:24:11AM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > > Hello Guix! > > > > With a few exceptions, our blog posts do not have a license, which is > > not great as it prevents sharing

Re: Clarifying blog post licensing

I agree. On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 10:24:11AM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Hello Guix! > > With a few exceptions, our blog posts do not have a license, which is > not great as it prevents sharing and reuse, at least by those outside > Guix circles (we discussed it in the past but never got

Re: Clarifying blog post licensing

Ludovic Courtès writes: > With a few exceptions, our blog posts do not have a license, which is > not great Good catch, I agree! Janneke -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.com

Re: Clarifying blog post licensing

Vagrant Cascadian 写道： Just for clarity, do you mean the GFDL with a laundry-list of non-free anti-features excluded, like the guix manual: I think that goes without saying, but clarity is good: thanks for bringing it up. Invariants would be a deal-breaker for several of us I'm sure,

Re: Clarifying blog post licensing

On 2022-01-26, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > With a few exceptions, our blog posts do not have a license, which is > not great as it prevents sharing and reuse, at least by those outside > Guix circles (we discussed it in the past but never got around to fixing > it). > > I’d like us to clarify that,

Re: Clarifying blog post licensing

How does that sound? Excellent. Thanks! T G-R signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Clarifying blog post licensing

Hello, Ludovic Courtès writes: > Hello Guix! > > With a few exceptions, our blog posts do not have a license, which is > not great as it prevents sharing and reuse, at least by those outside > Guix circles (we discussed it in the past but never got around to fixing > it). > > I’d like us to

Re: Clarifying blog post licensing

Ludovic Courtès writes: > With a few exceptions, our blog posts do not have a license, which is > not great as it prevents sharing and reuse, at least by those outside > Guix circles (we discussed it in the past but never got around to fixing > it). > > I’d like us to clarify that, with a

Re: Clarifying blog post licensing

Me too. -- Kinds regards Oliver Propst https://twitter.com/Opropst

Re: Clarifying blog post licensing

On January 26, 2022 10:24:11 AM GMT+01:00, "Ludovic Courtès" wrote: >Hello Guix! > >With a few exceptions, our blog posts do not have a license, which is >not great as it prevents sharing and reuse, at least by those outside >Guix circles (we discussed it in the past but never got around to

Re: Clarifying blog post licensing

On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 10:24:11AM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Hello Guix! > > With a few exceptions, our blog posts do not have a license, which is > not great as it prevents sharing and reuse, at least by those outside > Guix circles (we discussed it in the past but never got around to

Re: Clarifying blog post licensing

I agree! On 1/26/22 11:24, Ludovic Courtès wrote: Hello Guix! With a few exceptions, our blog posts do not have a license, which is not great as it prevents sharing and reuse, at least by those outside Guix circles (we discussed it in the past but never got around to fixing it). I’d like us

Re: New blog post on the Guix Build Coordinator: Building derivations, how complicated can it be?

Thanks Christopher, Mathieu & Ludo to help us understand what's going on -- Vincent Legoll

Re: New blog post on the Guix Build Coordinator: Building derivations, how complicated can it be?

Hello! Mathieu Othacehe skribis: > We have already discussed the Cuirass vs Build coordinator situation in > the past. I haven't changed by mind on that subject. The Guix Build > Coordinator is more or less the equivalent of the Cuirass remote build > mechanism[2]. Yes. So to answer Vincent’s

Re: New blog post on the Guix Build Coordinator: Building derivations, how complicated can it be?

Hello, > On Sat, Apr 24, 2021 at 11:10 AM Christopher Baines wrote: >> I did think about trying to include something about Cuirass, but I don't >> have a clear picture of it's scope or purpose, so I'm not really the >> right person to attempt to write authoritatively about it. > > OK, fair

Re: New blog post on the Guix Build Coordinator: Building derivations, how complicated can it be?

On Sat, Apr 24, 2021 at 11:10 AM Christopher Baines wrote: > I did think about trying to include something about Cuirass, but I don't > have a clear picture of it's scope or purpose, so I'm not really the > right person to attempt to write authoritatively about it. OK, fair enough, Matthieu,

Re: New blog post on the Guix Build Coordinator: Building derivations, how complicated can it be?

Vincent Legoll writes: > Hello, > > On Sat, Apr 24, 2021 at 8:28 AM Christopher Baines wrote: >> With some prompting, there's now a blog post about the Guix Build >> Coordinator > > Nice post that explains a lot, but I'm still not so sure about the > relations to cuirass. I'd have liked a

Re: New blog post on the Guix Build Coordinator: Building derivations, how complicated can it be?

Hello, On Sat, Apr 24, 2021 at 8:28 AM Christopher Baines wrote: > With some prompting, there's now a blog post about the Guix Build > Coordinator Nice post that explains a lot, but I'm still not so sure about the relations to cuirass. I'd have liked a small paragraph explaining what the

Re: wip blog post (v2): running Guix System on ARM

Le Sat, 23 Nov 2019 18:19:22 +0100, Ludovic Courtès a écrit : > Hello, > > Danny Milosavljevic skribis: > > > On Sun, 17 Nov 2019 17:57:28 +0100 > > Julien Lepiller wrote: > > > >> Thank you! attached is a new version of that blog post. I think > >> I'll convert it to texinfo and add it to

Re: wip blog post (v2): running Guix System on ARM

Hello, Danny Milosavljevic skribis: > On Sun, 17 Nov 2019 17:57:28 +0100 > Julien Lepiller wrote: > >> Thank you! attached is a new version of that blog post. I think I'll >> convert it to texinfo and add it to the cookbook, instead of making it >> a blog post, as we then could change or

Re: wip blog post (v2): running Guix System on ARM

Hi Julien, On Sun, 17 Nov 2019 17:57:28 +0100 Julien Lepiller wrote: > Thank you! attached is a new version of that blog post. I think I'll > convert it to texinfo and add it to the cookbook, instead of making it > a blog post, as we then could change or remove it more easily if we > make

Re: wip blog post: running Guix System on ARM

On Sun, Nov 17, 2019 at 08:43:33PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Hello! > > Julien Lepiller skribis: > > > Hi, attached is a draft for a blog post (or a section in the cookbook) > > for explaining how to install the Guix System on an ARM board. WDYT? > > I really like it! Yes, it makes we

Re: wip blog post: running Guix System on ARM

Hello! Julien Lepiller skribis: > Hi, attached is a draft for a blog post (or a section in the cookbook) > for explaining how to install the Guix System on an ARM board. WDYT? I really like it! Nitpick: s/grub/GRUB/ and s/u-?boot/U-Boot/ (when referring to the software). Perhaps a reference

Re: wip blog post: running Guix System on ARM

Hi, Pierre Neidhardt skribis: >> ### The kernel modules >> >> In order for Guix to be able to load the system from the initramfs, it will >> probably need > > Maybe define initramfs? Or just link to > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Initramfs. I’d suggest writing “initial RAM disk (initrd)”

Re: wip blog post: running Guix System on ARM

Hello, Danny Milosavljevic skribis: > On Wed, 13 Nov 2019 22:21:54 +0100 > Julien Lepiller wrote: > >> Hi, attached is a draft for a blog post (or a section in the cookbook) >> for explaining how to install the Guix System on an ARM board. WDYT? > > I guess it can't hurt to describe this stuff

Re: wip blog post (v2): running Guix System on ARM

Le Thu, 14 Nov 2019 13:12:11 +0100, Danny Milosavljevic a écrit : > Hi Julien, > > On Wed, 13 Nov 2019 22:21:54 +0100 > Julien Lepiller wrote: > > > Hi, attached is a draft for a blog post (or a section in the > > cookbook) for explaining how to install the Guix System on an ARM > > board.

Re: wip blog post: running Guix System on ARM

Le Thu, 14 Nov 2019 12:05:34 +0100, "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" a écrit : > On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 10:29:22AM +0100, Pierre Neidhardt wrote: > > Neat, thanks for this article! > > > > Yes, thank you! I have not tried yet though. > > Maybe add the top add instructions what to do if

Re: wip blog post: running Guix System on ARM

Hi Julien, On Wed, 13 Nov 2019 22:21:54 +0100 Julien Lepiller wrote: > Hi, attached is a draft for a blog post (or a section in the cookbook) > for explaining how to install the Guix System on an ARM board. WDYT? I guess it can't hurt to describe this stuff as it works now, but the goal is

Re: wip blog post: running Guix System on ARM

On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 10:29:22AM +0100, Pierre Neidhardt wrote: > Neat, thanks for this article! > Yes, thank you! I have not tried yet though. Maybe add the top add instructions what to do if installation fails (i.e. flash the SD with another operating system and start anew). > > Make

Re: wip blog post: running Guix System on ARM

Hi, Thank you for the article! I would find interesting to point somewhere in your post to these previous blog posts [1] [2] [3] about ARM and Guix. :-) [1] https://guix.gnu.org/blog/2017/porting-guixsd-to-armv7/ [2] http://guix.gnu.org/blog/2018/guix-on-android/ [3]

Re: wip blog post: running Guix System on ARM

Hi Julien, Julien Lepiller writes: > Hi, attached is a draft for a blog post (or a section in the cookbook) > for explaining how to install the Guix System on an ARM board. WDYT? LOL! \O/ This should be a cookbook section, and released soon unless other people find some error or important

Re: a blog post

Catonano writes: > I posted a brand new post in my little personal somewhat indie blog Thank you for sharing it! > I remember Ludo saying that not only new packages and services would > be needed for the future of Guix but also community oriented stuff > such as blog posts

Re: a blog post

2018-04-07 11:53 GMT+02:00 Hartmut Goebel : > Am 06.04.2018 um 10:58 schrieb Catonano: > > It's about Guix, Guile and Free Software in general. From my very own > > point of view > > Quote: > > [org.mode…] as far as I understand some Google employees worked on

Re: a blog post

On 2018-04-07 11:53, Hartmut Goebel wrote: Am 06.04.2018 um 10:58 schrieb Catonano: It's about Guix, Guile and Free Software in general. From my very own point of view Quote: [org.mode…] as far as I understand some Google employees worked on it. Does one become blessed and enlightened

Re: a blog post

Am 06.04.2018 um 10:58 schrieb Catonano: > It's about Guix, Guile and Free Software in general. From my very own > point of view Quote: [org.mode…] as far as I understand some Google employees worked on it. Does one become blessed and enlightened by getting employed by Gugle? Is Gugle a

Re: a blog post

Hello Catonano, Thanks for the blog post, I added your feed to my feed reader. I understand your frustration with autotools, it can be difficult to figure out how to get autotools to do what you want. The benefit of autotools is that it creates the same interface to build, test, and install GNU