On 3/20/24 19:22, Giovanni Biscuolo wrote:
Hello Ludovic and Guix devel community!
Disclaimer: I've still not read all the relevant threads [3] [4], so
please forgive me if I repeat some information already provided.
What rights are we talking about?
You are making the same misconception as
> We are talking about social rules that we have here in the Guix
> community not legal/state rules.
ethics, i.e. the discussion of rights, is a branch of philosophy.
ideally, it should inform the people who are writing and enforcing state laws,
but these days -- sadly -- it has precious
Hello pinoaffe,
pinoaffe writes:
[...]
> I think we, as Guix,
> - should examine if/how it is currently feasible to rewrite our git
> history,
it's not, see also:
https://guix.gnu.org/en/blog/2020/securing-updates/
> - should examine possible workarounds going forward,
> - should move
Hi,
What are you implying with the "loud" minority here?
MSavoritias
He's probably talking about the same thing that made you continue being
heated after the fact you were told to calm down and you are not wasting
any single opportunity to continue answering every single email in this
Hello all. I object to this argument:
MSavoritias writes:
> We are talking about social rules that we have here in the Guix
> community not legal/state rules.
No, legal rules come from deliberation of social arguments.
CoC-wise, it seems to me that SWH was unfriendly and this is important
to
Hi!
MSavoritias writes:
> On 3/20/24 19:22, Giovanni Biscuolo wrote:
>> Disclaimer: I've still not read all the relevant threads [3] [4], so
>> please forgive me if I repeat some information already provided.
>>
>> What rights are we talking about?
>
> You are making the same misconception as
Am 21.03.24 um 07:12 schrieb MSavoritias:
Specifically the social rules that we support trans people and we want
to include them. Any person really that want to change their name at
some point for some reason.
Interestingly you are asking the right to get the old name rewritten for
trans
On 3/21/24 17:23, Hartmut Goebel wrote:
Am 21.03.24 um 07:12 schrieb MSavoritias:
Specifically the social rules that we support trans people and we
want to include them. Any person really that want to change their
name at some point for some reason.
Interestingly you are asking the right
On 3/21/24 17:08, Giovanni Biscuolo wrote:
Hello pinoaffe,
pinoaffe writes:
[...]
I think we, as Guix,
- should examine if/how it is currently feasible to rewrite our git
history,
it's not, see also:
https://guix.gnu.org/en/blog/2020/securing-updates/
- should examine possible
On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 04:23:01PM +0100, Hartmut Goebel wrote:
> Am 21.03.24 um 07:12 schrieb MSavoritias:
> > Specifically the social rules that we support trans people and we want
> > to include them. Any person really that want to change their name at
> > some point for some reason.
>
>
Giovanni Biscuolo writes:
> [...]
> pinoaffe writes:
>> - should examine possible workarounds going forward,
>> - should move towards something like UUIDs and petnames in the long run.
>>
>> (see https://spritelyproject.org/news/petname-systems.html).
>
> I don't understand how using petnames,
Hartmut Goebel writes:
> Am 21.03.24 um 07:12 schrieb MSavoritias:
>> Specifically the social rules that we support trans people and we
>> want to include them. Any person really that want to change their
>> name at some point for some reason.
>
> Interestingly you are asking the right to get
Dear Guixers,
I'm a huge fan of guix --container, and I created a system to use those
by default for network services. But the VPS these services run on has
only 2GB of RAM, and I just realized that a container, by default,
requires at least 200MB.
Try it:
guix shell time which -- bash -c
On Thu, Mar 21, 2024, at 11:11 AM, MSavoritias wrote:
> On 3/21/24 17:08, Giovanni Biscuolo wrote:
>> […]
>> I don't understand how using petnames, uuids or even a re:claimID
>> identity (see below) could solve the problem with "rewriting history" in
>> case a person wishes to change his or her
> IMHO This is a quiet egocentric point of view.
> What are you implying with the "loud" minority here?
Hi,
"Quiet" is a funny typo here.
Also, "peace on Earth and goodwill toward [all]." [1]
Please
[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=74ocbvwam7c
15 matches
Mail list logo
