Re: Maintaining GNU Jami package for Guix

2019-11-03 Thread Jan
> are security fixes in nearly every new version. Thus, we can only > support the latest one. Okay, I'll try using the latest packages for Jami then. Jan Wielkiewicz

Re: Maintaining GNU Jami package for Guix

2019-11-03 Thread Jan
ans.c failed -- I would guess Jami needs a > different version of pjproject, or the patches are applied in the > wrong order? Already using the proper version of pjproject, so the order seems to be the problem, thanks a lot! I'll ask the developers about the order. Jan Wielkiewicz

Re: Maintaining GNU Jami package for Guix

2019-11-03 Thread Jan
arely causes problems (there is > 'make-file-writable' in case it does). I've tried it already, but it somehow doesn't work, check my previous mails. Seems I'm missing something important. Jan Wielkiewicz

Re: Packaging Jami progress

2019-11-11 Thread Jan
t; If you want to know how many packages depend on gnutls, you can run > > guix refresh -l gnutls Will use next time, thanks. I'm also installing Guix System on an external hard drive and I'll be able to compile everything with 6 cores (12 threads) on my second machine. > Cheers! > Jan Wielkiewicz

Re: Packaging Jami progress

2019-11-14 Thread Jan
ince I know almost nothing. - a small tutorial about maintaining a package, from the perspective of someone, who didn't know much about build systems and packaging. Things like where do you look for the needed dependencies, etc. Jan Wielkiewicz

Re: Packaging Jami progress

2019-11-14 Thread Jan
f I find something worth improving, I'll tell. > Regarding the dependencies, it belongs to upstream > to tell which deps Jami uses; sadly this is not done very well in > their current documentation. We could open an issue I suppose. I'll ask about this. > Cheers! > Jan Wielkiewicz

Re: Packaging Jami progress

2019-11-16 Thread Jan
til webkit-gtk substitute is available, because my laptop is underpowered. Jan Wielkiewicz

Re: Packaging Jami progress

2019-12-04 Thread Jan
m))), but it isn't. Using #:prefix doesn't seem to be a good way of handling this. Can I remove the unnecessary "which"? Sorry for asking so many questions, the whole thing is huge... Hope one day I'll be able to do everything myself. Jan Wielkiewicz

Re: Packaging Jami progress

2019-12-03 Thread Jan
s, etc. because the package seems to require it now. Anyway, building the latest Jami version works now. I'll send the patches in my free (as in freedom) time :) > Cheers! > Jan Wielkiewicz

Re: Packaging Jami progress

2019-12-11 Thread Jan
Okay, thanks. I'll use the second way then. I could also create a new file - jami-utils.scm and use it as a module, but a file containing only one procedure isn't good either. On Tue, 10 Dec 2019 18:43:58 -0600 Caleb Ristvedt wrote: > Jan Wielkiewicz writes: > > > I tri

Re: Packaging Jami progress

2019-12-05 Thread Jan
services out there, like sr.ht, maybe > gogs.io, etc. > This would make it smoother to track your progress and help you in > the process. I'll check this out, thanks. Jan Wielkiewicz

Maintaining GNU Jami package for Guix

2019-10-18 Thread Jan
systems. What are the things I need to learn to be able to start packaging? Jan Wielkiewicz

Re: Maintaining GNU Jami package for Guix

2019-10-19 Thread Jan
age I want to update) depends on a specific version of a library? Should I just update the package, or should I add a separate version of the library? Jan Wielkiewicz

Re: Packaging Jami progress

2019-11-26 Thread Jan
On Tue, 26 Nov 2019 11:07:28 +0100 Pierre Neidhardt wrote: > I was waiting for people to test the patch, since it does not run > properly on my machine (the UI does not show up). > > Have you tried it yourself, Jan? Does ti work for you? > That's the chicken and the egg proble

Re: Packaging Jami progress

2019-11-30 Thread Jan
On Wed, 27 Nov 2019 12:43:19 +0100 zimoun wrote: > Hi Jan, Hello, > If you use Emacs, you can open Debbugs with: C-u M-x debbugs-gnu then > RET guix-patches n y > Then M-x debbugs-gnu-bugs RET 38211 RET > So far so good. > Select the patch set. > Then M-x shell-command-o

Re: Packaging Jami progress

2019-12-01 Thread Jan
had patched ffmpeg: https://git.jami.net/savoirfairelinux/ring-project/issues/691#note_16723 The first should be easy, but the second probably requires adding ffmpeg-jami (if I'm correct). Jan Wielkiewicz

Re: Packaging Jami progress

2019-12-01 Thread Jan
/savoirfairelinux/ring-project/issues/691 Should I ask them to add the option for Guix on this page? https://jami.net/download-jami-linux/ I mean, do we consider the package to be more or less ready, so they can show it? Jan Wielkiewicz

Re: Packaging Jami progress

2019-11-25 Thread Jan
Hi again, Sorry for being impatient, but is it normal for patches to be merged that long? Is there something stopping the commits? I need those merged in order to continue working on Jami. Jan Wielkiewicz

Re: Joint statement on the GNU Project

2019-10-08 Thread Jan
io/ I don't really know what should I think about all of this, but it would be a bit unjust if Stallman didn't have any defense, even if he made a mistake. Hope I won't get excluded from the project, because of my opinion, Jan

Re: Plan for a release!

2020-03-05 Thread Jan
ows an error "Couldn't run /gnu/store/-exo-0.12.6/bin/exo-open --launch TerminalEmulator" It can't find the file/directory. Hope this helps. Jan Wielkiewicz

Install script supporting sysV init?

2020-01-26 Thread Jan
of bugs in our package, but I can't build packages such as webkit-gtk or Qt on my potato laptop. Jan Wielkiewicz

Re: Maintaining Jami #3

2020-01-27 Thread Jan
er - anything can be a problem, if the package has about 1GB of dependencies... Jan Wielkiewicz

Re: Install script supporting sysV init?

2020-01-28 Thread Jan
On Tue, 28 Jan 2020 23:58:47 +0100 Danny Milosavljevic wrote: > Hi Jan, > > thanks for testing it! > > > I'd start a new process, for example: > > cat & > > then note the process ID (on the right; if it's not shown, invoke > jobs -p). Ah, right, forgot i

Re: Install script supporting sysV init?

2020-01-27 Thread Jan
guix-daemon" to "/gnu/store/ncknl03pkmamrxg7q9nxi1rn1qhvwbi9-guix-1.0.1/bin/guix-daemon" and it worked, but it isn't the right solution I guess. What should I do? On Sun, 26 Jan 2020 23:38:20 +0100 Danny Milosavljevic wrote: > Hi Jan, > > > Does someone plan writing

Re: Install script supporting sysV init?

2020-01-28 Thread Jan
On Tue, 28 Jan 2020 15:52:34 +0100 Danny Milosavljevic wrote: > Hi Jan, > > cool! > > Could you try what happens in the corner cases: > > (1) Try to start it twice. The second start attempt should fail and > $? should reflect that First and second start works the

Re: Install script supporting sysV init?

2020-02-05 Thread Jan
s max 3GB RAM :) > -- > Joshua Branson > Sent from Emacs and Gnus Jan Wielkiewicz

Packaging pjproject

2020-01-31 Thread Jan
ld. How do we deal with problems like this? Jan Wielkiewicz

Re: Packaging pjproject

2020-01-31 Thread Jan
On Fri, 31 Jan 2020 17:05:28 +0100 Marius Bakke wrote: > > Unfortunately there is no single approach for dealing with these kinds > of problems, as they are typically highly package-specific. Do I have to learn GNU Make to be able to deal with it? > I must admit that I'm a lit

Re: Packaging pjproject

2020-02-02 Thread Jan
orst thing to maintain, didn't I :D I guess we can remove pjproject then and use only pjproject-jami, but that doesn't fix the bug. I'll try checking how is pjproject-jami different from what Jami devs build, but have no clue whatsoever. Jan Wielkiewicz

Re: Packaging pjproject

2020-02-02 Thread Jan
But it seems Gentoo has pjproject package, I can't read it though. I could try reading this, but it'll take some time for me to understand. https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/tree/net-libs/pjproject/pjproject-2.9-r1.ebuild Jan Wielkiewicz

Re: Maintaining Jami #3

2020-02-07 Thread Jan
On Fri, 07 Feb 2020 14:53:23 +0100 Pierre Neidhardt wrote: > This is great news, thanks for keeping up with the hard work! > > At this point, I think it's safe to say that Jami is still a > work-in-progress :p Yeah, it's always wip in my opinion :D > Jan, what do you think of m

Re: Maintaining Jami #3

2020-02-06 Thread Jan
, because they're a total mess. I guess I'll close the current issue and open a new one once I finish cleaning my code. I'll also finish learning git, as I have some free time now. Jan Wielkiewicz

Re: Maintaining Jami #3

2020-02-07 Thread Jan
087?format=diff=6087 I've been thinking about this. What's the procedure of applying patches in Guix? Should I use my procedure? How to copy the patch into the package source tree? Or should I use substitute*? Jan Wielkiewicz

Re: Maintaining Jami #3

2020-02-07 Thread Jan
pjproject (they fix lots of stuff there). I'll clean up my repo tomorrow and post changes. Jan Wielkiewicz

Re: Install script supporting sysV init?

2020-01-28 Thread Jan
On Mon, 27 Jan 2020 13:05:11 -0500 Julien Lepiller wrote: > I think you should set it > to /var/guix/profiles/per-user/root/current-guix/bin/guix-daemon (or > something similar). I think we already do that for systemd? Thanks, it works! One step further for Guix becoming the universa

Re: Install script supporting sysV init?

2020-01-30 Thread Jan
pied contents of one of these into another like this: restart) "$0" stop "$0" start ;; force-reload) "$0" stop "$0" start ;; Jan Wielkiewicz

Maintaining Jami #4

2020-02-17 Thread Jan
if the outdated glibc is a problem with one crash. When will be the 1.1.0 version of Guix released? The good news is pjproject 2.10 is out fixing many crashes. Anyone knows how to upload git repository with Guix to Gitlab? Jan Wielkiewicz

Re: Maintaining Jami #4

2020-02-17 Thread Jan
ate a wip-jami branch and commit your changes there. > - Whenever you want to update "master", simply "git fetch --all" then > rebase your wip-jami onto origin/master. > > Let me know if you want more details. > Nope, that'll do, did something similar already. Thanks! Jan Wielkiewicz

Maintaining Jami #3

2020-01-10 Thread Jan
for Jami. What am I missing? I need to try running it on a foreign distro to check if my hardware is not an issue, since Jami devs can't reproduce the issue I wrote about some mails ago. Jan Wielkiewicz

Re: Proposal for Outreachy (May-August 2020)

2020-01-11 Thread Jan
On Sun, 12 Jan 2020 00:39:55 +0100 Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Hi, > > > The “or any later version” wording is present in source file headers, > so it’s definitely ‘gpl2+’, not ‘gpl2’. Right, that's what I was supposed to say, but my brain removed the "+". > I

Re: Maintaining Jami #3

2020-01-18 Thread Jan
I'm really sorry for this spam, but the GSM we have packaged isn't the GSM I'm talking about, didn't notice this. Help me identifying the license please, sorry for the confusion. How should I name the package, if both have the same name? Jan Wielkiewicz

Re: Maintaining Jami #3

2020-01-18 Thread Jan
Nevermind, I somehow missed GSM is already packaged, sorry. Anyway, the second question is still relevant. Jan Wielkiewicz

Re: Maintaining Jami #3

2020-01-18 Thread Jan
Jutta Degener Carsten Bormann - I guess it's "license:non-copyleft", but I'm not sure. By the way, have someone checked my commits for Jami? My private repo starts getting more and more outdated, what makes it harder for me to continue working, because I'm not a git wizard

Re: Maintaining Jami #3

2020-01-19 Thread Jan
On Sun, 19 Jan 2020 10:20:51 +0100 Pierre Neidhardt wrote: > Hi Jan, > > I tested the Jami package we have in upstream Guix: > > - It fails to start on my desktop, it only works on my laptop. > > - The client kept disconnecting. I could send a few text messages >

Re: Maintaining Jami #3

2020-01-20 Thread Jan
I didn't really answer your questions earlier, sorry. On Sun, 19 Jan 2020 10:20:51 +0100 Pierre Neidhardt wrote: > Hi Jan, > > I tested the Jami package we have in upstream Guix: > > - It fails to start on my desktop, it only works on my laptop. What do you mean by desk

Re: Proposal for Outreachy (May-August 2020)

2020-01-09 Thread Jan
nse as published by > * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or > * (at your option) any later version. I guess the license is GPLV2 then, but I'm not sure, can someone confirm this? Jan Wielkiewicz

Re: Proposal for Outreachy (May-August 2020)

2020-01-08 Thread Jan
On Wed, 08 Jan 2020 07:06:26 + "Raghav Gururajan" wrote: > Hello Jan! > > Yeah, I am too disappointed by some or half of the things they > incorporated into the project. The thing is, I want to bring more > newcomers of GNU+Linux System into Guix. I would like to

Re: Proposal for Outreachy (May-August 2020)

2020-01-08 Thread Jan
On Wed, 8 Jan 2020 12:40:52 +0200 Efraim Flashner wrote: > > For better or worse Gnome is the dominant desktop in the GNU/Linux > market space and we do have it packaged and offer it as part of our > default desktop example. Furthermore Raghav has already been working > on maki

Re: Packaging Jami progress

2020-01-03 Thread Jan
On Fri, 03 Jan 2020 07:33:38 +0100 Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > That’s very unlikely as we would probably see errors like this in most > packages then. > > cogl issues an optimized instruction (__memcpy_ssse3), which then > fails. > > I’m just guessing, but I wonder if t

Re: Packaging Jami progress

2019-12-23 Thread Jan
ht lines? Should I add them? I also moved Jami and its modified dependencies to a new file - jami.scm. I know for sure that's Pierre's and my work, but I don't know if someone else have modified the code. Jan Wielkiewicz

Re: Packaging Jami progress

2020-01-01 Thread Jan
nable-pic" ... Bad news: I still haven't got any response that would solve the bug present only in our package: https://git.jami.net/savoirfairelinux/ring-client-gnome/issues/1123 I have not much experience with debugging and reading backtraces, but could it be there's something wrong w

Re: Packaging Jami progress

2019-12-24 Thread Jan
for security package - I don't want to make the whole community vulnerable due to a stupid mistake I could make. Jan Wielkiewicz

Re: Packaging Jami progress

2020-01-05 Thread Jan
think the tutorial for sending patches should be in a step-by-step form. Jan Wielkiewicz

Re: Packaging Jami progress

2020-01-06 Thread Jan
. Or should I send one mail to guix-patc...@gnu.org and then send the rest to n...@debbugs.gnu.org? Jan Wielkiewicz

Maintaining Jami #3

2020-01-07 Thread Jan
I sent the patches to the mailing list, hope this time it'll be threaded properly. Thanks everyone for suggestions! Jan Wielkiewicz

Re: Proposal for Outreachy (May-August 2020)

2020-01-07 Thread Jan
Hi! On Tue, 07 Jan 2020 11:32:10 + "Raghav Gururajan" wrote: > Hello Guix Folks! > > 1) Improve GNOME Software Stack and GNOME Desktop Environment's > user-experience in Guix. > In my opinion we should stay away from GNOME, because it is a Red Hat project, rathe

Re: Maintaining Jami #3

2020-01-07 Thread Jan
The issue is now available here https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/39005 Jan Wielkiewicz

Re: Packaging Jami progress

2019-12-28 Thread Jan
ery clear which is one is loaded > first. Hence my comment. > > The wrapper aims to fix this issue by prepending > sqlite-with-column-metadata to LD_LIBRARY_PATH, which has higher > priority than the RPATH. This makes sure the right library is loaded. > > Does that make more sense? > Yes, this is understandable. Jan Wielkiewicz

Re: Packaging Jami progress

2019-12-28 Thread Jan
assing only ".jami-gnome-real" which is a binary, to gdb, the needed path wasn't exported. > P.S.: Have you managed to set up a public Git clone of Guix to share > you patches? > Not yet, but can try today. Jan Wielkiewicz

Re: Thunar cannot launch gio-launch-desktop

2020-03-09 Thread Jan
Hello, it seems the issue is not Thunar-specific as Diego pointed out https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches/2020-03/msg00291.html I'm closing the issue then. Cool wrapper exercise though :) Jan Wielkiewicz

Re: Thunar cannot launch gio-launch-desktop

2020-03-06 Thread Jan
cken, but I can try tinkering with it. > -- > Ricardo Jan Wielkiewicz

Re: Thunar cannot launch gio-launch-desktop

2020-03-06 Thread Jan
uld be able to do this then. I guess there are many examples, so this should be easy. Just give me a day, because it's night here now. Jan Wielkiewicz

Re: Thunar cannot launch gio-launch-desktop

2020-03-08 Thread Jan
I sent the patch, the issue number is 39989. Jan Wielkiewicz

Re: Thunar cannot launch gio-launch-desktop

2020-03-08 Thread Jan
t; Yes, then we can discuss it. Thanks! > I used just "inputs" instead of "propagated-inputs" and it works as well. I guess I'll just send the patch now. Jan Wielkiewicz

Jami: Bug source investigation

2020-04-08 Thread Jan
cated in ring-project/make-ring.py and ring-project/scripts. The source packages are available here: https://dl.jami.net/release/tarballs/ And the binaries that don't suffer from the bug are here: https://dl.jami.net/nightly/ Jan Wielkiewicz

Re: Jami: Bug source investigation

2020-04-15 Thread Jan
ject to 2.10? Yes, of course. It seems all pjproject errors look like this :P Is there a way to use configure flags from rules.mak file provided by Jami? Currently I use "#:configure-flags" form, but I have to be sure I didn't miss anything important from the file. Jan Wielkiewicz

Re: Jami: Bug source investigation

2020-04-16 Thread Jan
On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 10:16:27 +0200 Pierre Neidhardt wrote: > Hi Jan, > > If I understand correctly, your updated package works better than the > one we've current got in Guix. Chat seems to work, sending recorded audio/video messages works, sending files works, audio/video calls wo

Re: Jami: Bug source investigation

2020-04-16 Thread Jan
Okay, the patches are there. It should be available soon https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/40677 Jan Wielkiewicz

Re: Packaging Jami "progress"

2020-04-07 Thread Jan
I get several merge conflicts when merging wip-jami into core updates. The wip-jami is based on the current master, rebased a minute ago. Is there a way to avoid this without pain? Jan Wielkiewicz

Re: Packaging Jami "progress"

2020-04-07 Thread Jan
ill remember about this cherry-pick thing, because resolving failing patches wasn't fun, thanks. If it succeeds, I will need a way to copy contents of the store on my powerful machine to my potato machine. Is "guix copy" the tool I can use? Jan Wielkiewicz

Re: Packaging Jami "progress"

2020-04-07 Thread Jan
Just tested Jami on core-updates and no magic happened, the bug is still there. I'm out of ideas. I'm going to upload my work somewhere tomorrow. Someone really needs to help me with this, I'm not experienced enough to handle this kind of bugs myself. Jan Wielkiewicz

Packaging Jami "progress"

2020-04-06 Thread Jan
tributions either). Jan Wielkiewicz

Re: Packaging Jami "progress"

2020-04-06 Thread Jan
some free time. > 1.1.0 will be released before the core-updates merge. I'll try with the current core-updates then. Jan Wielkiewicz

Re: Jami: Bug source investigation (help needed)

2020-04-13 Thread Jan
-and-other-things-for-guix As I said before, I'm out of ideas how to fix the problem. Jan Wielkiewicz

Re: Adding a %desktop-packages

2020-04-03 Thread Jan
to have any technical knowledge, by doing so it can gain wider audience and popularity. Jan Wielkiewicz

Re: Jami: Bug source investigation

2020-05-03 Thread Jan
On Sun, 03 May 2020 16:17:57 +0200 Pierre Neidhardt wrote: > Jan writes: > > > Placing a call works, disconnecting doesn't. > > Hmm, does not work for me. Have you tried non-locally, over a WAN? > Calls over WAN are always tricky, I had little luck with that even w

Re: Jami: Bug source investigation

2020-05-03 Thread Jan
On Sun, 03 May 2020 17:26:33 +0200 Pierre Neidhardt wrote: > Jan writes: > > > Calls over WAN are always tricky, I had little luck with that even > > with the official Jami binary packages. With some friends > > everything works 100%, with other nothing works. I

Re: Thunar cannot launch gio-launch-desktop

2020-03-07 Thread Jan
I managed to fix it by adding glib:bin to propagated inputs and wrapping by adding gio-launch-desktop to PATH. Is using PATH correct way of doing so? If yes, should I send the patch to the patch mailing list? Jan Wielkiewicz

Re: The problem of packaging Minetest mods/games

2020-05-20 Thread Jan
public package) This way installing minetest installs both the game's core and the default game. What do you think about this solution? Jan Wielkiewicz

Jami bug investigation #2

2020-05-20 Thread Jan
procedures applying patches). Is it possible that there's something wrong with permissions in the pjproject repository, which makes it impossible to apply the patches? I'm using the exact same pjproject version as Jami developers, yet patching fails. Any ideas? Jan Wielkiewicz

The problem of packaging Minetest mods/games

2020-05-19 Thread Jan
s in the ~/.minetest/games folder? Jan Wielkiewicz

Re: Jami bug investigation #2

2020-05-22 Thread Jan
ackage-and-other-things-for-guix.git and go to the "wip-jami-from-git" branch. Thanks for checking it. Jan Wielkiewicz

Re: Jami bug investigation #2

2020-05-22 Thread Jan
this day - the change allowing Jami to be built from git is 5 fat commits already. Jan Wielkiewicz

Re: Jami: Bug source investigation

2020-05-03 Thread Jan
On Sun, 03 May 2020 09:54:34 +0200 Pierre Neidhardt wrote: > I see the new Jami got merged yesterday, thanks a lot for your work, > Jan and Mathieu! > > I just tested it with another client on macOS: > > - I can chat, althought it's very slow and some messages don't arr

Re: Jami bug investigation #2

2020-05-25 Thread Jan
Okay, so I fixed the patching problem using "--ignore-whitespace". Jan Wielkiewicz

Updating minetest to 5.6.0?

2022-09-15 Thread Jan
n from now on :) Jan Wielkiewicz

Re: Updating minetest to 5.6.0?

2022-09-15 Thread Jan
s of various mods, testing things > out. >> Should I also update games and mods? > If you want to, but I would say it's only required if otherwise the > mods > fail to load or are otherwise broken by the update. > Greetings, > Maxime. Jan WielkiewiczTemat: Re: Updating

Re: Some newbie questions

2015-10-29 Thread Jan Synáček
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 2:23 PM, Thompson, David <dthomps...@worcester.edu> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 6:08 AM, Jan Synáček <jan.syna...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I've been playing with guix a bit and I must say I really like it. I > d

Re: Reproducible builds: a means to an end

2015-11-12 Thread Jan Synáček
/forum.php?forum_id=8407 > > Feedback welcome! > > Ludo’. > The talk mentioned in that post was great! -- Jan Synáček

Test failure when building libarchive-3.1.2

2015-11-13 Thread Jan Synáček
ls. I'm running guix on Fedora 23. -- Jan Synáček

Re: Test failure when building libarchive-3.1.2

2015-11-14 Thread Jan Synáček
On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Ludovic Courtès <l...@gnu.org> wrote: > Jan Synáček <jan.syna...@gmail.com> skribis: > >> Reference files will be read from: >> /tmp/nix-build-libarchive-3.1.2.drv-0/libarchive-3.1.2/tar/test >> Running tests on: >&

Re: Lint on line

2015-12-01 Thread Jan Synáček
> package has an anchor in issues.html.) > > Do you think that would make sense? Or maybe one extra button and a tiny piece of javascript to show/hide the no-issue packages? -- Jan Synáček

Re: Test failure when building libarchive-3.1.2

2015-11-20 Thread Jan Synáček
On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Ludovic Courtès <l...@gnu.org> wrote: > Jan Synáček <jan.syna...@gmail.com> skribis: > >> Reference files will be read from: >> /tmp/nix-build-libarchive-3.1.2.drv-0/libarchive-3.1.2/tar/test >> Running tests on: >&

Re: Test failure when building libarchive-3.1.2

2015-11-20 Thread Jan Synáček
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Jan Synáček <jan.syna...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Ludovic Courtès <l...@gnu.org> wrote: >> Jan Synáček <jan.syna...@gmail.com> skribis: >> >>> Reference files will be read from: >>> /tm

Re: guix refresh -l

2015-11-21 Thread Jan Synáček
utes, but didn't realize that libarchive actually had so many dependent packages when I was building it:) Anyway, the new version looks great! Cheers, -- Jan Synáček

Re: Test failure when building libarchive-3.1.2

2015-11-20 Thread Jan Synáček
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 11:47 PM, Ludovic Courtès <l...@gnu.org> wrote: > Jan Synáček <jan.syna...@gmail.com> skribis: > >> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Ludovic Courtès <l...@gnu.org> wrote: >>> Jan Synáček <jan.syna...@gmail.com> skribis: >&

Re: rfh: mingw guile.exe stalled by impact of 28dc10a4

2016-06-05 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
ould/should not be the result of this commit? > Are you sure that reverting this commit solves the problem? Yes, reverting it produces the cross-built readline. > Maybe we’re entering a cross-build context with ‘%current-target-system’ > set to ‘x86_64-linux-gnu’ at some point? Yes, I'm pretty sur

Re: gnome-tweak-tool tweaks

2016-06-12 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
gnome-desktop were needed, which I also don't know what to do with yet. Greetings, Jan -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <jann...@gnu.org> | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.nl

Re: rfh: mingw guile.exe stalled by impact of 28dc10a4

2016-06-11 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes: Hi! Some more info, still no full picture. TL;DR: 28dc10a4 breaks the cross build on master (i.e. reverting it fixes the cross build), but core-updates has 28dc10a4 and there the cross build works. So cross building with 28dc10a4 depends on something else

gnome-tweak-tool tweaks

2016-06-06 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
it as a fix yet because gnome-tweak-tool does not list any themes, as davexunit reported. I'm attaching the log that I get when building it, there's a warning about xml files not being written and collisions, could that be the cause of missing themes? Greetings, Jan diff --git a/gnu/packages

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >