ip.c already works on OpenBSD, it's just missing some headers:
diff --git a/components/ip.c b/components/ip.c
index 686344b..422b448 100644
--- a/components/ip.c
+++ b/components/ip.c
@@ -1,5 +1,9 @@
/* See LICENSE file for copyright and license details. */
-#if defined(__linux__)
+#if
On 2016-10-29 21:35, Laslo Hunhold wrote:
The "problem" with dmenu is that it takes "long" flags, and given so
many scripts depend on it we just cannot change it that easily.
when did I suggest using arg.h for dmenu?
---
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\ www.asciiribbon.org
On 2016-10-29 12:40, Hiltjo Posthuma wrote:
This is total bullshit: it is less readable and it makes no sense to
optimize this case. Please fix real bugs.
uhm, like the dmenu one?[0]
[0]: http://git.suckless.org/dmenu/tree/dmenu.c#n649
---
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\
On 2016-10-28 23:56, Klemens Nanni wrote:
arg.h is really ugly code and way to complex for tools like slock that
have such minimal synopsis.
it's not ugly, you just can't wrap your head around it, it's just a unix
port of the plan 9 option parser[0]
[0]:
On 2016-10-28 13:21, Quentin Rameau wrote:
On 2016-10-28 13:02, Quentin Rameau wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 12:45:14PM +0000, Ali H. Fardan wrote:
>> actually, imo, I think
>> usage() should return success.
> Surely not.
> The call to usage() is made when wrong opt
On 2016-10-28 13:02, Quentin Rameau wrote:
On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 12:45:14PM +, Ali H. Fardan wrote:
actually, imo, I think
usage() should return success.
Surely not.
The call to usage() is made when wrong options have been passed to the
tool, you wouldn't return “no error” code when
I don't think -v should output to stderr either, actually, imo, I think
usage() should return success.
On 2016-10-28 12:40, Klemens Nanni wrote:
Returning -1 upon a valid invocation like 'dwm -v' is just wrong.
---
dwm.c | 6 --
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git
On 2016-10-27 11:54, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
Doesn't sound useful to me. Wallpaper fetishists should keep using OSX.
-Anselm
A wallpaper can help change your mood.
---
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments
O.o, whhops, that was the wrong patch, attached is the correct one.
sorry for spamming the list.diff --git a/ed.c b/ed.c
index 184ed30..feeab43 100644
--- a/ed.c
+++ b/ed.c
@@ -316,7 +316,7 @@ inject(char *s)
}
static void
-clearbuf()
+clearbuf(void)
{
if (scratch)
close(scratch);
@@
Uhm, sorry about that, but my last patch violates the default ed
behavior
by using eprintf(), here is the corrected version:
diff --git a/ed.c b/ed.c
index 184ed30..1e834a6 100644
--- a/ed.c
+++ b/ed.c
@@ -316,7 +316,7 @@ inject(char *s)
}
static void
-clearbuf()
+clearbuf(void)
{
diff --git a/ed.c b/ed.c
index 184ed30..c7648eb 100644
--- a/ed.c
+++ b/ed.c
@@ -316,7 +316,7 @@ inject(char *s)
}
static void
-clearbuf()
+clearbuf(void)
{
if (scratch)
close(scratch);
@@ -328,7 +328,7 @@ clearbuf()
}
static void
-setscratch()
+setscratch(void)
PS: I think this is where the code originated:
https://github.com/chjj/slock
I suggest you take a look at this:
https://notabug.org/kl3/slock
it was used to be called "slock for the absolute paranoid", but this
dude
wanted to go further with it and make it fit his taste, but there are
some security stuff he did there, check it out.
--
Raiz
On 2016-09-28 21:33, FRIGN
eprint() is not declared in ii, be careful.
Raiz
diff --git a/ii.c b/ii.c
index a32326d..51318aa 100644
--- a/ii.c
+++ b/ii.c
@@ -493,7 +493,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
#ifdef __OpenBSD__ /* OpenBSD pledge(2) support */
if (pledge("stdio rpath wpath
On 2016-09-05 10:39, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
Why should I try. This is blatantly obvious wrong code.
and that's my point.
I got an example:
try compiling this code:
#include
int
main(void)
{
printf("%d", sizeof unsigned char);
return (0);
}
you will probably get a compiler error like this:
sizeof.c: In function ‘main’:
sizeof.c:6:22: error: expected expression before ‘unsigned’
printf("%d",
On 2016-09-05 08:53, Markus Teich wrote:
can you elaborate on the reasoning behind this? The styleguide says
"Always use
() with sizeof".
from my experience, using sizeof without parenthesies could cause
errors.
Raiz
Sorry, I can't quote your last message because I accidently deleted
it. anyways, as far as I know __OpenBSD__ is either defined by the
compiler
(in openbsd) or the openbsd libc, so if the code being compiled under
openbsd
__OpenBSD__ will be defined.
Raiz
Would be helpful if you provided error string for pledge(), I have
also provided a pledge patch for sic and I submitted it a while ago
to the mailing list (maybe you did not notice it).
Raiz
diff --git a/sic.c b/sic.c
index ce6d216..6e37c60 100644
--- a/sic.c
+++ b/sic.c
@@ -182,6 +182,10 @@
sorry, wrong patch
On 2016-09-02 17:21, Ali H. Fardan wrote:
diff --git a/quark.c b/quark.c
index 6ff50f5..f69ed59 100644
--- a/quark.cdiff --git a/quark.c b/quark.c
index 6ff50f5..7e6530f 100644
--- a/quark.c
+++ b/quark.c
@@ -694,7 +694,7 @@ main(int argc, char *argv[])
/* raise
diff --git a/quark.c b/quark.c
index 6ff50f5..f69ed59 100644
--- a/quark.c
+++ b/quark.c
@@ -686,7 +686,7 @@ main(int argc, char *argv[])
/* reap children automatically */
if (signal(SIGCHLD, SIG_IGN) == SIG_ERR) {
- fprintf(stderr, "%s: signal: Failed to set
.
On 2016-09-01 20:13, Ali H. Fardan wrote:
from a security prespective, touch should not allow
everyone to have write permissions to the file, if
someones needs such a permission, chmod(1) can be
used later.
I have tried touch(1) from coreutils and OpenBSD,
both set the default permissions to 644
from a security prespective, touch should not allow
everyone to have write permissions to the file, if
someones needs such a permission, chmod(1) can be
used later.
I have tried touch(1) from coreutils and OpenBSD,
both set the default permissions to 644.
Raiz
diff --git a/touch.c b/touch.c
Right, I just found out that this is correct after
going through other programs
Raiz
On 2016-09-01 19:08, FRIGN wrote:
On Thu, 01 Sep 2016 19:01:50 +0300
"Ali H. Fardan" <r...@firemail.cc> wrote:
Hey Ali,
so I just came across this if (argc) statement and
I'm not sure
so I just came across this if (argc) statement and
I'm not sure why it is placed there in the first
pleace, I am assuming that argc is not tinkered with
(via arg.h), but the program works well without it,
so my question is, is this if() statement incorrect
or it's just there because of arg.h?
Greetings, This patch adds -u and -r options to sic, which allows the
user
to change the default ident and/or realname, is it good or garbage?
should
this go mainstream or just optional?
Raiz
diff --git a/sic.1 b/sic.1
index aba8db8..b85390a 100644
--- a/sic.1
+++ b/sic.1
@@ -9,6 +9,10 @@
26 matches
Mail list logo
