Re: [hackers] Deanster run at DFA
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 12:50:34PM -0700, Joshua Koenig wrote: > > Except that if you run the auth, then all sites have to be approved and > > vetted... or have I managed to completely misunderstand this whole > > thread, > > Zack? > > Well, it's debatable what it means. From my perspective it would just > be independent sites -- could be any site online -- deciding they can > trust DFA for login data. I'll go with whatever Howard's wonks want to > do. It's not a critical piece. Apparently I *did* misunderstand Zack; I thought he was asserting that that was the case. Rough time with English this month, I guess... :-} Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth[EMAIL PROTECTED] Member of the Technical Staff Baylink RFC 2100 The Suncoast Freenet The Things I Think Tampa Bay, Floridahttp://baylink.pitas.com +1 727 647 1274 OS X: Because making Unix user-friendly was easier than debugging Windows -- Simon Slavin, on a.f.c
Re: [hackers] Deanster run at DFA
Just catching the tail end of this, but we're fully planning to run deanster, I've got the server space planned, and I'm looking to hire for someone to administer. So all we're doing is making sure its designed in a way we can manage. There's a lot of projects we're going to build on this, and it runs off our main database (we'll be sending out email asking folks to register additional info to fill out deanster profile). This is one that we're completely committed to -- and it would be silly to set up rival deansters off site! Except that if you run the auth, then all sites have to be approved and vetted... or have I managed to completely misunderstand this whole thread, Zack? Well, it's debatable what it means. From my perspective it would just be independent sites -- could be any site online -- deciding they can trust DFA for login data. I'll go with whatever Howard's wonks want to do. It's not a critical piece. -j
Re: [hackers] Deanster run at DFA
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 01:44:44PM -0400, Zephyr Teachout wrote: > Just catching the tail end of this, but we're fully planning to run > deanster, I've got the server space planned, and I'm looking to hire for > someone to administer. So all we're doing is making sure its designed in > a way we can manage. There's a lot of projects we're going to build on > this, and it runs off our main database (we'll be sending out email > asking folks to register additional info to fill out deanster profile). > This is one that we're completely committed to -- and it would be silly > to set up rival deansters off site! Except that if you run the auth, then all sites have to be approved and vetted... or have I managed to completely misunderstand this whole thread, Zack? Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth[EMAIL PROTECTED] Member of the Technical Staff Baylink RFC 2100 The Suncoast Freenet The Things I Think Tampa Bay, Floridahttp://baylink.pitas.com +1 727 647 1274 OS X: Because making Unix user-friendly was easier than debugging Windows -- Simon Slavin, on a.f.c
