On Sunday 23 Jan 2011 23:06:40 Nadav Har'El wrote:
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011, Eli Billauer wrote about [Haifux] No! No! Don't
compile your kernel!:
Yet another sign that Linux is turning into a don't-touch-me kind of
system. How many times did they tell me I don't really want to compile
my
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011, Shlomi Fish wrote about Re: No! No! Don't compile your
kernel!:
built seemed snappier than the shipped-in Mandriva kernel, and it Freecell
Solver executed there at 72.7685720920563s instead of 73.6936609745026s (the
I hope that you agree with me that 99.9218485921% of
Just a couple of nitpicks, in the hope they will prove useful.
On 24/01/11 09:02, Shachar Raindel wrote:
dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot
At least on debian, -rfakeroot is assumed unless you want something
else (sudo, plugfakeroot-ng/plug or whatever).
And if I skip the tinker stage, build is
On Monday 24 Jan 2011 12:55:04 Nadav Har'El wrote:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011, Shlomi Fish wrote about Re: No! No! Don't compile
your kernel!:
built seemed snappier than the shipped-in Mandriva kernel, and it
Freecell Solver executed there at 72.7685720920563s instead of
73.6936609745026s (the
Hi,
To put it short: I never was much into the ideals of freedom. My
preference of free software always was because I could alter it to meet
my own needs. It was easy enough to do for real. And I had this feeling
that the system was meant to be hacked. It belonged to me. And that's
fading
On Monday, 24 בJanuary 2011 22:11:49 Eli Billauer wrote:
... It was easy enough to do for real. And I had this feeling
that the system was meant to be hacked. It belonged to me. And that's
fading away, most likely because nobody really seems to care about this.
Linux is becoming a piece of
complicated and contains much more
packages and much more lines of code.
--guy
Original message
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 23:12:48 +0200
From: Oron Peled o...@actcom.co.il
Subject: Re: [Haifux] No! No! Don't compile your kernel!
To: haifux@haifux.org
Cc: Shachar Raindel shach
Yet another sign that Linux is turning into a don't-touch-me kind of
system. How many times did they tell me I don't really want to compile
my kernel?
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Custom_Kernel
--
Web: http://www.billauer.co.il
___
Haifux mailing
Not because you can't.
Because for the enterprise market, where Centos is aimed at, *supportability
* is more important than 1.2% additional performance, or a certain new
experimental feature.
For your own home/development box, do whatever you want. For Enterprise?
Hell, no.
Ez
On Sun, Jan 23,
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011, Eli Billauer wrote about [Haifux] No! No! Don't compile
your kernel!:
Yet another sign that Linux is turning into a don't-touch-me kind of
system. How many times did they tell me I don't really want to compile
my kernel?
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Custom_Kernel
Nadav Har'El wrote:
When was the last time you compiled gcc on your own? When was the last time
you compiled the X Window System? For me, the answers to both questions is
1995. If you answered similarly (or even, never), why should the kernel be
any different - i.e., why do you need to compile
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 12:54 AM, Eli Billauer e...@billauer.co.il wrote:
In my case, I've had two reasons lately: One was because I wanted new
hardware to be supported on an outdated distribution, and the second was
because I wanted the kernel to support root on NFS without an initrd.
I
12 matches
Mail list logo
