Do you have an example of what purpose it would serve ? I'm asking
because it's not very easy to implement with table-based algorithms,
since the size of the table is determined by the GCD of all active
servers' weights. Thus adding a new server will change the size of
the table.
It's also
Hi all, i had a question on setting up haproxy in SSL, since my current site is
https(where i had used openssl to generate csr and crt keys), so i wanted to
load balance with the same.
My web servers are apache and they are behind the haproxy server, so once i
install stunnel on HAproxy
Hi,
On 7 February 2011 17:54, Amol mandm_z...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi all, i had a question on setting up haproxy in SSL, since my current site
is https(where i had used openssl to generate csr and crt keys), so i wanted
to load balance with the same.
My web servers are apache and they are
Hello,
The last stunnel patch I saw on this mailing list was for stunnel 4.34
available from this thread:
http://www.mail-archive.com/haproxy@formilux.org/msg04024.html
Someone worked on this today, too:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353955
It fixes the manpage, too. No one
Hi,
The X-Forwarded-For header is only added once at the end of all
processing.
Otherwise, having it in the defaults section would result in both your
frontend and your backend adding it.
Then the possibility to add it only to a frontend or a backend in the
defaults section would be nice?
So
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 09:45:21AM +0100, Bedis 9 wrote:
Do you have an example of what purpose it would serve ? I'm asking
because it's not very easy to implement with table-based algorithms,
since the size of the table is determined by the GCD of all active
servers' weights. Thus adding
On 2/7/11 1:01 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 09:45:21AM +0100, Bedis 9 wrote:
Do you have an example of what purpose it would serve ? I'm asking
because it's not very easy to implement with table-based algorithms,
since the size of the table is determined by the GCD of all
I notice that the documentation states that nbproc By default, only one
process is created, which is the recommended mode of operation.. I'm curios
why this is recommended, other than for debugging purposes.
Hi Joel,
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 01:10:53PM -0800, Joel Krauska wrote:
On 2/7/11 1:01 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 09:45:21AM +0100, Bedis 9 wrote:
Do you have an example of what purpose it would serve ? I'm asking
because it's not very easy to implement with table-based
Because a single process can handle several gigabits of traffic, and
there are issues with multiple processes. This isn't the first time this
question has been asked, here's a relevant discussion:
http://www.mail-archive.com/haproxy@formilux.org/msg01246.html
-JohnF
On 11-02-07 04:59 PM,
This looks great, thank you very much!
(apologies for the repeat question)
On Feb 7, 2011, at 5:57 PM, John Marrett wrote:
Because a single process can handle several gigabits of traffic, and there
are issues with multiple processes. This isn't the first time this question
has been asked,
Hi Craig, I will try and install this patch on my stunnel, but what would be
the installation steps? is it similar to sudo patch -p1
../stunnel-4.35-xforwarded-for.diff
and do i have to run the ./configure and make and make install again?
i have downloaded the patch from
12 matches
Mail list logo
