Hi,
As some might have noticed, HAProxy development is progressively slowing
down over time. I have analyzed the situation and came to the following
conclusions :
- the code base is increasing and is becoming slower to build day
after day. Ten years ago, version 1.1.31 was only 6716 lines
I bought the whole thing ... until I realized the date ...
(and I'm older than you Willy ;-) )
You should've gone turbopascal on me :-D
Franky
On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 10:43:47AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
In the end, of the current HAProxy will only remain the Lua engine, and
probably by then we'll find even better ones so that haproxy will be
distributed as a Lua library to use anywhere, maybe even on IoT devices
if that makes
On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 11:00:10AM +0200, Franky Van Liedekerke wrote:
I bought the whole thing ... until I realized the date ...
(and I'm older than you Willy ;-) )
You should've gone turbopascal on me :-D
I loved it as well, it was easy to write clean and efficient code.
Cheers,
Willy
Great one :)
I was 10 seconds away from forwarding this to our web teams :)
On 01/04/2015 09:43, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Hi,
As some might have noticed, HAProxy development is progressively slowing
down over time. I have analyzed the situation and came to the following
conclusions :
- the
I'd prefer a complete rewrite of HAProxy in JavaScript. We would be able to
make it run on all platform (hello windows), and with a simple browser tab
left open :(
2015-04-01 11:40 GMT+02:00 Chris Allen ch...@cjx.com:
Great one :)
I was 10 seconds away from forwarding this to our web teams :)
Good luck!
(good to hear about this progress)
2015-04-01 10:43 GMT+02:00 Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu:
Hi,
As some might have noticed, HAProxy development is progressively slowing
down over time. I have analyzed the situation and came to the following
conclusions :
- the code base is
Hi Willy,
On 1 April 2015 at 09:43, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu wrote:
Recently with the Lua addition, we found it to be quite fast. Maybe not
as fast as C, but Lua is improving and C skills are diminishing, so I
guess that in a few years the code written in Lua will be much faster
than the
On 1 Apr 2015, at 09:43, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu wrote:
we'll train the sales people
to write Lua as well in order to speed up development.
You got me going good until I read this. :-) Nice one Willy.
Pedro.
Ok. My immediate thought was..
Oh crap we are going to have to fork haproxy and hire loads of C developers!
Then when someone mentioned what day it was I felt incredible relief :-).
Nice joke. Well executed.
On 1 Apr 2015 10:06, Baptiste bed...@gmail.com wrote:
I'll have to find a way to code
I'll have to find a way to code buffer overflows in LUA!
Baptiste
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 10:43:51AM +0530, Krishna Kumar Unnikrishnan
(Engineering) wrote:
Hi all,
I am testing haproxy as follows:
System1: 24 Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2697 v3 @ 2.60GHz, 64 GB. This system
is running 3.19.0 kernel, and hosts the following servers:
1.
Dear community,
Is it possible to let the backend start a new https-session on with the CONNECT
method?
We’d like to get this setup in production. But unfortunately the proxy remote
issue is the only thing that stand in our way.
Any help is welcome.
Abdelouahed
Op 31 mrt. 2015, om 15:22
--
Bc. Josef Karliak
Správa sítě a elektronické pošty
Fakultní nemocnice Hradec Králové
Odbor výpočetních systémů
Sokolská 581, 500 05 Hradec Králové
Tel.: +420 495 833 931, Mob.: +420 724 235 654
e-mail: josef.karl...@fnhk.cz, http://www.fnhk.cz
[http://www.intesys.it/firme/logo_inetworking.jpg]
Claudio Ruggieri | System Specialist
Intesys Networking - Via Roveggia 122 A - 37136 Verona
Tel. 045 8205513 | Fax 045 503604
claudio.ruggi...@inetworking.it
www.inetworking.ithttp://www.inetworking.it
[Great Place to
Hi all,
I have a problem with agent-check, in my haproxy installation.
Ubuntu Server 14.04 LTS with haproxy 1.5.3-1~ubuntu14.04.1
HAProxy is configured with 2 backends: one http e one https.
Agent-check is a script bash that simply return a percentage.
HTTP backend works fine. HTTPS backend
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 4:13 PM, Claudio Ruggieri
claudio.ruggi...@inetworking.it wrote:
Hi all,
I have a problem with agent-check, in my haproxy installation.
Ubuntu Server 14.04 LTS with haproxy 1.5.3-1~ubuntu14.04.1
HAProxy is configured with 2 backends: one http e one https.
Claudio,
I just tested this on HAProxy 1.6 Dev0 and the bug is fixed (along
with several others)...
It was spotted by someone a few months ago that an SSL re-encrypted
real server would force agent checks to https (incorrectly)
On 1 April 2015 at 16:21, Claudio Ruggieri
I check with tcpdump: it seems that agent-check in the https backend try to do
a SSL connection.
My agent is a simple TCP socket without SSL.
However I managed to open an SSL socket, but I still have errors:
E SSL_accept(): error:140890C7:SSL routines:SSL3_GET_CLIENT_CERTIFICATE:peer
did not
Hello,
For some background we've been running a fork with this patch in production
and it seems to be pretty stable (no issues so far). I've been testing it
in our dev/staging environments by using iptables to kill machines and
this change does appear to bring down the latency hit for the
Hi all,
Le 01/04/2015 18:09, Malcolm Turnbull a écrit :
Claudio,
I just tested this on HAProxy 1.6 Dev0 and the bug is fixed (along
with several others)...
It was spotted by someone a few months ago that an SSL re-encrypted
real server would force agent checks to https (incorrectly)
Yes
21 matches
Mail list logo
