Hello,
In the June our company recommend you SMD3528 and SMD5050 serires with super quality bright chips
Big Promotion price as below :
1) 8MM-30 LED SMD3528 IP20--0.90USD/M
2) 8MM-60 LED SMD3528
Dear Sir/ Madam,
I am a PhD student in Pune, India. I am working on Dynamic Algorithms for
High-Availability CloudServer Load Balancing in Linux Environment for QoS. I am
very new to this concepts and technology.
As I was reading
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 10:13 AM, Vinod Kishan Lalbeg
vklal...@yahoo.com wrote:
Dear Sir/ Madam,
I am a PhD student in Pune, India. I am working on Dynamic Algorithms for
High-Availability Cloud Server Load Balancing in Linux Environment for QoS.
I am very new to this concepts and technology.
Hello,
Great ! I was actually speaking about it this morning at work ! Would love
to see this feature integrated (can it be backported to 1.5 too ?)
2015-06-23 20:07 GMT+02:00 Dave Zhu (yanbzhu) yanb...@cisco.com:
Hello all,
I have a proposed enhancement that I have coded up and would like
On 6/24/2015 1:23 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Thus my first goal with HTTP/2 in haproxy really is to make it a
solid H2-H1 gateway in order to provide a seamless migration to H2
to everyone, just like haproxy was massively used to provide IPv6
connectivity for the last IPv6 day.
I'll still
PromotionalGopro,nb=sp;Xiaomi,SJCAM ActioncameraAccessoriesasfollows:
MonopodPrice:usd1/pcs8stepFlexClipPrice:usd6.5/pcsGopro4DoublechargerwithC=ablePrice:usd2.28/setGopro4Battery1200mah
Hi Vinod,
First, good luck in your PhD.
For load-balancing algorithm, you want to read this part of the doc:
http://cbonte.github.io/haproxy-dconv/snapshot/configuration-1.6.html#balance
about the source code, it's available here:
http://git.haproxy.org/?p=haproxy.git
Also checkout
Oh great ! I was not aware that this list was also a nest for personal
attacks.
Thank you.
Le 24/06/2015 16:03, Willy Tarreau a écrit :
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 02:40:51PM +0200, Hoggins! wrote:
Ha ha ! We could also imagine an anti-sarcasm filter.
Not needed.
Anyway, that still does not
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 24, Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 06:07:43PM +, Dave Zhu (yanbzhu) wrote:
Hello all,
I have a proposed enhancement that I have coded up and would like your
comments.
The idea behind this is that when HAProxy is used to terminate SSL, and is
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 02:40:51PM +0200, Hoggins! wrote:
Ha ha ! We could also imagine an anti-sarcasm filter.
Not needed.
Anyway, that still does not explain why such discussions on spam
problems do not occur on other mailman MLs.
Maybe you've been living under a rock for the last 20
Hello Dave,
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 06:07:43PM +, Dave Zhu (yanbzhu) wrote:
Hello all,
I have a proposed enhancement that I have coded up and would like your
comments.
The idea behind this is that when HAProxy is used to terminate SSL, and is
configured with multiple
Currently, I?ve coded it so that this only happens when the client does not
specify an SNI, but I?m looking for guidance on what you would consider to be
the best solution. This approach can certainly be taken to be compatible with
SNI.
Is this something that you would be interested in
hi all,
Sorry for not answering sooner, but you know, you say I'll do it in a
couple of minute, then you focus on something else, then you forget,
then you say I'll do it in a couple of minute, then :)
First of all, such type of article takes a long time to write, to
review, to fix, to
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 11:33 PM, Shawn Heisey hapr...@elyograg.org
wrote:
I agree - the blog talks of handling multiple attacks individually, but
what we are
trying to understand is - how can we handle multiple types of attacks in a
single
configuration. Not the exact configuration file, but
Dear
Sir/Madam,Hello,thisj=olinafromCHZLightingTechnologyCo.,Ltd.,ourcompanyisa=professionalled
down lightmanufacturerwithyearsexperien=ce.Ourled down
lightareCE/ROHSlisted,warmlywelcomedb=ylotsofNorthAmericanclients.Sowewanttakeourselvesofopportu=nity
toestablishingbusinessrelationwithyou.
On 6/18/2015 4:32 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
On 6/17/2015 9:29 PM, Krishna Kumar (Engineering) wrote:
Referring to Baptiste's excellent blog on Use a lb as a first row of
defense
against DDoS @
http://blog.haproxy.com/2012/02/27/use-a-load-balancer-as-a-first-row-of-defense-against-ddos/
I am
Hello,
In the June our company recommend you SMD3528 and SMD5050 serires with super quality bright chips
Big Promotion price as below :
1) 8MM-30 LED SMD3528 IP20--0.90USD/M
2) 8MM-60 LED SMD3528
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 05:43:46PM +0100, Kobus Bensch wrote:
I don't get any. None. Nada. Zilch.
We actually *do* forward a bit of spam which is not caught by
the filter, but nothing people can't cope with, and quite often
the last-mile anti-spam can easily catch them while letting the
Hey Willy,
Lukas explained it pretty well, but I can expound on it some more.
You can imagine a situation where HAProxy has 2 certificates of different
key types; one ECDSA and one RSA. In the current codebase, if no SNI is
used, the certificate that is used will be whichever certificate is
Someone posted a link to a really tricked out anti-ddos haproxy config not
long ago, it might be interesting to you:
https://github.com/analytically/haproxy-ddos
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 11:51 AM, Shawn Heisey hapr...@elyograg.org wrote:
On 6/18/2015 4:32 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
On 6/17/2015
When http/2 support lands in haproxy, will http/2 support also be
required on the back end to take advantage of it?
I'm hoping that I can leverage http/2 without immediate support on the
back end. I would expect that the LAN connection between haproxy and
the back end servers will be fast enough
Hey Willy,
Lukas explained it pretty well, but I can expound on it some more.
You can imagine a situation where HAProxy has 2 certificates of different
key types; one ECDSA and one RSA. In the current codebase, if no SNI is
used, the certificate that is used will be whichever certificate is the
http/2 takes how web sites have been architected for the last decade and
turns it upside down, so I suspect it will take a while to really take
hold. On haproxy's roadmap http/2 is in the uncategorized section. =P Also
many people think that the TLS overhead that browsers have forced on http/2
I’ve coded up the functionality to check all of the intermediate
certificates to ensure that they match the private key of the crt file.
I’ve decided to toggle this functionality as a config option. Users can
either choose to disable this entire feature (default), match only the
private key/cert,
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 04:26:58PM +0200, Lukas Tribus wrote:
Currently we mostly use RSA certificates. ECC (ECDSA) are different
certificates and
until RSA certificates are fully removed from the industry, we will have to
support both.
The change, if I understand correctly, allows serving
No, I do not handle that case at the moment. This is the kind of feedback
I¹m looking for so thanks!
I will start modifying the code to try to accommodate this.
Any thoughts on the version of OpenSSL to try to code to?
-Dave
On 6/24/15, 11:54 AM, Lukas Tribus luky...@hotmail.com wrote:
Does
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 09:51:36AM -0600, Shawn Heisey wrote:
I was going to comment on the blog post so the author would see the
request to put together a complete config with multiple front ends and
back ends, with all of them using every one of the DDOS techniques
included on the blog post.
Hi Willy,
I am happy to follow-up on the thread. Long story short - based on your
suggestions we did further experiments with the setup and good news is things
got improved. Thank you. Short summary would be:
- cpu idle increased from 50%-80%
- system avg load decreased from 8 - 3
-
On 6/24/15, 2:58 PM, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu wrote:
What I'm understanding here is that instead of using SNI only as the key
to pick a cert, we want the (SNI, algo) combination. Coudln't we have two
certs per SNI entry ? One in RSA form, the other one in ECDSA, and only
provide what is supported
On Thursday, June 11, 2015 5:42 PM, Eduard Rushanyan
eduard.rushan...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi Willy,
Many thanks for your time and all the suggestions. This looks great.
I imagine we are going to try those and experiment for the next few days. I
guess we'll hold off on the process binding
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 03:06:32PM +, Dave Zhu (yanbzhu) wrote:
Hey Willy,
Lukas explained it pretty well, but I can expound on it some more.
You can imagine a situation where HAProxy has 2 certificates of different
key types; one ECDSA and one RSA. In the current codebase, if no SNI
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 10:26:24AM -0600, Shawn Heisey wrote:
When http/2 support lands in haproxy, will http/2 support also be
required on the back end to take advantage of it?
To add to what CJ Ess said, I'd mention that the real gains of HTTP/2
are between the client and the first point in
33 matches
Mail list logo
