Dear Sir,
Here recommand our popular products as below:
1. A4 copy paper
2. Newsprint paper
3. Offset paper
4. Coated paper
5. Carbonless paper
Please select the type you are most interested in and we will send the
quotations.
Waiting for your kind response.
Regards
Judy
On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 12:34:45AM +0100, Cyril Bonté wrote:
> And after performing the same tests with the patch applied, I can confirm I
> don't reproduce the issue anymore ;-)
Cool, thanks for your feedback Cyril!
Willy
Hi all,
Le 21/12/2017 à 15:25, Willy Tarreau a écrit :
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 02:53:07PM +0100, Emeric Brun wrote:
Hi All,
This bug should be fixed using this patch (patch on dev, abd should be
backported in 1.8).
now applied to both branches,, thanks!
Willy
And after performing the
Hi Kai,
I'm Brian. I found you at lautaportti.wordpress.com and wanted to reach out to
see if you ever take on any freelance dev work? If you do then I'd like to
invite you to join our curated freelance network LocalSolo.
We aren't a big funded startup, we're just a small team of working
Well, I isolate the service on a load balancer server with the minimal
configuration, let me detail the problem.
Two equal (cloned) Debian load balancers with 3.16.7-ckt9 kernel, both
working with keepalived sharing the ip address of the proxy-tcp service
(192.168.1.100). In A server the Haproxy
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 02:53:07PM +0100, Emeric Brun wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> This bug should be fixed using this patch (patch on dev, abd should be
> backported in 1.8).
now applied to both branches,, thanks!
Willy
On 21/12/17 13:28, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 10:46:17AM +, Bertrand Jacquin wrote:
>> I'm all good with backporting this in 1.8. Feel free to.
>
> Great, now merged. Do not hesitate to report back any issues you
> would notice on your infrastructure.
Thanks Willy, sure
Hi All,
This bug should be fixed using this patch (patch on dev, abd should be
backported in 1.8).
R,
Emeric
On 12/21/2017 10:42 AM, Greg Nolle wrote:
> Thanks guys! I should be able to test the new version this weekend if you are
> able to issue it before then.
>
> Best regards,
> Greg
>
>
HAProxy crashes when one use a bogus mode with core.register_service().
The 2nd argument must be "http" or "tcp", but any other value crashes
HAProxy
when it displays the error message.
To reproduce:
haproxy.cfg:
global
lua-load crash.lua
crash.lua:
function f() end
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 10:46:17AM +, Bertrand Jacquin wrote:
> I'm all good with backporting this in 1.8. Feel free to.
Great, now merged. Do not hesitate to report back any issues you
would notice on your infrastructure.
cheers,
Willy
Le 21/12/2017 à 08:42, Peter Lindegaard Hansen a écrit :
update:
we've disabled h2 on 1.8, and everything is running as expected again.
haproxy does not degrade performance anymore nor does it segfault.
so it issues seem to be related to the h2
Med venlig hilsen
*Peter Lindegaard Hansen*
You are right.
We've followed this manual:
https://haproxy.debian.net/#?distribution=Debian=jessie=1.8
# haproxy -vv
HA-Proxy version 1.8.1-1~bpo8+1 2017/12/04
Copyright 2000-2017 Willy Tarreau
Build options :
TARGET = linux2628
CPU = generic
CC = gcc
Hi Willy,
On 21/12/17 10:08, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 11:05:30AM +0100, Andreas Mahnke wrote:
>> Hi Willy,
>>
>> The support of the standard protocol in 1.8 would be nice, because we are
>> planning to migrate to haproxy 1.8 from our self - patched 1.7 instances.
>
> OK.
Hi, Emeric
got it.
Thanks a lot
Mike
At 2017-12-21 18:19:50, "Emeric Brun" wrote:
>Hi Mike,
>
>Thierry is right, 4096 rsa key computation have clearly an heavy CPU cost.
>In our internal benchmark we notice:
>Using one process of haproxy on one core of
Hi Mike,
Thierry is right, 4096 rsa key computation have clearly an heavy CPU cost.
In our internal benchmark we notice:
Using one process of haproxy on one core of i7-4790K CPU @ 4.00GHz we reach 170
con/s (comparatively 1350 con/s using 2048 rsa key).
Usually this CPU usage isn't so high
Le 20/12/2017 à 02:44, Andrew Heberle a écrit :
I am attempting to utilise certificate bundles so we can have multi-type
certs in haproxy however this seems non-functional.
I have a two cert bundles as follows (only testing with RSA certs at the
moment):
/etc/haproxy/ssl # ls -l
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 11:05:30AM +0100, Andreas Mahnke wrote:
> Hi Willy,
>
> The support of the standard protocol in 1.8 would be nice, because we are
> planning to migrate to haproxy 1.8 from our self - patched 1.7 instances.
OK. Bertrand, if you don't scream quickly, I'll pick your patches
Hi Willy,
The support of the standard protocol in 1.8 would be nice, because we are
planning to migrate to haproxy 1.8 from our self - patched 1.7 instances.
Regards,
Andreas
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 10:57 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Bertrand, Andreas,
>
> The NS CIP fixes were
❦ 21 décembre 2017 09:00 GMT, Maximilian Böhm :
> We are using HA-Proxy version 1.8.1-1~bpo8+1 2017/12/04 on Debian 8. On the
> backend, jetty 9.3.11.v20160721 with http/1.1 answers requests.
>
> Since I've enabled http/2 ("alpn h2,http/1.1"), we are facing issues
Bertrand, Andreas,
The NS CIP fixes were backported to 1.8. Initially I was not considering
backporting your latest changes to support the new version of the protocol
since it's a feature addition. But now that I'm thinking about it, the
change is minimal and very well isolated and you very
Thanks guys! I should be able to test the new version this weekend if you
are able to issue it before then.
Best regards,
Greg
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 12:15 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 12:04:11AM +0100, Cyril Bonté wrote:
> > Hi Greg,
> >
> > Le 20/12/2017 à
Hi there,
thanks for releasing support for http/2! Sadly, we are facing issues since
enabling it.
We are using HA-Proxy version 1.8.1-1~bpo8+1 2017/12/04 on Debian 8. On the
backend, jetty 9.3.11.v20160721 with http/1.1 answers requests.
Since I've enabled http/2 ("alpn h2,http/1.1"), we are
22 matches
Mail list logo