Haproxy Developers,
I recently modified a configuration file for haproxy, and after setting it up,
I noticed that about half of my requests came back with a 503 error, and the
other half came back with the correct elements being returned.
After doing troubleshooting involving a test haproxy ins
Hi, Willy!
If it could be interesting, I got a new core with exactly the same
backtrace:
Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
#0 0x563f5373bf21 in __pendconn_free (p=0x563f560db0c8) at
src/queue.c:296
296 HA_ATOMIC_SUB(&p->strm->be->nbpend, 1);
(gdb) bt
#0 0x563f53
Willy,
On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 2:30 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> More or less. I'd rather return a 3rd case, like with do with samples :
> "not sure yet" (need more data to decide). That allows the failure and
> success cases to remain definitive.
Indeed, that what I was trying to say with: "to wai
Hello Aurélien,
On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 02:13:31PM +0100, Aurélien Nephtali wrote:
> > Probably that we could in fact extend the CLI syntax in a backwards
> > compatible
> > way :
> >
> >[ ]* *
> >[optional body]
> >
> > Most commands don't use a body. Those using a body have to terminate
On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 09:48:11AM +, Pieter Vogelaar wrote:
> Does use-server also accept some keyword to address the first server in the
> backend instead of a specific valid server name of the backend?
Hmmm no there's no such feature. I'm not sure I'm seeing well the real
use case to be hon
Hello Willy,
On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 8:37 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Quotes could be part of some future statements and we'd
> possibly regret having used them if already used for this. For example we
> could
> imagine one day uploading some JSON parts for certain things.
True, but it could also
Yeah I did put it in the wrong queue. Sorry about that guys.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 6, 2018, at 1:09 AM, Johan Hendriks wrote:
>
> Tom, this list is for the loadbalancer software haproxy, so i think you
> mailed the wrong list.
>
> Regards
> Johan Hendriks
>
> Op 6 mrt. 2018 06:41 s
thanks I am trying 4.16-rc4 now and it looks good.
cheers Adrian.
Am 06.03.2018 um 12:05 schrieb Lukas Tribus:
> On 6 March 2018 at 11:38, Adrian Veith wrote:
>> I had this hang in haproxy after trying out kernel 4.16.0-041600rc1
>> after starting haproxy for some minutes. Now I am back on kern
Hello,
On 6 March 2018 at 11:38, Adrian Veith wrote:
> I had this hang in haproxy after trying out kernel 4.16.0-041600rc1
> after starting haproxy for some minutes. Now I am back on kernel
> 4.15.0-10-generic and everything seems ok so far.
Yeah, this is a kernel bug, you need the fix:
netfilt
Hello Willy,
On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 7:25 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> I tend to think (first idea out of my head) that for such file types,
> we could very well consider that the command reads multiple lines and
> stops at the first empty line. That's very convenient to use in scripts
> and even by
I had this hang in haproxy after trying out kernel 4.16.0-041600rc1
after starting haproxy for some minutes. Now I am back on kernel
4.15.0-10-generic and everything seems ok so far.
Adrian Veith
[ 9063.536247] INFO: task haproxy:1234 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
[ 9063.536334] Tainte
Does use-server also accept some keyword to address the first server in the
backend instead of a specific valid server name of the backend?
That would save quite a bit logic complexity in Puppet.
Best regards,
Pieter Vogelaar
Op 02-03-18 15:41 heeft Willy Tarreau geschreven:
On Fri, M
12 matches
Mail list logo
