Hi,
Le 2018-11-28 06:31, Gold Star a écrit :
We use HAProxy for HTTP load balancing in our company. We run HAProxy
inside a docker container. We would like to run multiple HAProxy
containers for High Availability. In particular, we would like to:
* run say, 10 HAProxy containers (1
No worries as long it is fixed. Cheers !
On Wed, 28 Nov 2018 at 03:25, Willy Tarreau wrote:
>
> Hi David,
>
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 09:17:20AM +, David CARLIER wrote:
> > Hi there,
> >
> > Here a tiny change to make every OS "happy" when displaying the extra bytes.
> >
> > Hope it s good
We use HAProxy for HTTP load balancing in our company. We run HAProxy
inside a docker container. We would like to run multiple HAProxy containers
for High Availability. In particular, we would like to:
- run say, 10 HAProxy containers (1 HAProxy per container) to handle the
incoming traffic
Hi Pieter,
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 11:17:42PM +0100, PiBa-NL wrote:
> I've changed the the script to include the LEVEL parameter almost the way
> the Makefile used it, changed behavior though so without the parameter it it
> runs all tests.
(...)
> New path attached, which includes a LEVEL check.
Hi Veiko,
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 07:59:50PM +, Veiko Kukk wrote:
> Hi!
>
> There is not much to add, just that it's been broken before in 1.7.9 and is
> again broken in 1.7.11. Works with 1.7.10.
> When applying patch provided here
>
Hi David,
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 09:17:20AM +, David CARLIER wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Here a tiny change to make every OS "happy" when displaying the extra bytes.
>
> Hope it s good enough.
Thanks, I think we fixed it at the same time :-)
However I used an unsigned long long instead of
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 12:42:06PM +0100, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> While cleaning up my local branches I noticed that this patch is not yet
> merged and probably slipped through.
>
> Message-ID: 20180915224230.12922-1-...@bastelstu.be
> Archive :
Hi Frederic, Willy,
Op 27-11-2018 om 15:00 schreef Frederic Lecaille:
On 11/27/18 10:44 AM, Frederic Lecaille wrote:
On 11/27/18 9:52 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Hi guys,
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 09:45:25AM +0100, Frederic Lecaille wrote:
I put the script in the /reg-tests/ folder. Maybe it
Alberto wrote:
For example, if you've bought your wildcard cert from comodo, it would go like
this:
cat STAR_your_domain.crt COMODORSADomainValidationSecureServerCA.crt
COMODORSAAddTrustCA.crt AddTrustExternalCARoot.crt STAR_your_domain.key >
STAR_your_domain.pem
I don’t believe you should
On 11/27/18 10:44 AM, Frederic Lecaille wrote:
On 11/27/18 9:52 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Hi guys,
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 09:45:25AM +0100, Frederic Lecaille wrote:
I put the script in the /reg-tests/ folder. Maybe it should have been
besides the Makefile in the / root ?
Yes I think it
On 11/27/18 9:52 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Hi guys,
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 09:45:25AM +0100, Frederic Lecaille wrote:
I put the script in the /reg-tests/ folder. Maybe it should have been
besides the Makefile in the / root ?
Yes I think it should be placed at the same level as the Makefile.
Hi there,
Here a tiny change to make every OS "happy" when displaying the extra bytes.
Hope it s good enough.
Kind regards.
From edb65e47c6230d23d1078e41a603b7e5df3c9ac6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Carlier
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 15:02:38 +
Subject: [PATCH] BUILD/SMALL: htx: Fix
Hi guys,
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 09:45:25AM +0100, Frederic Lecaille wrote:
> > I put the script in the /reg-tests/ folder. Maybe it should have been
> > besides the Makefile in the / root ?
>
> Yes I think it should be placed at the same level as the Makefile.
Well, we already have a "scripts"
On 11/25/18 4:59 PM, PiBa-NL wrote:
Hi Frederic, Willy,
Hi Pieter,
Added the varnishtest script we have been discussing as a .patch this time.
I put the script in the /reg-tests/ folder. Maybe it should have been
besides the Makefile in the / root ?
Yes I think it should be placed at the
14 matches
Mail list logo
