Re: [RFC PATCH] BUG/MINOR: systemd: Remove configuration check for reloads

2019-09-30 Thread William Lallemand
On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 01:13:27AM +0200, Tim Düsterhus wrote: > William, > > Am 01.10.19 um 01:09 schrieb William Lallemand: > > Found this in the Debian BTS: > > > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=936032 > > > > Apparently my Google Foo was insufficient to find that bug.

Re: [RFC PATCH] BUG/MINOR: systemd: Remove configuration check for reloads

2019-09-30 Thread Tim Düsterhus
William, Am 01.10.19 um 01:09 schrieb William Lallemand: > Found this in the Debian BTS: > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=936032 > Apparently my Google Foo was insufficient to find that bug. As it's a systemd bug and as it's recognized as such by systemd upstream we

Re: [RFC PATCH] BUG/MINOR: systemd: Remove configuration check for reloads

2019-09-30 Thread William Lallemand
On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 12:41:33AM +0200, Tim Duesterhus wrote: > Willy, William, Vincent, > Hello Tim, > apparently systemd's behaviour changed regarding reloads. When one of the > reload commands fails it apparently starts stopping the service. > > At first I thought it was some bad systemd

[RFC PATCH] BUG/MINOR: systemd: Remove configuration check for reloads

2019-09-30 Thread Tim Duesterhus
Willy, William, Vincent, apparently systemd's behaviour changed regarding reloads. When one of the reload commands fails it apparently starts stopping the service. At first I thought it was some bad systemd configuration on my end, but after seeing HAProxy die on me for the bazillionth time

Re: HAProxy bottleneck/tuning

2019-09-30 Thread Emmanuel BILLOT
Thanks for the answer. Le lun. 30 sept. 2019 à 05:51, Willy Tarreau a écrit : > Hi, > > On Sat, Sep 28, 2019 at 07:07:02PM +0200, Emmanuel BILLOT wrote: > > Hi, > > > > We use HAProxy as a LB for many usage, including LB for Squid and user > > acces on Internet. > > Users frequently grumble

Do you need redesign of your site at the address https://www.haproxy.com or another original software?

2019-09-30 Thread Igor
Hello. I can make a new high-quality fast website in the adaptive layout at the price from $300 for your nice project at the address https://www.haproxy.com (HAProxy Technologies | The World’s Fastest and Most Widely Used Software Load Balancer). As well I can do complicated web applications,

RE: WebSocket connection upgrade not using tunnel timeout

2019-09-30 Thread Rabie Van Der Merwe
I seem to have found the cause. If I specify cache for that backend then the 'timeout tunnel' no longer works, if I comment out caching then the timeout applies. Is this expected behaviour? I'm using the following in my backend: -- http-request cache-use cache01 http-response

RE: WebSocket connection upgrade not using tunnel timeout

2019-09-30 Thread Rabie Van Der Merwe
Small correction I'm still on 1.8.20. I have since managed to do a tcpdump on the HAProxy box for the backend connection to the web/socket server. I can see that HAProxy forwards the connection upgrade request, the connection is upgraded and I can see websocket traffic (viewing dump in WireShark).

Re: using hashicorp vault for storing SSL certs

2019-09-30 Thread Pavlos Parissis
On Κυριακή, 29 Σεπτεμβρίου 2019 7:52:12 Μ.Μ. CEST Илья Шипицин wrote: > hello, > > is anybody using https://www.vaultproject.io/docs/secrets/pki/index.html > for storing certs ? (I want to avoid reinventing the wheel here) > > thanks, > Ilya Shipitcin > I have, but with a different system, but

HAProxyConf 2019 - Early Bird Tickets Deadline Extended

2019-09-30 Thread Senad Caus
Hello, Due to popular demand we've decided to extend the sale of Early Bird tickets for the inaugural HAProxyConf for one more week. The new deadline is October 7th. After that, you can still purchase tickets at the regular price. The number of attendees is limited, so please make sure to

Re: [PATCH 2/2] BUG/MINOR: lua: Make the arrays in the list of headers 1-indexed

2019-09-30 Thread Thierry Fournier
> On 30 Sep 2019, at 05:40, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > Hi guys, > > On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 04:35:31PM +0200, Tim Düsterhus wrote: >> Adis, >> >> Am 26.09.19 um 16:01 schrieb Adis Nezirovic: >>> While I agree that using zero based array indexing is a mistake (wearing >>> my Lua hat), I don't