Re: VTest issue when built on Ubuntu 20.04

2020-07-31 Thread Илья Шипицин
пт, 31 июл. 2020 г. в 14:29, Willy Tarreau : > On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 12:18:14PM +0500, ??? wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I see permanent error on Ubuntu 20.04 / s390 > > > > https://travis-ci.com/github/chipitsine/haproxy/jobs/366958312#L623 > > > > I will report to VTest, but if anyone

Re: missing date() fetcher in lua api in haproxy 2.2

2020-07-31 Thread Christopher Faulet
Le 29/07/2020 à 01:29, James Brown a écrit : In earlier versions of haproxy, the txn.f object had a `date()` method when called from a fetch context which returned the current unix timestamp. In HAproxy 2.2, this method is removed. [...] My best guess is that this is related to ae6f125c

Re: [ANNOUNCE] haproxy-1.9.16

2020-07-31 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 03:15:07PM +0200, Tim Düsterhus wrote: > Christopher, > Willy, > > Am 31.07.20 um 14:14 schrieb Christopher Faulet: > > The 1.9 branch is EOL now. Thus, it is the last 1.9 release. No further > > release > > should be expected. It contains all pending patches marked to

[ANNOUNCE] haproxy-2.3-dev2

2020-07-31 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi, HAProxy 2.3-dev2 was released on 2020/07/31. It added 44 new commits after version 2.3-dev1. As usual in the early cycle, many of them are fixes that also affect the latest stable branch, but given that there were enough to crash the process in various ways, those starting to play with

Re: [ANNOUNCE] haproxy-1.9.16

2020-07-31 Thread Tim Düsterhus
Christopher, Willy, Am 31.07.20 um 14:14 schrieb Christopher Faulet: > The 1.9 branch is EOL now. Thus, it is the last 1.9 release. No further > release > should be expected. It contains all pending patches marked to be backported > to > the 1.9 to leave it in a proper state. Have a look at

[ANNOUNCE] haproxy-2.0.17

2020-07-31 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi, HAProxy 2.0.17 was released on 2020/07/31. It added 19 new commits after version 2.0.16. It's not much, nothing is likely to hit anybody who was not already hit, but we thought it was worth flushing the pipe. In short (some of them copied from the 2.1 announce): - various DNS fixes

[ANNOUNCE] haproxy-2.1.8

2020-07-31 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi, HAProxy 2.1.8 was released on 2020/07/31. It added 82 new commits after version 2.1.7. It's been more than a month since previous version, so fixes have started to accumulate, for sure. I'll try to summarize since most of these were already mentioned over the last 2.2 releases: - various

[ANNOUNCE] haproxy-1.9.16

2020-07-31 Thread Christopher Faulet
Hi, HAProxy 1.9.16 was released on 2020/07/31. It added 86 new commits after version 1.9.15. The 1.9 branch is EOL now. Thus, it is the last 1.9 release. No further release should be expected. It contains all pending patches marked to be backported to the 1.9 to leave it in a proper state.

[ANNOUNCE] haproxy-2.2.2

2020-07-31 Thread Christopher Faulet
Hi, HAProxy 2.2.2 was released on 2020/07/31. It added 16 new commits after version 2.2.1. It fixes some bugs in the DNS part. First, Jérome fixed a possible NULL pointer dereference leading to a segfault when a server status is updated based on a name resolution if the corresponding DNS

Re: [PATCH] suppress "return value is not checked" warnings

2020-07-31 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 02:32:02PM +0500, ??? wrote: > > Probably we should proceed differently and have something like these > > for the cases where no return is desired: > > > > fcntl_noret() => unchecked fcntl() > > setsockopt_noret() => unchecked setsockopt() > > > > Both

Re: [PATCH] suppress "return value is not checked" warnings

2020-07-31 Thread Илья Шипицин
пт, 31 июл. 2020 г. в 14:26, Willy Tarreau : > Hi Ilya, > > On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 03:06:06PM +0500, ??? wrote: > > From e5a49969d374e3e8e9da695dca48cb6fa82ca13d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: Ilya Shipitsin > > Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2020 15:01:10 +0500 > > Subject: [PATCH] CLEANUP:

Re: VTest issue when built on Ubuntu 20.04

2020-07-31 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 12:18:14PM +0500, ??? wrote: > Hello, > > I see permanent error on Ubuntu 20.04 / s390 > > https://travis-ci.com/github/chipitsine/haproxy/jobs/366958312#L623 > > I will report to VTest, but if anyone has an idea, please let me know. > it is a blocker for

Re: [PATCH] suppress "return value is not checked" warnings

2020-07-31 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi Ilya, On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 03:06:06PM +0500, ??? wrote: > From e5a49969d374e3e8e9da695dca48cb6fa82ca13d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Ilya Shipitsin > Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2020 15:01:10 +0500 > Subject: [PATCH] CLEANUP: suppress coverity warnings > > Coverity is not happy when

Re: [PATCH] CI: rework SSL_LIB, SSL_INC in more elegant way, improve build speed by switching to stock lib for openssl-1.1.1 builds

2020-07-31 Thread Илья Шипицин
пт, 31 июл. 2020 г. в 14:14, Willy Tarreau : > On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 01:01:49PM +0500, ??? wrote: > > From 2fd7431ed6e94fb48332e57ae569f194e38c1b11 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: Ilya Shipitsin > > Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 12:57:33 +0500 > > Subject: [PATCH] BUILD: simplify usage of

Re: [PATCH] typo fixes

2020-07-31 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 12:34:45AM +0500, ??? wrote: > Hello, > > another patch attached. Sorry for missing this one, applied now! thanks, Willy

Re: [PATCH] CI: rework SSL_LIB, SSL_INC in more elegant way, improve build speed by switching to stock lib for openssl-1.1.1 builds

2020-07-31 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 01:01:49PM +0500, ??? wrote: > From 2fd7431ed6e94fb48332e57ae569f194e38c1b11 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Ilya Shipitsin > Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 12:57:33 +0500 > Subject: [PATCH] BUILD: simplify usage of env defined variables > > if SLZ_INC, SLZ_LIB,

Re: [PATCH] typo fixes

2020-07-31 Thread Илья Шипицин
ping чт, 23 июл. 2020 г. в 00:34, Илья Шипицин : > Hello, > > another patch attached. > > Ilya Shipitcin >

Re: [PATCH] suppress "return value is not checked" warnings

2020-07-31 Thread Илья Шипицин
ping. вс, 26 июл. 2020 г. в 15:06, Илья Шипицин : > Hello, > > cleanup patch attached. > > > Ilya Shipitcin >

Re: [PATCH] CI: rework SSL_LIB, SSL_INC in more elegant way, improve build speed by switching to stock lib for openssl-1.1.1 builds

2020-07-31 Thread Илья Шипицин
sorry, one more patch пт, 31 июл. 2020 г. в 07:48, Willy Tarreau : > On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 02:13:14AM +0500, ??? wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I repaired SLZ build. > > > > it used to work earlier because of SSL_LIB, SSL_INC variables. > > Makes sense indeed, applied now, thanks! > Willy

VTest issue when built on Ubuntu 20.04

2020-07-31 Thread Илья Шипицин
Hello, I see permanent error on Ubuntu 20.04 / s390 https://travis-ci.com/github/chipitsine/haproxy/jobs/366958312#L623 I will report to VTest, but if anyone has an idea, please let me know. it is a blocker for upgrading to Ubuntu 20.04 Cheers, Ilya Shipitcin

Re: HAProxy 1.9 Snapshot generation broken?

2020-07-31 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 09:05:09AM +0200, Tim Düsterhus wrote: > Willy, > > Am 31.07.20 um 04:22 schrieb Willy Tarreau: > >> either I am dumb or it appears that the generation of HAProxy 1.9 > >> snapshots is broken. In > >> http://www.haproxy.org/download/1.9/src/snapshot/ the newest tarball is

Re: HAProxy 1.9 Snapshot generation broken?

2020-07-31 Thread Tim Düsterhus
Willy, Am 31.07.20 um 04:22 schrieb Willy Tarreau: >> either I am dumb or it appears that the generation of HAProxy 1.9 >> snapshots is broken. In >> http://www.haproxy.org/download/1.9/src/snapshot/ the newest tarball is >> from Jun, 12th. > > Wow, seems you're right! However I really don't