[PATCH] MEDIUM: sample: Enhances converter "bytes" to take variable names as arguments

2023-09-07 Thread Lokesh Jindal
Resending the patch with the right email subject. Previos email discussion - here . PFA the patch file. I have two questions in general: 1. Can you explain what this method does and why is it needed? (I used it in my patch

RE: [PATCH] BUG/MINOR: promex: don't count servers in maintenance

2023-09-07 Thread Cedric Paillet
> I guess you mean "backend_add_check_status". Because > "backend_agg_server_check_status" is a deprecated metric. It was replaced by > "backend_agg_server_status". Yes, sorry (and I should know, it's me who deprecated this value! )" In this patch both will be up updated, as it's the same code

Re: Odd bwlim Behavior

2023-09-07 Thread Christopher Faulet
Le 07/09/2023 à 14:52, Luke Seelenbinder a écrit : Could this fix: > BUG/MEDIUM: h1-htx: Ensure chunked parsing with full output buffer have caused this issue with bwlim? I was only able to replicate the behavior in HTTP/1.1. If your responses are chunked, it is possible. But only for

Re: [PATCH] BUG/MINOR: promex: don't count servers in maintenance

2023-09-07 Thread Christopher Faulet
Hi, Thanks Cedric and sorry for the delay. I have few comments. Le 01/09/2023 à 08:22, Cedric Paillet a écrit : The state of servers that were put in maintenance via the runtime API are reported within the "backend_agg_server_check_status" metric, which I guess you mean

Re: Odd bwlim Behavior

2023-09-07 Thread Luke Seelenbinder
Could this fix: > BUG/MEDIUM: h1-htx: Ensure chunked parsing with full output buffer have caused this issue with bwlim? I was only able to replicate the behavior in HTTP/1.1. Best, Luke — Luke Seelenbinder Stadia Maps | Founder & CEO stadiamaps.com > On Sep 2, 2023, at 16:02, Luke

Re: Haproxy 2.8 with Proxy Protocol v2 does not close connections

2023-09-07 Thread Lukas Tribus
On Thu, 7 Sept 2023 at 14:03, Tom Braarup wrote: > > Hello, > > After upgrading Haproxy from 2.7 to 2.8, with Nginx (1.25.0) as > backends and Proxy Protocol v2, the connections are not closed, > CLOSE_WAIT is increasing over time. No configuration changes apart from > the Haproxy version. 2.8.3

Haproxy 2.8 with Proxy Protocol v2 does not close connections

2023-09-07 Thread Tom Braarup
Hello, After upgrading Haproxy from 2.7 to 2.8, with Nginx (1.25.0) as backends and Proxy Protocol v2, the connections are not closed, CLOSE_WAIT is increasing over time. No configuration changes apart from the Haproxy version. Using Haproxy as backend will not create the same issue. Not

Haproxy Technologies LLC : Interested?

2023-09-07 Thread Joaquin Randolph
Hello, I’m briefly circling back on my previous update from recently: We're collaborating with organizations to reduce expenses to them up to 39% by changing business phone carriers. Would only take a minute or two to check what savings would be available. Is it okay to give you a brief ring

Re: [PATCH] BUILD: ssl: Build with new cryptographic library AWS-LC

2023-09-07 Thread Илья Шипицин
чт, 7 сент. 2023 г. в 00:05, Hopkins, Andrew : > I tried it and HAProxy doesn’t build with AWS-LC when quic is turned on. > There are at least two issues: > 1. AWS-LC’s TLS 1.3 cipher suite names are a little different, this is > easy to fix and I opened https://github.com/aws/aws-lc/pull/1175 >

[ANNOUNCE] haproxy-2.8.3

2023-09-07 Thread Christopher Faulet
Hi, HAProxy 2.8.3 was released on 2023/09/07. It added 49 new commits after version 2.8.2. Some bugs were fixed on QUIC side. Malformed ACK frames are now properly ignored. A possible wakeup loop on client connection closure was also fixed. RTT sampling might be ignored is some rare cases, when

haproxy.org : Top Page Google

2023-09-07 Thread phoebe
Hello *haproxy.org ,* Hope you are doing well. I was looking for Keywords and found your website, not in the top list on Google. If you were on page #1, you'd get so many prospects/new clients every day. Most of your targeted keywords are on pages #3-5. You're so close! Do

RE: [PATCH 0/1] Introduce 'NOROOM' status for srv_state metric

2023-09-07 Thread Cedric Paillet
Hi, Tanks for you feedbacks. > Indeed, so actually you found a pretty valid use case to the edge case I was > seeing as rare enough not to be of much interest :-) Just to provide some background, which might help in understanding our needs: In our real-life scenarios, servers do not have