Willy,
I will post results when available.
--
Evgeniy
On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu wrote:
On Mon, Apr 06, 2015 at 02:54:13PM +0200, Evgeniy Sudyr wrote:
this is server with 2x Intel I350-T4 1G Quad port NICs, where on first
card each NIC is connected to uplink
On Mon, Apr 06, 2015 at 12:34:05PM +0200, Evgeniy Sudyr wrote:
Hi Willy,
pleasure for me to get answer from you!
1) I've tested with OpenBSD's SP kernel and single process (no nbproc)
in haproxy.conf and it was no significant difference in load.
OK, I was not sure whether it was the SP
Hi Evgeniy,
On Sun, Apr 05, 2015 at 06:29:53PM +0200, Evgeniy Sudyr wrote:
Nenad,
thank your answer!
1) this is only Haproxy server active (active/passive config exists,
but using carp on OpenBSD).
2) As I understand with nbcproc 4 I can't get stats working correctly ...
however at
Hi Willy,
pleasure for me to get answer from you!
1) I've tested with OpenBSD's SP kernel and single process (no nbproc)
in haproxy.conf and it was no significant difference in load.
I can't test to disable PF to test, because it's some kind of production router.
2) I guess solution is to get
this is server with 2x Intel I350-T4 1G Quad port NICs, where on first
card each NIC is connected to uplink provider and 2nd NIC 4 ports are
used for trunk interface with lacp connected to internal 1Gb switch
with lacp configured as well. I've tested uplinks and internal link
with iperf and was
On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 2:54 PM, Evgeniy Sudyr eject.in...@gmail.com wrote:
Btw, where Pavlos reported his test results? There in list or somewhere else?
On this ML.
Pavlos was running Linux ;)
Baptiste
On Mon, Apr 06, 2015 at 02:54:13PM +0200, Evgeniy Sudyr wrote:
this is server with 2x Intel I350-T4 1G Quad port NICs, where on first
card each NIC is connected to uplink provider and 2nd NIC 4 ports are
used for trunk interface with lacp connected to internal 1Gb switch
with lacp configured
Lukas, thank you for pointing to possible keep-alive issues, I've
tested it before, but did it again just to make one more check!
I've increased keep alives timeout to 10se and removed
http-server-close, restarted haproxy :)
Changes I've noted - haproxy reduced from AVG 78% to AVG 75% per each
Evgeniy,
On 4/5/2015 4:47 PM, Evgeniy Sudyr wrote:
Lukas, thank you for pointing to possible keep-alive issues, I've
tested it before, but did it again just to make one more check!
I've increased keep alives timeout to 10se and removed
http-server-close, restarted haproxy :)
Changes I've
Hi all,
haproxy is used for http and https load balancing with TLS termination
on haproxy side.
I'm using openbsd -stable on this box. I got CPU saturated with
250Mbps traffic in/out summary on frontend NICs and 3000 ESTABLISHED
connections on frontent interface to haproxy.
Remove:
Hi all,
haproxy is used for http and https load balancing with TLS termination
on haproxy side.
I'm using openbsd -stable on this box. I got CPU saturated with
250Mbps traffic in/out summary on frontend NICs and 3000 ESTABLISHED
connections on frontent interface to haproxy.
# all connections to
Nenad,
thank your answer!
1) this is only Haproxy server active (active/passive config exists,
but using carp on OpenBSD).
2) As I understand with nbcproc 4 I can't get stats working correctly ...
however at the moment I see that for https frontend I have :
Current connection rate:58/s
12 matches
Mail list logo
