>
> What do others think ? Igor maybe you have a particular opinion on
> this one ? Baptiste, anything from the dynamic use cases you're aware
> of ?
>
>
Hi Willy,
I did some backlog and yes the use case around "external LB to multiple
kubernetes clusters" is "real" (it's even a common use case).
HI Willy,
On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 8:56 PM Willy Tarreau wrote:
>
> Hi Romain,
>
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 12:55:31PM +, Morotti, Romain D wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Patch attached. Adding an option "http-check send-name-header ".
> > It adds a header per server in healthchecks, similar usage t
Hi Romain,
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 12:55:31PM +, Morotti, Romain D wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Patch attached. Adding an option "http-check send-name-header ".
> It adds a header per server in healthchecks, similar usage to
> "http-send-name-header". Built and tested locally.
So I'm still not totall
ample.com:1234 check
-Original Message-
From: Willy Tarreau [mailto:w...@1wt.eu]
Sent: 23 October 2019 03:37
To: Igor Cicimov
Cc: Morotti, Romain D (CIB Tech, GBR) ; HAProxy
; Sayar, Guy H (CIB Tech, GBR)
Subject: Re: [PR/FEATURE] support for virtual hosts / Host header per server
On Wed, O
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 08:52:58AM +1100, Igor Cicimov wrote:
> Sorry misread your issue. It is a strange setup you got there wonder why do
> you need cross DC load balancing on the k8s ingress when you are already
> doing it globally via DNS?
Agreed, for me the setup is completely shifted by one
header, it’s
>> certainly important and I expect the healthcheck to get it too.
>>
>>
>>
>> Related questions and issues:
>>
>>
>> https://serverfault.com/questions/876871/configure-haproxy-to-include-host-headers-for-different-backends
>>
>
get it too.
>
>
>
> Related questions and issues:
>
>
> https://serverfault.com/questions/876871/configure-haproxy-to-include-host-headers-for-different-backends
>
>
> https://serverfault.com/questions/770737/making-haproxy-pass-a-host-name-in-httpcheck
>
>
> https://serverfau
t.eu]
Sent: 03 October 2019 05:51
To: Morotti, Romain D (CIB Tech, GBR)
Cc: haproxy@formilux.org; Sayar, Guy H (CIB Tech, GBR)
Subject: Re: [PR/FEATURE] support for virtual hosts / Host header per server
Hello Romain,
On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 12:08:03PM +, Morotti, Romain D wrote:
> What is
Hello Romain,
On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 12:08:03PM +, Morotti, Romain D wrote:
> What is the status on this?
Sorry, but it took some time to work on other priorities, and to be
honest, the subject looked scary enough to deserve enough time to
study it. Sadly, if I can say, the subject was pret
ux.org<mailto:haproxy@formilux.org>; Sayar, Guy H (CIB Tech,
GBR) mailto:guy.h.sa...@jpmorgan.com>>
Subject: Re: [PR/FEATURE] support for virtual hosts / Host header per server
Hi Romain,
Can you tell us (or me individually) why you can't use HAProxy with Kubernetes
because of t
gt; The lack of this functionality is a blocker to use HAProxy with kubernetes.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Willy Tarreau [mailto:w...@1wt.eu]
> Sent: 01 August 2019 04:59
> To: Morotti, Romain D
> Cc: haproxy@formilux.org
> Subject: Re: [PR/FEATURE] support for virtual h
What is the status on this?
The lack of this functionality is a blocker to use HAProxy with kubernetes.
-Original Message-
From: Willy Tarreau [mailto:w...@1wt.eu]
Sent: 01 August 2019 04:59
To: Morotti, Romain D
Cc: haproxy@formilux.org
Subject: Re: [PR/FEATURE] support for virtual
Hello Romain,
On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 04:02:04PM +, Morotti, Romain D wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Didn't get any reply here. Is anybody reviewing this mailing list?
Sorry about this but I simply think that most developers are busy
chasing complex bugs and since it's the holiday period it's more
diff
Hello,
Didn't get any reply here. Is anybody reviewing this mailing list?
One user reviewed the pull request and noticed missing braces around an if
section. https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/pull/167
Patch committed:
https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/compare/master...morotti:master
Regards.
14 matches
Mail list logo
