Hello,
I 'm using for many years an explicit web proxy solution based on HAProxy in
transparent mode in combination with a pair of linux load balancers
(keepalived) and some Squid servers behind it.
The Squid servers have the VRRP IP address as default gateway.
All users have defined in browser
Hi.
Am 28.07.2019 um 03:13 schrieb TomK:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to configure Haproxy w/ Keepalived to pass TLS encrypted traffic
> from
> the VIP to the underlying hosts which are also themselves running with TLS
> Certificates.
>
> Highlevel overview of the setup:
>
Hello,
I'm trying to configure Haproxy w/ Keepalived to pass TLS encrypted
traffic from the VIP to the underlying hosts which are also themselves
running with TLS Certificates.
Highlevel overview of the setup:
server1:7182 ( TLS Encrypted ) 10.0.0.1
server2:7182 ( TLS Encrypted
me that I've still got
something to learn..
Regards,
Jens Dueholm Christensen
-Original Message-
From: Willy Tarreau [mailto:w...@1wt.eu]
Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2012 6:36 PM
To: Jens Dueholm Christensen (JEDC)
Cc: haproxy@formilux.org
Subject: Re: haproxy with keepalived
Clearly
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 09:47:47PM +, Jens Dueholm Christensen (JEDC) wrote:
Hey Baptiste
You're very welcome - hopefully others can use it.
At least there was a (somewhat) reasonable explanation and easy fix to the
problem once I figured out what was happening.
I re-read my
(JEDC)
Cc: haproxy@formilux.org
Subject: Re: haproxy with keepalived
hey,
thanks for sharing your fix.
This is an interesting one :)
Baptiste
Hi
I've got a setup with haproxy and keepalived in front handling ~10 IP's.
When I was testing my setup (watching with tcpdump etc) I saw a strange
behaviour, that I eventually found a solution to a long while ago.
A bit of googling today lead me to answer 2 (answered Mar 16 '11 at 6:12
hey,
thanks for sharing your fix.
This is an interesting one :)
Baptiste
:
Maybe I have to ask this in the keepalived list.
I have 2 servers configured in debian with keepalived and haproxy.
Today I found that both servers are running.
You mean that both servers own the VIP ?
Of the 6 ip, 4 are answered by the master and 2 backup. it is dynamic.
Ip are exchanged
:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 08:08:37PM +0100, Esteban Torres Rodríguez wrote:
Maybe I have to ask this in the keepalived list.
I have 2 servers configured in debian with keepalived and haproxy.
Today I found that both servers are running.
You mean that both servers own the VIP
configured in debian with keepalived and haproxy.
Today I found that both servers are running.
You mean that both servers own the VIP ?
Of the 6 ip, 4 are answered by the master and 2 backup. it is dynamic.
Ip are exchanged randomly.
Is this what you're observing or what you want ? Also, my
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 08:08:37PM +0100, Esteban Torres Rodríguez wrote:
Maybe I have to ask this in the keepalived list.
I have 2 servers configured in debian with keepalived and haproxy.
Today I found that both servers are running.
You mean that both servers own the VIP ?
Willy
El día 21 de marzo de 2012 07:39, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu escribió:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 08:08:37PM +0100, Esteban Torres Rodríguez wrote:
Maybe I have to ask this in the keepalived list.
I have 2 servers configured in debian with keepalived and haproxy.
Today I found that both servers
Hey Esteban,
Your config looks good to me.
Sometimes it can happen that during failover not all servers receive
the gratuitous arp and they keep sending traffic to the backup router.
I normally force another failover to force another gratuitous arp get
it working again. It shouldn't happen
Maybe I have to ask this in the keepalived list.
I have 2 servers configured in debian with keepalived and haproxy.
Today I found that both servers are running.
Keepalived is assumed that this active-passive, but ..
When I stop a server, the other works perfectly!
I followed this manual
15 matches
Mail list logo
