Hi Cyril,
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 01:27:13AM +0200, Cyril Bonté wrote:
Hi again,
Le 30/04/2014 00:04, Cyril Bonté a écrit :
Hi,
Sorry but it's difficult to understand your test case.
OK, this time I think I could understand your issue and reproduce it.
The minimal setup I've used :
Hi again,
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 07:59:11AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
OK, this time I think I could understand your issue and reproduce it.
The minimal setup I've used :
defaults
mode http
listen test :80
balance url_param q
hash-type consistent
server
Bontécyril.bo...@free.fr;
Cc: Seriseri0...@naver.com; Lukas Tribusluky...@hotmail.com;
HAProxyhaproxy@formilux.org;
Sent: 2014-04-30 (수) 18:10:04
Subject: Re: in uri balance, http-keep-alive broken
Hi again,
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 07:59:11AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
OK, this time I think I could
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 06:21:40PM +0900, Seri wrote:
Hi,
This issue is reproduced in this environment( frontend(http-keep-alive),
backend(http-server-close) ).
In this environment(frontend(http-server-close), backend(http-server-close)),
this works well.
Even then, still no luck for me
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 11:49:20AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 06:21:40PM +0900, Seri wrote:
Hi,
This issue is reproduced in this environment( frontend(http-keep-alive),
backend(http-server-close) ).
In this environment(frontend(http-server-close),
Hi again Willy,
Le 30/04/2014 12:02, Willy Tarreau a écrit :
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 11:49:20AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 06:21:40PM +0900, Seri wrote:
Hi,
This issue is reproduced in this environment( frontend(http-keep-alive),
backend(http-server-close) ).
In
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 12:02:29PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 11:49:20AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 06:21:40PM +0900, Seri wrote:
Hi,
This issue is reproduced in this environment( frontend(http-keep-alive),
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 08:11:53PM +0200, Cyril Bonté wrote:
I've just seen the patch you've committed and can confirm I don't
reproduce the issue anymore.
Our mails have crossed :-)
Excellent, thanks for confirming! Well, I was ashamed for having done
that stupid a thing causing this bug :-/
Subject: Re: in uri balance, http-keep-alive broken
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 12:02:29PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 11:49:20AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 06:21:40PM +0900, Seri wrote:
Hi,
This issue is reproduced in this environment
On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 10:18:44AM +0900, Seri wrote:
Hi Willy, Cyril
It works very well.
Thanks for your helps.
thanks for your feedback!
Willy
Hi,
I've tested recent 1.5-dev24(a631fc8) git code.
In frontend,
option http-keep-alive
In backend,
balance uri or balance url_param
option http-server-close
In above configuration, server response is delayed or fail.
Apr 29 17:01:31 localhost haproxy[1901]: x.x.x.x:7352
Hi Seri,
Hi,
I've tested recent 1.5-dev24(a631fc8) git code.
In frontend,
option http-keep-alive
In backend,
balance uri or balance url_param
option http-server-close
In above configuration, server response is delayed or fail.
In a quick and unscientific test I was unable to
-param etc environment, is to support client-side only keep-alive.
Regards,
Seri
-Original Message-
From: Lukas Tribusluky...@hotmail.com
To: Seriseri0...@naver.com; HAProxyhaproxy@formilux.org;
Cc:
Sent: 2014-04-30 (수) 05:02:38
Subject: RE: in uri balance, http-keep-alive broken
Hi
Tribusluky...@hotmail.com; HAProxyhaproxy@formilux.org;
Cc:
Sent: 2014-04-30 (수) 06:41:22
Subject: RE: in uri balance, http-keep-alive broken
Hi Lukas,
I've tested in test environment, 1 client, 1 haproxy, 1 backend server.
Surely, no network, backend server issues.
In uri balance method, no issues
, issues are reproduced.
Your thread title talks about http-keep-alive broken but here you say
that issues occurs with balance uri_param (url_param ?), where in the
configuration below, I guess it uses a backend with option
http-server-close.
My test configuration as belows,
frontend http
Hi again,
Le 30/04/2014 00:04, Cyril Bonté a écrit :
Hi,
Sorry but it's difficult to understand your test case.
OK, this time I think I could understand your issue and reproduce it.
The minimal setup I've used :
defaults
mode http
listen test :80
balance url_param q
Hey guys,
Do you still want me to bisect? Or should I wait? If you think the
problem is the same I'll just test the fix :-)
Don't waste your time bisecting. I'll propose you to test the patch
instead. The problem I've seen is always the same and is related to
the fact that the SSL layer
Hi Lukas,
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 08:24:39PM +0100, Lukas Tribus wrote:
Hey guys,
Do you still want me to bisect? Or should I wait? If you think the
problem is the same I'll just test the fix :-)
Don't waste your time bisecting. I'll propose you to test the patch
instead. The
Hi Sander,
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 08:57:18AM +0100, Sander Klein wrote:
Hi,
I'm sorry you haven't heard from me yet. But I didn't have time to look
into this issue. Hope to do it this weekend.
Don't rush on it, Baptiste has reported to me a reproducible issue on his
lab which seems to
Heyz,
On 10.01.2014 09:14, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Hi Sander,
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 08:57:18AM +0100, Sander Klein wrote:
Hi,
I'm sorry you haven't heard from me yet. But I didn't have time to
look
into this issue. Hope to do it this weekend.
Don't rush on it, Baptiste has reported to me
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 10:47:51AM +0100, Sander Klein wrote:
Heyz,
On 10.01.2014 09:14, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Hi Sander,
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 08:57:18AM +0100, Sander Klein wrote:
Hi,
I'm sorry you haven't heard from me yet. But I didn't have time to
look
into this issue. Hope to
Hi,
I'm sorry you haven't heard from me yet. But I didn't have time to look
into this issue. Hope to do it this weekend.
Greets,
Sander
Hi guys,
On Sun, Jan 05, 2014 at 09:36:03PM +0100, Lukas Tribus wrote:
Hi,
Disabling epoll doesn't fix it... drat... Tested it with ss-20140104.
Could it be that it's a more subtle bug somewhere else?
If disabling epoll doesn't workaround that problem then another patch must
be the
On 06.01.2014 15:10, Willy Tarreau wrote:
I would go even further (using git). What I understand here is that the
issue
was introduced after the epoll optimization and is hidden by this one.
So I'd
rather start by reverting that patch and then looking up for another
faulty
patch after those :
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 06:21:47PM +0100, Sander Klein wrote:
On 06.01.2014 15:10, Willy Tarreau wrote:
I would go even further (using git). What I understand here is that the
issue
was introduced after the epoll optimization and is hidden by this one.
So I'd
rather start by reverting that
Hi,
Well, after spending some time compiling testing compiling testing I
finally found that the patch
0103-OPTIM-MEDIUM-epoll-fuse-active-events-into--1.5-dev19.diff done
between 20131115 and 20131116 is causing my problems.
I also found that this problem is much easier to reproduce on
Hey,
On 05.01.2014 17:33, Lukas Tribus wrote:
Hi,
Well, after spending some time compiling testing compiling testing I
finally found that the patch
0103-OPTIM-MEDIUM-epoll-fuse-active-events-into--1.5-dev19.diff done
between 20131115 and 20131116 is causing my problems.
I also found that
Hi,
Disabling epoll doesn't fix it... drat... Tested it with ss-20140104.
Could it be that it's a more subtle bug somewhere else?
If disabling epoll doesn't workaround that problem then another patch must
be the reason for this.
But, Yes, that is correct. 20131115 works and 2013116
Heyz,
On 03.01.2014 22:52, Lukas Tribus wrote:
Hi,
The problem I'm having (also tested with ss-20140101 yesterday)
happens
with http-keep-alive enabled and also when just running in tunnel
mode.
But, when http-keep-alive is enabled I get the problem with ~98% of
the
requests and in tunnel
Hey,
On 03.01.2014 22:52, Lukas Tribus wrote:
You said that one of your backends is exchange 2012. What release are
the
other ntlm-auth backends exactly and is the issue the same on all of
them?
All backends are windows 2012 with the standard IIS that comes with it.
I have the problem on
Hi Baptiste, Lukas,
@Lukas: Sorry I misread your tunnel-mode for tcp-mode. Tunnel-mode works
(almost) fine as you can read below.
I have been investigating my problem a bit more, and then I remembered
that I also updated haproxy a week before we started using our new
Windows 2012 servers.
Hi Sander,
In my configuration, I enabled option http-keep-alive in the default
section, that way, it is applied to all next frontend and backend.
Then you can disable it locally by prefixing the same option by no.
And it works :)
I've attached to this mail, the log session showing myself
Hi,
The problem I'm having (also tested with ss-20140101 yesterday) happens
with http-keep-alive enabled and also when just running in tunnel mode.
But, when http-keep-alive is enabled I get the problem with ~98% of the
requests and in tunnel mode I get it with ~10% of the requests.
On 31.12.2013 00:50, Lukas Tribus wrote:
Hi,
Subject: http-keep-alive broken?
Hi,
I'm using haproxy ss-20131229 to reverse proxy some windows iis server
with ntlm-auth enabled (one of them being exchange 2012).
While I understood that using 'option http-keep-alive' would make
ntlm-auth work
...@roedie.nl wrote:
On 31.12.2013 00:50, Lukas Tribus wrote:
Hi,
Subject: http-keep-alive broken?
Hi,
I'm using haproxy ss-20131229 to reverse proxy some windows iis server
with ntlm-auth enabled (one of them being exchange 2012).
While I understood that using 'option http-keep-alive' would make
Hi,
Wile I do agree that using tcp-mode would make stuff easier, I also need
to do some redirecting on the host-header. Which is AFAIK not possible
while in tcp-mode. (I might be wrong)
No, I really meant http mode, but in the (default) tunneling mode, which
can only analyze the first
Hi,
I'm using haproxy ss-20131229 to reverse proxy some windows iis server
with ntlm-auth enabled (one of them being exchange 2012).
While I understood that using 'option http-keep-alive' would make
ntlm-auth work, it doesn't work for me. Are there still some issue with
http-keep-alive and
Hi,
Subject: http-keep-alive broken?
Hi,
I'm using haproxy ss-20131229 to reverse proxy some windows iis server
with ntlm-auth enabled (one of them being exchange 2012).
While I understood that using 'option http-keep-alive' would make
ntlm-auth work, it doesn't work for me
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On 31.12.2013 00:50, Lukas Tribus wrote:
Hi,
Subject: http-keep-alive broken?
Hi,
I'm using haproxy ss-20131229 to reverse proxy some windows iis server
with ntlm-auth enabled (one of them being exchange 2012).
While I understood
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 03:22:43AM +0100, Thomas Heil wrote:
While I understood that using 'option http-keep-alive' would make
ntlm-auth work, it doesn't work for me. Are there still some issue with
http-keep-alive and ntlm-auth?
Honestly I would just use the default tunnel mode for
40 matches
Mail list logo
