Re: varnishtest with H2>HTX>H1(keep-alive)

2018-11-20 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi Pieter, On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 12:10:43AM +0100, PiBa-NL wrote: > I did notice there is one line regarding the 'double logging' I have got > configured though which I'm not sure is supposed to happen, its seems to be > because i'm having both stdout and :514 logging should that not be >

Re: varnishtest with H2>HTX>H1(keep-alive)

2018-11-20 Thread PiBa-NL
Hi Christopher, Willy, Op 20-11-2018 om 12:09 schreef Christopher Faulet: Hi, The H2 is not yet compatible with the HTX for now. So you should never use both in same time. However, this configuration error should be detected during the configuration parsing, to avoid runtime errors. Here

Re: varnishtest with H2>HTX>H1(keep-alive)

2018-11-20 Thread Christopher Faulet
Le 20/11/2018 à 08:36, Frederic Lecaille a écrit : However that still doesn't work yet (as also already seen by Frederic): **   c4    0.2 === txreq -req GET -url /3 ***  c4    0.2 tx: stream: 1, type: HEADERS (1), flags: 0x05, size: 37 **   c4    0.2 === rxresp ***  h1    0.2

Re: varnishtest with H2>HTX>H1(keep-alive)

2018-11-19 Thread Frederic Lecaille
On 11/19/18 8:10 PM, PiBa-NL wrote: Hi Willy, Op 19-11-2018 om 4:37 schreef Willy Tarreau: Hi Pieter, On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 01:07:44AM +0100, PiBa-NL wrote: Hi List, I'm trying (and failing?) to write a H2>HTX>H1(keepalive) test. Using haproxy 1.9-dev6-05b9b64. Test vtc attached, i

Re: varnishtest with H2>HTX>H1(keep-alive)

2018-11-19 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 08:10:15PM +0100, PiBa-NL wrote: > Ah crap, i 'thought' i took the latest commit from the online branch. And > stopped looking properly.  I must have been a few minutes to soon or > something, after i read the dev7 mail.. (and i should have checked i did > actually compile

Re: varnishtest with H2>HTX>H1(keep-alive)

2018-11-19 Thread PiBa-NL
Hi Willy, Op 19-11-2018 om 4:37 schreef Willy Tarreau: Hi Pieter, On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 01:07:44AM +0100, PiBa-NL wrote: Hi List, I'm trying (and failing?) to write a H2>HTX>H1(keepalive) test. Using haproxy 1.9-dev6-05b9b64. Test vtc attached, i added the 'option http-use-htx' to the

Re: varnishtest with H2>HTX>H1(keep-alive)

2018-11-19 Thread Frederic Lecaille
On 11/19/18 1:07 AM, PiBa-NL wrote: Hi List, Hi Pieter, Christopher is CC'ed. As your mail is about reg-testing I took a look at it. I'm trying (and failing?) to write a H2>HTX>H1(keepalive) test. Using haproxy 1.9-dev6-05b9b64. Test vtc attached, i added the 'option http-use-htx' to the

Re: varnishtest with H2>HTX>H1(keep-alive)

2018-11-18 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi Pieter, On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 01:07:44AM +0100, PiBa-NL wrote: > Hi List, > > I'm trying (and failing?) to write a H2>HTX>H1(keepalive) test. > > Using haproxy 1.9-dev6-05b9b64. > > Test vtc attached, i added the 'option http-use-htx' to the fe4 > frontend/backend. > Is there anything

varnishtest with H2>HTX>H1(keep-alive)

2018-11-18 Thread PiBa-NL
Hi List, I'm trying (and failing?) to write a H2>HTX>H1(keepalive) test. Using haproxy 1.9-dev6-05b9b64. Test vtc attached, i added the 'option http-use-htx' to the fe4 frontend/backend. Is there anything else that should be changed? Or is my way of making the H2 request incorrect? Though