Hi David,
On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 10:04:41AM +, David CARLIER wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here a little patch proposal to give names to threads for debug builds.
> If accepted it is not crucial can be seen after the soon 2.0 release.
I didn't know about this feature. Given that it's only for
Hello,
On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 at 15:12, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> > So does anyone have an opinion about the proposal above. Do not try
> > to be gentle, "this is stupid" or "don't change anything at this point"
> > are fine to me. I'd just want to be sure that whatever choice we make,
> > it will
Hi Baptiste,
On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 04:29:43PM +0200, Baptiste wrote:
> Last mail, this is not backportable. HAProxy 2.0+ only.
The second one is quite a substantial change at this stage where we're
finalizing cleanup and minor fixes. Given that it's only about improving
the load time, I
On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 03:11:55PM +0200, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> These aliases still have the issue that the development headers are not
> necessarily installed, even if the distro has the headers available.
OK.
> I'm
> not sure whether there even is a need to change anything at all:
>
> - The
Are you guys fine with these patches ?
Thanks,
willy
>From 573604dd22843805c0d8e47befc1453c2da80872 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Willy Tarreau
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 16:32:09 +0200
Subject: BUILD: makefile: rename "linux2628" to "linux-glibc" and remove older
targets
The linux targets have
Hi again,
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 07:17:29PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > To be honest, I don't think this is very common in OSS projects; most
> > of them use configure scripts that just include the library if the
> > headers are detected, or not link against it at all if it isn't there.
> >
Willy,
Am 14.06.19 um 15:01 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
> Hi again,
>
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 07:17:29PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
>>> To be honest, I don't think this is very common in OSS projects; most
>>> of them use configure scripts that just include the library if the
>>> headers are
On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 03:30:19PM +0200, Lukas Tribus wrote:
> I agree with Tim.
>
> I don't think anyone still deploys "heavily patched 2.4 kernels" and
> 2.6.28 is ancient itself, but a dependency. We can just call it Linux
> at this point.
>
> This removes the strange "2628" number which may
Hi again,
On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 05:25:34AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 05:31:09PM -0500, Dave Chiluk wrote:
> > I used the number of calls to setsockopt with SO_LINGER in them using the
> > following command.
> > $ sudo timeout 60s strace -e setsockopt,close -p $(ps
Hello, dev
The commit of ea8dd949e4ab7ddd94afdbf0e96087c883192217 seems to break
the allow-0rtt in server line, a connection will take very very long
to complete. Remove allow-0rtt it turns normal.
conf like:
listen test
mode tcp
bind 0.0.0.0:88
default_backend tls
backend tls
mode tcp
Hi Igor,
On Sat, Jun 15, 2019 at 03:00:23AM +0800, Igor Pav wrote:
> Hello, dev
>
> The commit of ea8dd949e4ab7ddd94afdbf0e96087c883192217 seems to break
> the allow-0rtt in server line, a connection will take very very long
> to complete. Remove allow-0rtt it turns normal.
Aie, not cool :-(
On Friday, June 14, 2019, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi Baptiste,
>
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 04:29:43PM +0200, Baptiste wrote:
> > Last mail, this is not backportable. HAProxy 2.0+ only.
>
> The second one is quite a substantial change at this stage where we're
> finalizing cleanup and minor fixes.
Hi all,
Given that we're talking about one of our oldest files and that
approximately no changes to it were made in the last 16 years,
I'm having strong doubts about the fact that anyone uses it. I'm
pretty sure it has been superseded with better maintained failes
from the distros by now. Does
Please remove the following email from this thread of emails:
todd.oh...@spidertracks.co.nz
On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 05:04:51PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Are you guys fine with these patches ?
>
> Thanks,
> willy
Looks fine to me. However, in my opinion we should have in addition a target
which evolves more frequently and contains the latest features. (lua, openssl,
etc)
Could be
On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 10:37:09PM +0200, William Lallemand wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 05:04:51PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > Are you guys fine with these patches ?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > willy
>
> Looks fine to me.
Thanks!
> However, in my opinion we should have in addition a target
>
On 6/14/2019 7:01 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
OK. When discussing this with William, we figured it could be interesting
instead to have some aliases which are maybe more symbolic, such as :
- linux-complete : full set of supported features, will simply fail
if you don't have all libs
Hi,
Here a little patch proposal to give names to threads for debug builds.
If accepted it is not crucial can be seen after the soon 2.0 release.
Thanks.
Kind regards.
From 6b1e5d77e0ef8c29673a5da4b22978c052394a9c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Carlier
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 10:00:06
18 matches
Mail list logo
