Re: Stick table counter not working after upgrade to 2.2.11

2021-03-22 Thread Bren
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Monday, March 22nd, 2021 at 3:06 PM, Sander Klein wrote: > Hi, > > I have upgraded to haproxy 2.2.11 today and it seems like my stick table > counter is not working anymore. I was going to upgrade to 2.2.11 soon so I tested this quick and can confirm that

Stick table counter not working after upgrade to 2.2.11

2021-03-22 Thread Sander Klein
Hi, I have upgraded to haproxy 2.2.11 today and it seems like my stick table counter is not working anymore. It is only increasing on every hit and never decreases anymore. Downgrading back to 2.2.10 fixes this issue. The setup is a replicated stick table like: ``` table apikey type ipv6

Re: [ANNOUNCE] haproxy-1.6.16

2021-03-22 Thread Lukas Tribus
Hello Willy, On Sat, 20 Mar 2021 at 10:09, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > 1.6 was EOL last year, I don't understand why there is a last release. > > There were some demands late last year and early this year to issue a > last one with pending fixes to "flush the pipe" but it was terribly > difficult

Re: [ANNOUNCE] haproxy-1.6.16

2021-03-22 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi Lukas, On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 12:21:02AM +0100, Lukas Tribus wrote: > I agree that finding the sweet spot can be difficult, but I have to > say I share Vincent's concerns. I do feel like currently we backport > *a lot*, especially on those near-EOLed trees. When looking at the > list of

Bid Writing, Fundraising and Volunteering Workshops

2021-03-22 Thread NFP Workshops
NFP WORKSHOPS Affordable Training Courses 18 Blake Street, York YO1 8QG01133 280988 Bid Writing: The Basics Do you know the most common reasons for rejection? Are you gathering the right evidence? Are you making the right arguments? Are you using the right terminology? Are your

Re: [2.2.9] 100% CPU usage

2021-03-22 Thread Maciej Zdeb
Hi Christopher, Thanks! I'm building a patched version and will return with feedback! Kind regards, pt., 19 mar 2021 o 16:40 Christopher Faulet napisał(a): > Le 16/03/2021 à 13:46, Maciej Zdeb a écrit : > > Sorry for spam. In the last message I said that the old process (after > reload) > >