Sarah Smith
Hi
Namailu User,
Thanks Igor, you pointed me to the correct answer. I removed the check.txt.
I am not sure how the file got missing, my systems were down for a few days
and I moved to KVM last night.
Regards,
- KK
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 11:56 AM, Igor Cicimov <
ig...@encompasscorporation.com> wrote:
> Forgot to
Forgot to cc the list.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Igor Cicimov
Date: Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 4:25 PM
Subject: Re: "proxy haproxy has no server available!"
To: "Krishna Kumar Unnikrishnan (Engineering)"
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 3:58 PM, Krishna Kumar Unnikrishnan (Engineering) <
It seems to be a problem with my configuration file. I tried the one from
Section 2.3
of haproxy.org/download/1.5/doc/configuration.txt, and it works good now:
global
log 127.0.0.1 local0
log 127.0.0.1 local1 notice
daemon
maxconn 256
defaults
log g
Thanks Igor for the suggestion. I get:
root@haproxy-2:/var/www# curl --http1.0 -X HEAD 192.168.122.101:80/check.txt
curl: (18) transfer closed with 168 bytes remaining to read
root@haproxy-2:/var/www# curl --http1.0 -X HEAD 192.168.122.102:80/check.txt
curl: (18) transfer closed with 168 bytes rem
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Krishna Kumar Unnikrishnan (Engineering) <
krishna...@flipkart.com> wrote:
> Sorry, forgot to mention, this is haproxy version 1.5.11
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 10:52 AM, Krishna Kumar Unnikrishnan (Engineering)
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I am moving from using
Sorry, forgot to mention, this is haproxy version 1.5.11
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 10:52 AM, Krishna Kumar Unnikrishnan (Engineering) <
krishna...@flipkart.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am moving from using LXC to KVM for haproxy on my Debian 7 system. When I
> start haproxy, I get this error:
> _
Hi all,
I am moving from using LXC to KVM for haproxy on my Debian 7 system. When I
start haproxy, I get this error:
_
Apr 7 10:38:22 localhost haproxy[3418]: Proxy haproxy started.
Apr 7 10:38:24 localhost haproxy[3420]: Server haproxy/nginx-1 is DOWN,
re
On Fri, 03 Apr 2015 11:10:31 +0200, Baptiste wrote:
> I mean what happens if you point your browser directly to one of the Ip
> address?
> Cause, what you're doing with your HAProxy configuration currently, is
> only forwarding the TCP connection from a browser client to a socks5
> server.
> If yo
HAproxy 1.5 on CentOS 7.
5 front-ends, 5 backends, mapped 1:1. Pure TCP mode. I'm basically
port-forwarding the backends from a different subnet.
The actual servers behind HAproxy are custom Tomcat apps capable of
handling lots of connections.
I suspect I cannot increase the global maxconn ind
On 06.04.2015 22:45, Pavlos Parissis wrote:
> On 06/04/2015 08:41 μμ, Brian Fleming wrote:
>> I can do reload and there will be no downtime?
>
> Yes, reload is a safe operation. But, don't be surprised if you see the
> old process alive for long time(days). This behavior is caused by insane
> time
On 06/04/2015 08:41 μμ, Brian Fleming wrote:
> I can do reload and there will be no downtime?
Yes, reload is a safe operation. But, don't be surprised if you see the
old process alive for long time(days). This behavior is caused by insane
timeout values on the client-side used by some people(inclu
Hoi,
While I was reading commit descriptions I saw in
REORG/MAJOR: session: rename the "session" entity to "stream"
[..snip..]
Some more cleanup is needed because some code was already far from
being clean. The server queue management still refers to sessions at
many places while comments talk ab
I can do reload and there will be no downtime?
On Mon, Apr 06, 2015 at 02:54:13PM +0200, Evgeniy Sudyr wrote:
> this is server with 2x Intel I350-T4 1G Quad port NICs, where on first
> card each NIC is connected to uplink provider and 2nd NIC 4 ports are
> used for trunk interface with lacp connected to internal 1Gb switch
> with lacp configure
On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 2:54 PM, Evgeniy Sudyr wrote:
> Btw, where Pavlos reported his test results? There in list or somewhere else?
On this ML.
Pavlos was running Linux ;)
Baptiste
this is server with 2x Intel I350-T4 1G Quad port NICs, where on first
card each NIC is connected to uplink provider and 2nd NIC 4 ports are
used for trunk interface with lacp connected to internal 1Gb switch
with lacp configured as well. I've tested uplinks and internal link
with iperf and was abl
On Mon, Apr 06, 2015 at 12:34:05PM +0200, Evgeniy Sudyr wrote:
> Hi Willy,
>
> pleasure for me to get answer from you!
>
> 1) I've tested with OpenBSD's SP kernel and single process (no nbproc)
> in haproxy.conf and it was no significant difference in load.
OK, I was not sure whether it was the
Hi Willy,
pleasure for me to get answer from you!
1) I've tested with OpenBSD's SP kernel and single process (no nbproc)
in haproxy.conf and it was no significant difference in load.
I can't test to disable PF to test, because it's some kind of production router.
2) I guess solution is to get s
Hello Jarno,
thanks for the response. First of all, it worked!
It was the issue that you mentioned with the 300sec SKEW. I compiled
haproxy with smaller value (30 :) ) and id returns the response :)
The test with the openssl that toy mentioned returns Verified OK. The
problem was the reffer
Hi Evgeniy,
On Sun, Apr 05, 2015 at 06:29:53PM +0200, Evgeniy Sudyr wrote:
> Nenad,
>
> thank your answer!
>
> 1) this is only Haproxy server active (active/passive config exists,
> but using carp on OpenBSD).
>
> 2) As I understand with nbcproc 4 I can't get stats working correctly ...
>
> ho
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 06, Vasileios Tzimourtos wrote:
> **/usr/bin/openssl ocsp -noverify -issuer $ROOT_CERT_FILE -cert
> $SERVER_CERT_FILE -url "$OCSP_URL" -no_nonce -header Host `echo
> "$OCSP_URL" | cut -d"/" -f3` -respout $OCSP_FILE**
> **echo "set ssl ocsp-response $(/usr/bin/base64 -w 1
> $OCS
Hello to all,
i have trouble on getting a ocsp response from haproxy when i ask him
with openssl. I will be detailing bellow all the steps i have taken and
i get a 'OCSP Response updated!' when i pass the setting to the haproxy
socket
The version of the haproxy that i use is as follows:
===
23 matches
Mail list logo
