[PATCH] BUILD: fix for non-transparent builds

Broke in dba9707713eb49a39b218f331c252fb09494c566. --- src/server.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/src/server.c b/src/server.c index 23343d86..536bf853 100644 --- a/src/server.c +++ b/src/server.c @@ -1742,12 +1742,14 @@ int parse_server(const char *file, int linenum, char

[PATCH] DOC: stick-table is available in frontend sections

Fix the proxy keywords matrix to reflect that it's permitted to use stick-table in frontend sections. Signed-off-by: Adam Spiers --- doc/configuration.txt | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/doc/configuration.txt b/doc/configuration.txt index

Re: [RFC][PATCHES] seamless reload

On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 04:56:47PM +0200, Pavlos Parissis wrote: > On 06/04/2017 04:25 μμ, Olivier Houchard wrote: > > Hi, > > > > The attached patchset is the first cut at an attempt to work around the > > linux issues with SOREUSEPORT that makes haproxy refuse a few new > > connections > >

Re: [RFC][PATCHES] seamless reload

On 06/04/2017 04:25 μμ, Olivier Houchard wrote: > Hi, > > The attached patchset is the first cut at an attempt to work around the > linux issues with SOREUSEPORT that makes haproxy refuse a few new connections > under heavy load. > This works by transferring the existing sockets to the new

[RFC][PATCHES] seamless reload

Hi, The attached patchset is the first cut at an attempt to work around the linux issues with SOREUSEPORT that makes haproxy refuse a few new connections under heavy load. This works by transferring the existing sockets to the new process via the stats socket. A new command-line flag has been

Re: HaProxy Hang

On Mon, 03 Apr 2017 12:45:57 -0400, Dave Cottlehuber wrote: On Mon, 13 Mar 2017, at 13:31, David King wrote: Hi All Apologies for the delay in response, i've been out of the country for the last week Mark, my gut feeling is that is network related in someway, so

Re: Certificate order

Hi Sander, On 2017-04-06 10:45, Sander Hoentjen wrote: Hi guys, We have a setup where we sometimes have multiple certificates for a domain. We use multiple directories for that and would like the following behavior: - Look in dir A for any match, use it if found - Look in dir B for any match,

Re: ssl & default_backend

El 03/04/17 a las 19:12, PiBa-NL escribió: Hi Antonio, Op 3-4-2017 om 13:29 schreef Antonio Trujillo Carmona: It's well documented that Windows XP with Internet Explorer don't support sni, so I try to redirect call

Certificate order

Hi guys, We have a setup where we sometimes have multiple certificates for a domain. We use multiple directories for that and would like the following behavior: - Look in dir A for any match, use it if found - Look in dir B for any match, use it if found - Look in dir .. etc This works great,