Hello,
My name is David,
I have contributed articles to sites like Business2Community (
http://www.business2community.com/strategy/4-important-key-areas-success-project-management-team-01687573#RukF6cTfu5DryqzW.97
) ,eLearning Industry (
https://elearningindustry.com/project-management-in-
Hi Lukas,
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 11:30:49PM +0100, Lukas Tribus wrote:
> Also consider this report from discourse:
> https://discourse.haproxy.org/t/haproxy1-8-3-dynamic-dns-resolvers-problem/1997
>
> Haproxy 1.8.3 with nbthread > 1 and while reloading, DNS resolutions fails.
> Its possibile thi
Hey guys,
On 15 January 2018 at 20:49, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Samuel,
>
> While running a few tests with Christopher's patch in order to integrate
> it, I managed to find a case where I'm still seeing quite a number of
> calls to epoll_wait(0)=0. Studying the patch, I found that there's a
> corne
Samuel,
While running a few tests with Christopher's patch in order to integrate
it, I managed to find a case where I'm still seeing quite a number of
calls to epoll_wait(0)=0. Studying the patch, I found that there's a
corner case which it doesn't address, which is where an fd is processed
and re
Title: é©æ°å±å®³ï¼ä»
æ¢äºæåé¢åä¹ï¼
ä½è
ï¼åå·ä¸æçªç
æ¥èªåä¿¡è
ï¼:å
æ¢ç¾å
ï¼æå
æ人æ°å¸ç»ä½ ï¼ä½ åç»ç¾å
ç»æï¼æ¯å½å¤©æ±çé«ï¼è¯¦æ
请å é»ç:æ£
æ£ 7825 53723ï¼æ
æº:135-3541-5522ï¼Vä¿¡åå·ï¼æ¬¢è¿åæ¥å¨è¯¢
Hello,
We started to use the server-template approach in which you basically
provision servers in backends using a "check disabled" state, then
re-enabling them using the Runtime API.
I recently noticed that when used with dynamic cookies, we end up
getting these warnings:
haproxy.c:149
Small update on this one: using a "path_beg" ACL it seems works...
So, I guess there is something wrong potentially outside of cache.c when
using path_end, but affecting the cache in some way.
I also noticed some suspicious entries in the cache, like hash=0, but
I'm not able to qualify when does
Hi.
Follow up question to proxy protocol
Is it possible to handle the Type-Length-Value (TLV) fields in from pp2
in haproxy config or in lua?
I refer to
2.2.7. Reserved type ranges
https://www.haproxy.org/download/1.8/doc/proxy-protocol.txt
from the question on so
https://stackoverflow.com
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 09:39:25AM -0600, Samuel Reed wrote:
> Reload is done via the sysvinit wrapper, which executes:
>
> $HAPROXY -f "$CONFIG" -p $PIDFILE -sf $(cat $PIDFILE) -D $EXTRAOPTS
>
> No $EXTRAOPTS are specified. We don't use unix sockets and we don't use
> master-worker. I'll send an
Reload is done via the sysvinit wrapper, which executes:
$HAPROXY -f "$CONFIG" -p $PIDFILE -sf $(cat $PIDFILE) -D $EXTRAOPTS
No $EXTRAOPTS are specified. We don't use unix sockets and we don't use
master-worker. I'll send an anonymized haproxy config directly to you
two along with the results of
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 03:28:12PM +0100, Christopher Faulet wrote:
> Could you provide the output of "show
> sess all" command on the CLI (and maybe "show fd" too) ?
By the way, be careful, "show sess all" will be huge and will disclose
some potentially sensitive information (source/destination
Le 15/01/2018 à 15:14, Samuel Reed a écrit :
Thank you for the patch and your quick attention to this issue. Results
after a few reloads, 8 threads on 16 core machine, both draining and new
process have patches.
New process:
% time seconds usecs/call calls errors syscall
--
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 08:14:40AM -0600, Samuel Reed wrote:
> Thank you for the patch and your quick attention to this issue. Results
> after a few reloads, 8 threads on 16 core machine, both draining and new
> process have patches.
>
> New process:
>
> % time seconds usecs/call calls
Thank you for the patch and your quick attention to this issue. Results
after a few reloads, 8 threads on 16 core machine, both draining and new
process have patches.
New process:
% time seconds usecs/call calls errors syscall
-- --- --- - - ---
Le 12/01/2018 à 18:51, Willy Tarreau a écrit :
On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 11:06:32AM -0600, Samuel Reed wrote:
On 1.8-git, similar results on the new process:
% time seconds usecs/call calls errors syscall
-- --- --- - -
93.75 0
Hi Tim,
On Sun, Jan 14, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> > Have you tested that req.hdr_ip / stick tables work w/both masks ? I
> > used something like:
> > http-request track-sc0 req.hdr_ip(X,1),ipmask(24,64) table test_be
> > http-request set-var(sess.myx) req.hdr_ip(X,1),ipmask(24,64)
> > http-response s
16 matches
Mail list logo
