On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 04:29:55PM +, David CARLIER wrote:
> Ok I applied your suggestions and move back the malloc_trim/mallinfo
> part as it was before.
Thanks, now merged!
Willy
Ok I applied your suggestions and move back the malloc_trim/mallinfo
part as it was before.
On Thu, 25 Nov 2021 at 14:37, Willy Tarreau wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 01:19:39PM +, David CARLIER wrote:
> > Here a patchset instead :)
>
> Thanks!
>
> I've reviewed it, I'm having some
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 01:19:39PM +, David CARLIER wrote:
> Here a patchset instead :)
Thanks!
I've reviewed it, I'm having some comments below:
> From e8daa477b53a43ab39113cf0e9c43d9bbda1e9a9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: David Carlier
> Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 10:26:50 +
>
чт, 25 нояб. 2021 г. в 18:22, David CARLIER :
> On Thu, 25 Nov 2021 at 12:25, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 04:38:27PM +0500, ??? wrote:
> > > > Thus I think that instead of focusing on the OS we ought to continue
> > > > to focus on the allocator and improve
On Thu, 25 Nov 2021 at 12:25, Willy Tarreau wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 04:38:27PM +0500, ??? wrote:
> > > Thus I think that instead of focusing on the OS we ought to continue
> > > to focus on the allocator and improve runtime detection:
> > >
> > > - glibc (currently detected
Here a patchset instead :)
On Thu, 25 Nov 2021 at 12:25, Willy Tarreau wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 04:38:27PM +0500, ??? wrote:
> > > Thus I think that instead of focusing on the OS we ought to continue
> > > to focus on the allocator and improve runtime detection:
> > >
> > >
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 04:38:27PM +0500, ??? wrote:
> > Thus I think that instead of focusing on the OS we ought to continue
> > to focus on the allocator and improve runtime detection:
> >
> > - glibc (currently detected using detect_allocator)
> > => use malloc_trim()
> > -
On Thu, 25 Nov 2021 at 11:38, Илья Шипицин wrote:
>
>
>
> чт, 25 нояб. 2021 г. в 14:54, Willy Tarreau :
>>
>> Hi David,
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 08:08:39PM +, David CARLIER wrote:
>> > Hi
>> >
>> > here a little patch for FreeBSD to support memory arenas trimming.
>> (...)
>> > FreeBSD
чт, 25 нояб. 2021 г. в 14:54, Willy Tarreau :
> Hi David,
>
> On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 08:08:39PM +, David CARLIER wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > here a little patch for FreeBSD to support memory arenas trimming.
> (...)
> > FreeBSD uses a slighty simplified version of jemalloc as libc allocator
> >
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 01:29:13PM +0300, Dmitry Sivachenko wrote:
>
> > On 25 Nov 2021, at 13:09, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> >
> > Please try the two attached patches. They re-backport something that
> > we earlier failed to backport that simplifies the ugly ifdefs everywhere
> > that virtually
> On 25 Nov 2021, at 13:29, Amaury Denoyelle wrote:
>
> Dmitry, the patches that Willy provided you should fix the issue. Now,
> do you need a 2.4.10 to be emitted early with it or is it possible for
> you to keep the patches in your tree so we can have a more substantial
> list of change for
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 11:42:01AM +0300, Dmitry Sivachenko wrote:
> On 24 Nov 2021, at 12:57, Christopher Faulet wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > HAProxy 2.4.9 was released on 2021/11/23. It added 36 new commits
> > after version 2.4.8.
> >
> Hello,
> version 2.4.9 fails to build with OpenSSL turned
> On 25 Nov 2021, at 13:09, Willy Tarreau wrote:
>
> Please try the two attached patches. They re-backport something that
> we earlier failed to backport that simplifies the ugly ifdefs everywhere
> that virtually break every single backport related to SSL.
>
> For me they work with/without
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 11:02:52AM +0100, Amaury Denoyelle wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 11:42:01AM +0300, Dmitry Sivachenko wrote:
> > On 24 Nov 2021, at 12:57, Christopher Faulet wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > HAProxy 2.4.9 was released on 2021/11/23. It added 36 new commits
> > > after
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 11:42:01AM +0300, Dmitry Sivachenko wrote:
> On 24 Nov 2021, at 12:57, Christopher Faulet wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > HAProxy 2.4.9 was released on 2021/11/23. It added 36 new commits
> > after version 2.4.8.
> >
> Hello,
> version 2.4.9 fails to build with OpenSSL turned
Hi David,
On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 08:08:39PM +, David CARLIER wrote:
> Hi
>
> here a little patch for FreeBSD to support memory arenas trimming.
(...)
> FreeBSD uses a slighty simplified version of jemalloc as libc allocator
> since many years (there is thoughts to eventually switch to
On 24 Nov 2021, at 12:57, Christopher Faulet wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> HAProxy 2.4.9 was released on 2021/11/23. It added 36 new commits
> after version 2.4.8.
>
Hello,
version 2.4.9 fails to build with OpenSSL turned off:
src/server.c:207:51: error: no member named 'ssl_ctx' in 'struct
Le 11/24/21 à 22:16, Bertrand Jacquin a écrit :
HAProxy is documented to support gcc >= 3.4 as per INSTALL file, however
hlua.c makes use of c11 only loop initial declarations leading to build
failure when using gcc-4.9.4:
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc -Iinclude -Wchar-subscripts -Wcomment
18 matches
Mail list logo
