Re: [PR] Using standard 'OOM' instead of 'Out of Memory'

2021-09-24 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi, On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 07:36:20PM +0530, Suvarna Pattayil wrote: > Hi, > > Yes, it does make sense. The original issue actually pertains to making the > messages uniform. But why ? Most of them are just partial messages that are combined in larger and more detailed messages, like "parsing

Re: [PR] Using standard 'OOM' instead of 'Out of Memory'

2021-09-24 Thread Suvarna Pattayil
Hi, Yes, it does make sense. The original issue actually pertains to making the messages uniform. To do this, a better approach is to see the individual .c files. Each one of then have a different format of the error message and try to unify those. Thanks, Suvarna 'SuvP' Pattayil On Fri, 24

Re: [PR] Using standard 'OOM' instead of 'Out of Memory'

2021-09-24 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hello, On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 05:23:01PM +0200, PR Bot wrote: > Dear list! > > Author: SuvP > Number of patches: 1 > > This is an automated relay of the Github pull request: >Using standard 'OOM' instead of 'Out of Memory' > > Patch title(s): >Using standard 'OOM' instead of 'Out of

[PR] Using standard 'OOM' instead of 'Out of Memory'

2021-09-18 Thread PR Bot
Dear list! Author: SuvP Number of patches: 1 This is an automated relay of the Github pull request: Using standard 'OOM' instead of 'Out of Memory' Patch title(s): Using standard 'OOM' instead of 'Out of Memory' Link: https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/pull/1397 Edit locally: