private keys
private key defiantly need revoked
i attached key to show how easy it is to xtract from coredump
you can download certificate https://crt.sh/?d=511527676 and verify
signature of message.txt using
openssl smime -verify -in message.txt.p7s -content message.txt -inform
PEM
Hello Julien,
On Thu, 23 Aug 2018 at 20:49, Julien Semaan wrote:
>
> Hi Olivier,
>
> Sorry for the delay, obtaining the core dump from a production environment
> was a bit tricky.
>
> So, I have attached the core dump to this email. I hope this will help you
> identify the issue.
The
On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 09:02:24AM -0400, Julien Semaan wrote:
> Hi Olivier,
>
> Thanks for the time you're taking to check the issue.
>
> I'll get an environment back with TCP splicing enabled and I'll run it in
> GDB and provide you a core dump
>
That would be great, thank you !
Olivier
Hi Olivier,
Thanks for the time you're taking to check the issue.
I'll get an environment back with TCP splicing enabled and I'll run it
in GDB and provide you a core dump
Best Regards,
--
Julien Semaan
jsem...@inverse.ca :: +1 (866) 353-6153 *155 ::www.inverse.ca
Inverse inc. ::
Hi Julien,
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 01:29:49PM -0400, Julien Semaan wrote:
> > Sorry, that was a "can" that really meant "can't" :) I can't reproduce it.
> Aw well, I was surprised it was so easy :)
>
yea, that would be too easy :)
> > Can you try to upgrade to 1.8.12 ? A number of bugs
> Sorry, that was a "can" that really meant "can't" :) I can't
reproduce it.
Aw well, I was surprised it was so easy :)
> Can you try to upgrade to 1.8.12 ? A number of bugs have been fixed since
I did try the upgrade to 1.8.12, got the same results (segfault)
although I wasn't able to
Hi Julian,
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 12:58:27PM -0400, Julien Semaan wrote:
> Hi Olivier,
>
> Glad you're able to replicate it because I can't get it to happen
> consistently!
> I'd be happy if you could share the details of how it could be replicated if
> that's not too complex or hard to explain
Hi Olivier,
Glad you're able to replicate it because I can't get it to happen
consistently!
I'd be happy if you could share the details of how it could be
replicated if that's not too complex or hard to explain via email.
Anyway, attached to this email, you'll find the haproxy configuration
Hi Julian,
On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 09:07:32AM -0400, Julien Semaan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We're currently using haproxy in our project PacketFence
> (https://packetfence.org) and are currently experiencing an issue with
> haproxy segfaulting when TCP splicing is enabled.
>
> We're currently
Hi Julien.
On 23/07/2018 13:59, Julien Semaan wrote:
Doing it with the patch does the equivalent of disabling it with the
option (realized there was an option afterwards).
We're more looking to know if the haproxy team is interested in getting
the issue addressed more than just getting the
Doing it with the patch does the equivalent of disabling it with the
option (realized there was an option afterwards).
We're more looking to know if the haproxy team is interested in getting
the issue addressed more than just getting the workaround
Thanks!
--
Julien Semaan
Hi Julien.
On 23/07/2018 09:07, Julien Semaan wrote:
Hi all,
We're currently using haproxy in our project PacketFence
(https://packetfence.org) and are currently experiencing an issue with
haproxy segfaulting when TCP splicing is enabled.
We're currently running version 1.8.9 and are
Hi all,
We're currently using haproxy in our project PacketFence
(https://packetfence.org) and are currently experiencing an issue with
haproxy segfaulting when TCP splicing is enabled.
We're currently running version 1.8.9 and are occasionally getting
segfaults on this specific line in
13 matches
Mail list logo
