On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 03:28:35PM +0100, Frederic Lecaille wrote:
> On 1/19/19 8:53 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > I was interested in backporting them to 1.8 once we have more experience
> > with them and they're better organized, so that we avoid backporting
> > reorg patches. I'd say we've made q
On 1/19/19 8:53 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Hi Lukas,
On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 12:43:34PM +0100, Lukas Tribus wrote:
Hello,
currently we have 4 reg-tests in haproxy-1.8, backported due to the
actual bugfix commit, which included a test. We also have a broken
symbolic link in reg-tests/lua/common.
On 1/19/19 8:53 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Hi Lukas,
On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 12:43:34PM +0100, Lukas Tribus wrote:
Hello,
currently we have 4 reg-tests in haproxy-1.8, backported due to the
actual bugfix commit, which included a test. We also have a broken
symbolic link in reg-tests/lua/common.
Hi Lukas,
On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 12:43:34PM +0100, Lukas Tribus wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> currently we have 4 reg-tests in haproxy-1.8, backported due to the
> actual bugfix commit, which included a test. We also have a broken
> symbolic link in reg-tests/lua/common.pem, which causes at least some
Hello,
currently we have 4 reg-tests in haproxy-1.8, backported due to the
actual bugfix commit, which included a test. We also have a broken
symbolic link in reg-tests/lua/common.pem, which causes at least some
confusion [1].
We don't have any test infrastructure in haproxy-1.8 (Makefile,
reg-t
5 matches
Mail list logo