wow. I am surprised how proxy protocl might be used.
can we add reg test on that ?
вт, 2 июл. 2019 г. в 01:31, Lukas Tribus :
> Hello Ilya, hello Willy,
>
>
> On Thu, 27 Jun 2019 at 14:04, Lukas Tribus wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Thu, 27 Jun 2019 at 13:19, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > >
> > >
Hello Ilya, hello Willy,
On Thu, 27 Jun 2019 at 14:04, Lukas Tribus wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, 27 Jun 2019 at 13:19, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> >
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 03:55:54PM +0500, ??? wrote:
> > > you are right, commit messages is not my best.
> > > sorry
Hello,
On Thu, 27 Jun 2019 at 13:19, Willy Tarreau wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 03:55:54PM +0500, ??? wrote:
> > you are right, commit messages is not my best.
> > sorry about that
> >
> > anyway, if you think it is wrong, you are welcome to provide a fix
> >
Hi guys,
On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 03:55:54PM +0500, ??? wrote:
> ??, 27 ???. 2019 ?. ? 15:33, Lukas Tribus :
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Thu, 27 Jun 2019 at 08:43, ??? wrote:
> > >> However this commit also changes error handling with OpenSSL:
> > >>
> > >>
> >
чт, 27 июн. 2019 г. в 15:33, Lukas Tribus :
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, 27 Jun 2019 at 08:43, Илья Шипицин wrote:
> >> However this commit also changes error handling with OpenSSL:
> >>
> >>
>
Hello,
On Thu, 27 Jun 2019 at 08:43, Илья Шипицин wrote:
>> However this commit also changes error handling with OpenSSL:
>>
>> https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/commit/54832b97c65c43ee50b6661a9b4b05885427b5e9#diff-cc9b3f376afbc81cf478eeac17839172L5533
>>
>>
>> Can you clarify if the OpenSSL
ср, 26 июн. 2019 г. в 23:30, Lukas Tribus :
> Hello Ilya, Willy,
>
>
> On Sun, 5 May 2019 at 20:30, Илья Шипицин wrote:
> >
> > something has changed. build is passing now, reg-tests fail (they used
> to work earlier)
> >
> >
> > I'd apply those patches (and we will fix reg-tests later)
>
> One
Hello Ilya, Willy,
On Sun, 5 May 2019 at 20:30, Илья Шипицин wrote:
>
> something has changed. build is passing now, reg-tests fail (they used to
> work earlier)
>
>
> I'd apply those patches (and we will fix reg-tests later)
One of those patches is 54832b97c6 ("BUILD: enable several LibreSSL
Hi Lukas,
On Mon, May 06, 2019 at 06:51:57PM +0200, Lukas Tribus wrote:
> There is room for improvement here. Can you confirm that attaching a
> patch file per commit to the email would fix this usability issue?
I'd say yes, provided the attachments are prefixed with a sequence
number, like
Hello Willy,
On Mon, 6 May 2019 at 08:06, Willy Tarreau wrote:
>
> Hi Ilya,
>
> > I made another PR
> >
> > https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/pull/92
>
> Thank you.
>
> > (I really like automatic PR to mailing list routing)
>
> Well, it was the only workable workaround we have when people send
I have just noticed that "scripts/build-ssl.sh" is missing in .travis.yml
so, unfortunately, we are running all builds against xenial openssl-1.0.2
(no openssl-1.1.X, no libressl...)
I'm not sure when "scripts/build-ssl.sh" disappeared. I'll send new patch
soon
пн, 6 мая 2019 г. в 11:05, Willy
well, I hope travis-ci will be useful (or we will drop it).
as for PR, I meant that it should have been sent to list anyway (but it was
not sent for some reason).
I can send using "git send email" as well
пн, 6 мая 2019 г. в 11:05, Willy Tarreau :
> Hi Ilya,
>
> > I made another PR
> >
> >
Hi Ilya,
> I made another PR
>
> https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/pull/92
Thank you.
> (I really like automatic PR to mailing list routing)
Well, it was the only workable workaround we have when people send PRs.
Sadly we can't block them. Apparently only mirror repositories can block
PRs
I made another PR
https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/pull/92
(I really like automatic PR to mailing list routing)
LibreSSL builds were ok when I sent a patch for the first time. seem there
are some regression.
actually, patch is almost identical (I rebased it to current master)
вс, 5 мая 2019
something has changed. build is passing now, reg-tests fail (they used to
work earlier)
I'd apply those patches (and we will fix reg-tests later)
вс, 5 мая 2019 г. в 15:51, Willy Tarreau :
> On Sun, May 05, 2019 at 02:26:11PM +0500, ??? wrote:
> > can we also apply patch from
> >
On Sun, May 05, 2019 at 02:26:11PM +0500, ??? wrote:
> can we also apply patch from
> https://www.mail-archive.com/haproxy@formilux.org/msg33439.html ?
> it should repair libressl builds
Ah indeed I remember having noticed this one and postponed it because it
needed to be edited to have
can we also apply patch from
https://www.mail-archive.com/haproxy@formilux.org/msg33439.html ?
it should repair libressl builds
вс, 5 мая 2019 г. в 13:25, Willy Tarreau :
> On Fri, May 03, 2019 at 10:23:05AM +, PR Bot wrote:
> > Description:
> >added openssl-1.0.2, 1.1.0, 1.1.1,
On Fri, May 03, 2019 at 10:23:05AM +, PR Bot wrote:
> Description:
>added openssl-1.0.2, 1.1.0, 1.1.1, libressl-2.7.5, 2.8.3, 2.9.1
>added linux-ppc64le image
Applied, thanks Ilya,
Willy
Dear list!
Author: Ilya Shipitsin
Number of patches: 1
This is an automated relay of the Github pull request:
BUILD: extend travis-ci matrix
Patch title(s):
BUILD: extend travis-ci matrix
Link:
https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/pull/91
Edit locally:
wget
19 matches
Mail list logo
