Willy,
I will post results when available.
--
Evgeniy
On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 06, 2015 at 02:54:13PM +0200, Evgeniy Sudyr wrote:
>> this is server with 2x Intel I350-T4 1G Quad port NICs, where on first
>> card each NIC is connected to uplink provider
On Mon, Apr 06, 2015 at 02:54:13PM +0200, Evgeniy Sudyr wrote:
> this is server with 2x Intel I350-T4 1G Quad port NICs, where on first
> card each NIC is connected to uplink provider and 2nd NIC 4 ports are
> used for trunk interface with lacp connected to internal 1Gb switch
> with lacp configure
On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 2:54 PM, Evgeniy Sudyr wrote:
> Btw, where Pavlos reported his test results? There in list or somewhere else?
On this ML.
Pavlos was running Linux ;)
Baptiste
this is server with 2x Intel I350-T4 1G Quad port NICs, where on first
card each NIC is connected to uplink provider and 2nd NIC 4 ports are
used for trunk interface with lacp connected to internal 1Gb switch
with lacp configured as well. I've tested uplinks and internal link
with iperf and was abl
On Mon, Apr 06, 2015 at 12:34:05PM +0200, Evgeniy Sudyr wrote:
> Hi Willy,
>
> pleasure for me to get answer from you!
>
> 1) I've tested with OpenBSD's SP kernel and single process (no nbproc)
> in haproxy.conf and it was no significant difference in load.
OK, I was not sure whether it was the
Hi Willy,
pleasure for me to get answer from you!
1) I've tested with OpenBSD's SP kernel and single process (no nbproc)
in haproxy.conf and it was no significant difference in load.
I can't test to disable PF to test, because it's some kind of production router.
2) I guess solution is to get s
Hi Evgeniy,
On Sun, Apr 05, 2015 at 06:29:53PM +0200, Evgeniy Sudyr wrote:
> Nenad,
>
> thank your answer!
>
> 1) this is only Haproxy server active (active/passive config exists,
> but using carp on OpenBSD).
>
> 2) As I understand with nbcproc 4 I can't get stats working correctly ...
>
> ho
Nenad,
thank your answer!
1) this is only Haproxy server active (active/passive config exists,
but using carp on OpenBSD).
2) As I understand with nbcproc 4 I can't get stats working correctly ...
however at the moment I see that for https frontend I have :
Current connection rate:58/s
Curr
Evgeniy,
On 4/5/2015 4:47 PM, Evgeniy Sudyr wrote:
Lukas, thank you for pointing to possible keep-alive issues, I've
tested it before, but did it again just to make one more check!
I've increased keep alives timeout to 10se and removed
http-server-close, restarted haproxy :)
Changes I've note
Lukas, thank you for pointing to possible keep-alive issues, I've
tested it before, but did it again just to make one more check!
I've increased keep alives timeout to 10se and removed
http-server-close, restarted haproxy :)
Changes I've noted - haproxy reduced from AVG 78% to AVG 75% per each C
> Hi all,
>
> haproxy is used for http and https load balancing with TLS termination
> on haproxy side.
>
> I'm using openbsd -stable on this box. I got CPU saturated with
> 250Mbps traffic in/out summary on frontend NICs and 3000 ESTABLISHED
> connections on frontent interface to haproxy.
Remove
Hi all,
haproxy is used for http and https load balancing with TLS termination
on haproxy side.
I'm using openbsd -stable on this box. I got CPU saturated with
250Mbps traffic in/out summary on frontend NICs and 3000 ESTABLISHED
connections on frontent interface to haproxy.
# all connections to
12 matches
Mail list logo