Re: Problem with external healthchecks and haproxy-ss-20140720

[Cc Malcolm Turnbull] On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 12:29:36AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: Hi Cyril! On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 10:30:52PM +0200, Cyril Bonté wrote: Hi all, Le 07/08/2014 01:16, Cyril Bonté a écrit : Hi Bjoern, Le 06/08/2014 22:16, bjun...@gmail.com a écrit : (...)

Re: Problem with external healthchecks and haproxy-ss-20140720

I agree as well.. :-). Our original specification was to match the way that ldirectord does its external health checks (so that the customer scripts are compatible). We could just change ldirectord to be compatible with the new style as it sounds more extensible (leaving it backwards compatible

Re: Problem with external healthchecks and haproxy-ss-20140720

Hi, Le 15/08/2014 10:12, Malcolm Turnbull a écrit : I agree as well.. :-). Our original specification was to match the way that ldirectord does its external health checks (so that the customer scripts are compatible). We could just change ldirectord to be compatible with the new style as it

Re: Problem with external healthchecks and haproxy-ss-20140720

On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 09:12:56AM +0100, Malcolm Turnbull wrote: I agree as well.. :-). Our original specification was to match the way that ldirectord does its external health checks (so that the customer scripts are compatible). We could just change ldirectord to be compatible with the

Re: Problem with external healthchecks and haproxy-ss-20140720

Hi all, Le 07/08/2014 01:16, Cyril Bonté a écrit : Hi Bjoern, Le 06/08/2014 22:16, bjun...@gmail.com a écrit : (...) [ALERT] 216/205611 (1316) : Starting [be_test:node01] check: no listener. Segmentation fault (core dumped) OK, I could reproduce it. This is happening for several reasons :

Re: Problem with external healthchecks and haproxy-ss-20140720

Hi Cyril! On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 10:30:52PM +0200, Cyril Bonté wrote: Hi all, Le 07/08/2014 01:16, Cyril Bonté a écrit : Hi Bjoern, Le 06/08/2014 22:16, bjun...@gmail.com a écrit : (...) [ALERT] 216/205611 (1316) : Starting [be_test:node01] check: no listener. Segmentation fault (core

Re: Problem with external healthchecks and haproxy-ss-20140720

2014-08-07 1:16 GMT+02:00 Cyril Bonté cyril.bo...@free.fr: Hi Bjoern, Le 06/08/2014 22:16, bjun...@gmail.com a écrit : Hi Mark, trying to test this one, but if i use the frontend/backend-syntax (and not the listen-syntax) with external-check command, HAProxy segfaults : #

Re: Problem with external healthchecks and haproxy-ss-20140720

2014-08-04 11:44 GMT+02:00 Mark Brooks m...@loadbalancer.org: We have started doing some testing with the external health check functionality but unfortunately we cannot get the real servers to be marked as online when using this feature. This was tested with haproxy-ss-20140720 When using

Re: Problem with external healthchecks and haproxy-ss-20140720

Hi Mark, this is the first mail from the mailing list I'm reading, after some days off ;-) Le 04/08/2014 11:44, Mark Brooks a écrit : We have started doing some testing with the external health check functionality but unfortunately we cannot get the real servers to be marked as online when

Re: Problem with external healthchecks and haproxy-ss-20140720

Hi Bjoern, Le 06/08/2014 22:16, bjun...@gmail.com a écrit : Hi Mark, trying to test this one, but if i use the frontend/backend-syntax (and not the listen-syntax) with external-check command, HAProxy segfaults : # /usr/local/sbin/haproxy -f /etc/haproxy/haproxy.cfg -d Available polling

Problem with external healthchecks and haproxy-ss-20140720

We have started doing some testing with the external health check functionality but unfortunately we cannot get the real servers to be marked as online when using this feature. This was tested with haproxy-ss-20140720 When using the external check the real servers are never marked as up. The